Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption: What A Convoluted History!

Amazing! And pretty disappointing, too, with what's been done to our veterans and
their survivors. 

Let's review the confusing history of this mess. Just follow the explanation of how we've tried but only partly succeeded in protecting our disabled veterans.

In 2014 the Colorado legislature passed HB14-1373 to include survivors of totally disabled veterans with the veterans and seniors over age 65 for the small, partial disabled veteran property tax exemption. This was a blatant modification of the state constitution without first bothering the voters for our okay. 

Please understand: We voters first created our state constitution and then authorized constitutional amendments. Years later the legislature took it on themselves (yes, for good reasons, of course) to make changes they felt useful by passing HB14-1373. Regardless of intent or outcome, this was a no-no and an unconstitutional action by the legislature: the legislature has no power to modify or change the constitution. The estimated cost was around $100,000.

They simply did it. Folks involved at the time today agree it "abused" the constitution but hey – they did it anyway.

Regardless of procedure, that was a good thing with a very small footprint, not likely to invite any challenge: Indeed, there has been none. I can't find any notice ever made about this "extra-constitutional" legislative action that added a few hundred widow(ers) to a program already attracting attention for its cost. I make mention of it only because it was done and it should be done again!

You see, the legislature passed SCR06-001 in 2006, then presented it to Colorado voters as Referendum E. We approved it overwhelmingly, extending the senior property tax exemption to a few thousand totally and permanently disabled veterans. The original version of that tax exemption covered only seniors and its genesis was HB00-1002. The legislature passed that in 2000 for presentation to the voters as Referendum A. It passed, with an estimated cost of just over a million dollars.

Those two referenda – A in 2000 and then E in 2006, made totally and permanently disabled veterans and seniors as the two categories of homeowners qualified for the property tax exemption. Then HB14-1373 added the veterans' survivors.

Let's review:
1. 2000, Referendum A + HB00-1002 = the senior exemption, apparently also including survivors
2. 2006, Referendum E + SCR06-001 + HB07-1251 = the disabled veteran exemption
3. 2014, HB14-1373 = the disabled veteran's survivor exemption
4. 2016, HB16-1444 = aligned the statute with the constitution, adding disabled military retirees' exemption 

HB21-1002: We must note the dastardly action by the senate in June 2021 rejecting the unanimous house bill for a referendum adding Gold Star Spouses to the disabled veteran property tax exemption. 

Survivors of military personnel lost in the line of duty are presently denied the exemption by a stupid and illogical technicality: The exemption recognizes only survivors of veterans who die while in receipt of the exemption. Dying in combat very obviously prevents a veteran from returning to Colorado to qualify for the exemption, so we deny it to the widow. Dumb in the extreme.

The senate's unpatriotic rejection dishonored Colorado but "saved" the state about $95,000.

Colorado Senators - You KILLED Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption for my Widow? WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

         What Were You Thinking?
NOT ABOUT ME, MY WIFE OR MY KIDS!
THAT'S FOR CERTAIN!

 

Genuine thanks are due the Colorado House of Representatives!

I must set aside my disappointment with the Colorado Senate Veterans Committee killing HCR21-1001 last week. The House is due a salute and my most sincere thanks for their amazing step of a unanimous vote approving HCR21-1001. 

"...submitting to the registered electors of the state of Colorado an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning the extension of the property tax exemption for qualifying seniors and disabled veterans to the Gold Star Spouses of deceased members of the United States Armed Forces. "

Thank you, Republicans and Democrats in the Colorado House of Representatives for your unanimous approval of HCR21-1002 that you forwarded to the Senate where others decided $93,000 was just too much to "honor" survivors of our servicemembers.

 Earlier, well before any news of HCR21-1002's existence, I have expected and urged a statutory approach to protecting Gold Star Wives by exercising the legislature's power to redefine terms, thus avoiding the two-year delay built into HCR21-1002, and resolving the issue with 2022 legislation.

THE REST OF THE STORY: The Brief Life & Sudden Death of Colorado's Gold Star Wives' Tax Exemption

Not about to waste a perfectly good opportunity to turn virtually every veterans' wrath against them, yesterday the Colorado Senate Veterans Committee killed HCR21-1002. 

Ever budget-conscious, the committee's discussion indicated they felt it terribly unwise to "waste" $94,000 permitting widows of active-duty troops the same very modest property tax break now given widows of our 100% disabled veterans. Colorado has 140 widows of active-duty troops, all denied the small exemption because the awkward wording of the 2014 legislation restricted the exemption to widows of a veteran already getting the exemption.

Get it?

a) Die on active duty = no widow's tax exemption, or

b) Die after active duty as a disabled vet = widow gets exemption.

Troops call this kind of situation "bass-ack-wards." 

The rest of the story? After a unanimous House vote for HCR21-1002, it was killed because some senators might to do "something" next year to go to the voters in 2023 for some relief for the widows in 2024.

"Something" apparently being a larger overhaul of the entire property tax exemption issue that costs $150,000,000 each year. Gold Star Wives  (mostly elderly of World War II, Korean Conflict and Vietnam eras) would have added 0.00062 to that $150M.

I think the House could have chosen a better approach to the Gold Star Wives, something easier than the constitutional amendment HCR21-1002 required. The legislature took it on themselves to include widows of 100% disabled vets who were receiving the exemption by HB14-1373, not an amendment which is more difficult. 

All the House had to do was use 21 new words refine the definition of "qualifying veteran" to include "or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who died in the line of duty on active service" in a  new statute.

Here's what it took to include survivors in the original 2014 bill:

39-3-203. Property tax exemption - qualifications. (1.5) (a.5)

FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2015, FIFTY PERCENT OF THE FIRST TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF ACTUAL VALUE OF RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY THAT AS OF THE ASSESSMENT DATE IS OWNER-OCCUPIED AND IS USED AS THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE OF AN OWNER-OCCUPIER WHO IS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED AN EXEMPTION UNDER PARAGRAPH (a) OF THIS SUBSECTION (1.5) IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION.

Here's the redefined "qualifying veteran":

SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED AN EXEMPTION or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who died in the line of duty on active service UNDER PARAGRAPH (a) OF THIS SUBSECTION (1.5) IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION.

And that's "the rest of the story!" 

Here's the Colorado Bar Association's statement:

"Gold Star Wives, survivors of active-duty servicemembers, are denied the exemption because the state constitution (Amendment X Section 3.5) allows the exemption to survivors of veterans already in receipt of the benefit. Colorado legislators apparently did not consider the issue of active-duty deaths. Loss of the servicemember on active duty precludes the 'already in receipt of the benefit' requirement. Proposed is a redefinition of a qualified recipient to include survivors of active duty servicemembers who die in the line of duty."