THE REST OF THE STORY: The Brief Life & Sudden Death of Colorado's Gold Star Wives' Tax Exemption

Not about to waste a perfectly good opportunity to turn virtually every veterans' wrath against them, yesterday the Colorado Senate Veterans Committee killed HCR21-1002. 

Ever budget-conscious, the committee's discussion indicated they felt it terribly unwise to "waste" $94,000 permitting widows of active-duty troops the same very modest property tax break now given widows of our 100% disabled veterans. Colorado has 140 widows of active-duty troops, all denied the small exemption because the awkward wording of the 2014 legislation restricted the exemption to widows of a veteran already getting the exemption.

Get it?

a) Die on active duty = no widow's tax exemption, or

b) Die after active duty as a disabled vet = widow gets exemption.

Troops call this kind of situation "bass-ack-wards." 

The rest of the story? After a unanimous House vote for HCR21-1002, it was killed because some senators might to do "something" next year to go to the voters in 2023 for some relief for the widows in 2024.

"Something" apparently being a larger overhaul of the entire property tax exemption issue that costs $150,000,000 each year. Gold Star Wives  (mostly elderly of World War II, Korean Conflict and Vietnam eras) would have added 0.00062 to that $150M.

I think the House could have chosen a better approach to the Gold Star Wives, something easier than the constitutional amendment HCR21-1002 required. The legislature took it on themselves to include widows of 100% disabled vets who were receiving the exemption by HB14-1373, not an amendment which is more difficult. 

All the House had to do was use 21 new words refine the definition of "qualifying veteran" to include "or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who died in the line of duty on active service" in a  new statute.

Here's what it took to include survivors in the original 2014 bill:

39-3-203. Property tax exemption - qualifications. (1.5) (a.5)

FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2015, FIFTY PERCENT OF THE FIRST TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF ACTUAL VALUE OF RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY THAT AS OF THE ASSESSMENT DATE IS OWNER-OCCUPIED AND IS USED AS THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE OF AN OWNER-OCCUPIER WHO IS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED AN EXEMPTION UNDER PARAGRAPH (a) OF THIS SUBSECTION (1.5) IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION.

Here's the redefined "qualifying veteran":

SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED AN EXEMPTION or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who died in the line of duty on active service UNDER PARAGRAPH (a) OF THIS SUBSECTION (1.5) IS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION.

And that's "the rest of the story!" 

Here's the Colorado Bar Association's statement:

"Gold Star Wives, survivors of active-duty servicemembers, are denied the exemption because the state constitution (Amendment X Section 3.5) allows the exemption to survivors of veterans already in receipt of the benefit. Colorado legislators apparently did not consider the issue of active-duty deaths. Loss of the servicemember on active duty precludes the 'already in receipt of the benefit' requirement. Proposed is a redefinition of a qualified recipient to include survivors of active duty servicemembers who die in the line of duty."

Colorado Bar Association: Statement of Support for Disabled Veterans and Gold Star Wives re: Property Tax Exemption

 Colorado Bar Statement:

"The Military and Veterans Affairs Committee (MVA) of the Colorado Bar Association has affirmed its support for two state legislative objectives for 2022. Both involve the state's partial Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, a constitutional benefit since 2007.

Gold Star Wives, survivors of active-duty servicemembers, are denied the exemption because the legislation (HB-14-1373) and enabling statute provides the exemption for survivors of veterans who had the benefit at the time of death. Using the text, "the surviving spouse of a qualified disabled veteran who previously received an exemption," 

Colorado legislators apparently did not consider the issue of active-duty deaths. Loss of the servicemember on active duty precludes the 'previously received an exemption' requirement. Proposed is a redefinition of a qualified recipient to include survivors of active duty servicemembers who die in the line of duty.

The second proposed legislative issue is veterans with VA Total Disability for Individual Unemployability, or 'TDIU.' Just like VA's other 100% disability veterans whose wounds or illnesses are rated totally disabling, these vets are 100% permanently and totally disabled, but currently are excluded from the exemption. 

Their disability is total, not per the VA rating schedule for the particular disability, but because their service-connected disability makes them unable to maintain employment. A TDIU veteran has been found by the VA to be physically or mentally unable to ever work again due to their service-connected disabilities. MVA will propose redefining 'disabled veteran to include TDIU veterans."

Public Officials take an oath to support Colorado's constitution. What does that really mean?

Why? Because it guarantees my rights and freedoms, and Colorado officials take a solemn oath of office to support my rights and freedoms guaranteed by it.

 

Apology: I have to admit writing out of seven years of mounting
frustration on this state issue. You see, in my world the oath was military; “support and defend” and we were trusted to do just that, regardless of personal hazards, difficulties, obstacles, etc. We were also carefully taught for decades that support and defense of the Constitution of the United States is our highest duty.

Lesson from the 1946-1948 Nurenberg trials? Orders from a superior that conflict are illegal. If laws, orders and regulations present a conflict, I must seek assistance from colleagues, higher authorities, the Judge Advocate General, or even resign if possible. If circumstances leave my resignation impossible, I am obliged to obey the Constitution as best I can understand it. Merely hiding behind an illegal or unconstitutional order would be no defense at all.

But what about the oath to support the constitution of the state of Colorado? State officials swear to support both the US and the state constitutions?

This essay’s question arises because of an obvious conflict between our Colorado constitution’s Article X Section 3.5 and its enabling legislation, both resulting from the 2006 Referendum E.  S.C.R. 06-001 in 2007 law left out fifteen words describing totally disabled military retirees and the guaranty therein of a disabled veteran property tax exemption: 

    "the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force."

Those last fifteen words in Section 3.5 and not in S.C.R. 06-001 or § 39-3-202 C.R.S. (until 2016) denied the property tax exemption to approximately 450 totally disabled military retirees, about ten percent of our entire eligible vets. Still abandoned as of June 2021 are 450 with an Army, Navy or Air Force medical retirement as totally disabled. They’re constitutionally qualified for but statutorily disqualified for the exemption. 

That is, veterans who are qualified and entitled by the constitution but denied by the law or regulations or actions of the government.

In this instance, state agencies and state officials have elected since 2007 to adhere to the law and not the constitution. Year after year, they refused the constitutional protection of Article X Section 3.5 guaranteed these 450 Colorado disabled veterans.
 

The purpose of Colorado’s oath of office, itself part of our constitution, is to remind state workers and officials is that they do not swear allegiance to a supervisor, agency, political appointee, law or regulation, or even to the governor or president. Their paramount oath is to support the Colorado and United States constitutions and faithfully execute one’s duties.  

Private citizens are not party to this reminder and have no duties under it directly. Public employees and officials most definitely do have duties they’ve sworn to fulfill. We should be able to rely on them faithfully doing so. The people of Colorado are sovereign over the courts, the executive and the legislature with all its laws. The constitution represents the will of the people – yet the people’s will has been ignored as regards the disabled veteran property tax exemption owed our 100% disabled medically retired servicemembers.

If Colorado courts wait to address the problem until it arises as a case or controversy about taxation, public trust in the fairness and legality of imposed every citizen's tax burden could be shaken.

§ 39-3-202 C.R.S is just a statute; it cannot override the Colorado Constitution. In Colorado, the only way to remove the right of disabled military retirees to the property tax exemption would be by amending the state Constitution. Unless and until there is an amendment, no statute can deprive Coloradans of their constitutional rights. DOLA, the Treasurer, and CDMVA simply skipped that process and ignored the constitution.

Fortunately, the Colorado Constitution gives the Colorado Supreme Court the authority to “give its opinion upon important questions upon solemn occasions when required by the governor, the senate, or the house of representatives. . .” In other words, the governor, the state house, or the state senate can send an interrogatory to the Colorado Supreme Court, even if no case has arisen in which a taxpayer plaintiff has standing. 

For ten years, DOLA and CDMVA opted to tax 450 disabled veterans despite the constitutional protection due the vets. An estimated $3.825M has been lawfully but unconstitutionally raised in these excess taxes. DOLA writes they must assume the laws to be constitutionally correct; they have blinders on even when the laws clearly are unconstitutional.

One can assume that our fifteen missing constitutional words have long been noted for their absence. Noted, but never corrected, not by DOLA, CDMVA, LSC, the secretary of state, or the attorney general. Sworn officials dismissed this issue, telling veterans “go talk to your legislator or the supreme court. Get your constitutional rights only if you are able to and can afford to go to the supreme court.” In effect, “it is not our job to support the constitution for its benefits guaranteed you disabled veterans.”

After similar responses from DOLA, a 100% disabled military retiree sought correction of the issue in 2014; HB16-1444, a new law effect by 2017, brought the statute into agreement with the constitution. The important point: officials took the oath and should be expected to (but did not) uphold Article X Section 3.5 of Colorado above any conflicting law or regulation. 

They did nothing to support the constitution, choosing instead enforcement of the flawed, incomplete law. Sworn officials did not go to the legislature for a correction, did not go to the supreme court, did not refuse to enforce a clearly unconstitutional tax statute – they opted not to uphold their solemn oath.

Where does this bring us today? Problem solved? Nope. Not hardly!

Despite HB16-1444, special legislation back in 2016 to bring the tax statutes into compliance with the constitution, the state continues to block veterans guaranteed protection from those fifteen last words in Article X Section 3.5 –"the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force."

How? By still requiring these 450 vets to submit documentation from the VA. Even the forms updated since 2016 continue to inform veterans they are qualified only if they are 100% VA vets with VA documentation.

Web site after county web site, state web site after state web site, virtually every place one finds information about the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption DOLA and CDMVA continue to ignore the constitution. DOLA has tried at least twice in the last five years to have counties update details about the exemption, but even the DOLA web site application and instruction forms continue to misinform veterans that a document showing VA 100% disability must be submitted. A disabled military retiree reading that simply doesn't bother going any further.

DOLA has tried, and perhaps CDMVA even more than I know, but Colorado continues to insist on unconstitutional taxes taken from disabled veteran homeowners.

   

Did Colorado OVERTAX 100% Disabled Veterans an EXTRA $3.6M in Property Taxes?

Yes. It appears that for nearly fifteen years Colorado has accidentally but unconstitutionally overcharged hundreds of our 100% disabled military veterans by $4,050,000! Nearly seven percent of the totally disabled military veterans in Colorado are involved.This is a complicated constitutional argument to follow, so have fun! (The final paragraph provides the reasoning behind the $4.1M unfairly taxed from vets.)

In 2007 voters approved Referendum E to create Article X Section 3.5, qualifying 100% disabled military veterans a partial property tax exemption similar to the senior exemption. This had been referred to the voters by the legislature for constitutional amendment as S.C.R. 06-001:

"Property tax exemption for disabled veterans. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, extends the existing property tax exemption for qualifying seniors to any United States military veteran, including any member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, who has been separated from service under honorable conditions and who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability. Requires the state to compensate local governments for property tax revenues lost as a result of the extension of the exemption."

For following this issue today, the relevant part of Article X Section 3.5, the amendment created by Referendum E is:

"(1.5) For purposes of this section, 'disabled veteran' means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force"

The legislature then turned to provide an enabling statute to implement the new amendment, passing HB07-1251:

"(3.5) 'QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN' MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT AND TOTAL DISABILITY PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT."

HB07-1251 begat the tax details in C.R.S. Section 39-3-202 which read (until 2016 with HB16-1444):

(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department.

By the plain reading of the new constitutional amendment, all a qualified vet would have to do is present a copy of their VA certification or proof of medical retirement from the armed forces as totally disabled in the line of duty. Both were specified in  Article X Section 3.5 because some military retirees never seek a VA disability – a number estimated by the state at about 450.

The problem causing vets being forced to pay extra property taxes by being denied the exemption arose when the constitutional amendment in Referendum E was implemented in tax statutes. The Legislature passed HB07-1251 and in doing so, forgot (neglected, opted against) to include the last fifteen words of Article X Section 3.5 – "the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force"

Do you see it? Compare the last fifteen words in Article X Section 3.5 against subsequent legislation. The lawmakers clearly did not include the referendum's provision for 100% disabled military retirees. Fifteen words left out denied the exemption to about 450 veterans.

By the plain reading of the new constitutional amendment, all a qualified vet would have to do is present a copy of their VA certification or proof of medical retirement from the armed forces as totally disabled in the line of duty. Both were specified in  Article X Section 3.5 because some military retirees never seek a VA disability – a number estimated by the state at about 450. 

Here's our problem: Colorado’s constitution is supreme, trumping statutory law in areas of conflict. Article X Section 3.5 therefore outguns HB07-1251, at least in the part where disabled military retirees are left out of the legislation.

So HB07-1251 seems unconstitutional. Only the Supreme Court can declare it so, but the plain meaning of the words (and of the words not included in the statute) is very clear. 100% disabled military retirees separated by their services should have been receiving our Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption since 2007.

In 2014 along came a 100% disabled military retiree who's application for the exemption was denied by CDMVA. The vet was initially rebuffed, referred back to the statute and various forms. But then he tracked the statutes back to the constitution and Article X Section 3.5. Even reading it a few times wasn't illuminating, at least not until he read it a bit more slowly and noted those missing fifteen words! Eureka!

This could have been resolved by working the issue up to the Supreme Court, but sympathetic advice from DOLA experts proved much more effective – "go to your legislators."

A couple phone calls, a few town hall meetings and many letters and emails later, Senator John Kefalas and other legislators took the bit in their teeth and got HB16-1444 enacted. That happened because the United Veterans Coalition backed the issue by making it a 2006 legislative objective. 

So, this little problem solved, thought the vet. HB16-1444 took effect in 2017 and he got his exemption, although he'd also received a VA 100% rating to replace his initial VA 100% disability rating for TDIU. Then in 2018 he noticed few of the counties updated forms or instructions to include those fifteen last words left out that got the correction.

Off went a missive to DOLA, asking them to urge counties and other state agencies to more closely adhere to the law. DOLA responded quickly, posting another reminder that circulated throughout the state. DOLA also said they'd update their own form and web site information.

Problem solved? No. Checking this month of June 2021, four years after HB16-1444 went into effect, fourteen years after the constitutional mistake was made, DOLA, Treasury, CMDVA and other agencies and most counties still fail to include 100% military disabled retirees.

How did the figure $4,050,000 get calculated?  The number of 450 affected disabled military retirees from state agency reports was multiplied by $600 for the average value of the property tax exemption denied them, then multiplied by fifteen years. Total: $4.1M.  Unconstitutional?

Here is the background paper trail on this issue.

===============================

Here are examples of state or county agencies failing to properly describe qualified veterans:

A. DOLA, CMDVA, Boulder, Douglas, Pacific, Weld, most counties's application

=========================================================

B. Douglas, most other counties' application instruction
===================================================

Property Tax

Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

This program is for Disabled Veterans who:

• Are RATED by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at 100%, Permanently and Totally Disabled by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Individual Unemployability does not qualify) AND

C. Even DOLA and the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs doesn't correct inaccurate information.
====================================================

D.  Treasurer of the state - him, too! Fear of having to give unconstitutionally demanded property taxes back to the
disabled military retireesQ

REPRINT: Back in 2017 I complained that the state ignored HB16-1444 – Still little compliance with constitution!

by Wes Carter, National Chairperson, The C-123 Veterans Association

It’s damn hard to believe. Over this last decade state officials simply ignored property tax provisions spelled out in Colorado’s constitution to provide a small exemption to totally disabled troops retired by the military for line-of-duty injuries. It’s like the law simply went missing in action.

Back in 2006 voters amended our constitution, approving by a four-to-one margin to provide a small, partial property tax exemption. Only about $6000 value on average, the exemption is for two categories of injured servicemembers: Troops retired by the military as totally and permanently, and second, veterans rated 100% totally and permanently disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs – "TDIU."

Referendum E carefully addressed both of the above categories because there are three differences between them:

1. Not all disabled military retirees also seek a VA disability rating – ratings must be applied for and, unlike military disability retirements, can take months or years to establish

2. Although based on similar laws, often military retirees face years of delays with claims and appeals to receive VA ratings, but military disability retirements are effective immediately upon leaving active duty

3. The military views a disability as medically unable, through line-of-duty illness or injury, to perform one's military specialty or be retrained in another; VA views disability as the percentage of loss of capacity to work in meaningful employment, somewhat similar to Social Security disability rules

(real example: Northern Colorado resident Vietnam-era veteran medically retired as 100% by the military in 1991 because of Gulf War injuries. Filed VA claims for numerous 100% disabling injuries and Agent Orange illnesses in 1992-1994 but not finally approved for 100% VA disability rating until 2015. Per our constitution's Article X Section 3.5, this veteran was eligible for Colorado's disabled veteran tax exemption in 2007. As of December 2017, still no state web site instructions or forms permit his application because only federal VA 100% disability ratings are mentioned, not his 100% military medical retirement.)

Problem: Through an oversight when the 2007 statute was drafted, the category of totally disabled military retirees was simply not mentioned…language about them is in the constitution, but was absent from the text of the law.

In 2015 concerned citizens discovered this missing language issue and asked the legislature to align the constitution with the statute. Both houses approved HB-1444 unanimously and it was signed into law in May 2016.

And then, generally ignored by state and local officials.

These outsider efforts re: Gold Star Wives' Colorado property tax exemption are now suspended

At this point it seems best to cease our outsider efforts hoping for addition of the Gold Star Wives Colorado property tax exemption to the United Veterans Coalition 2022 state legislative agenda. The work was unhelpful and trod on other veterans' needs. 

A couple issues are already underway by themselves: An American Legion asking UVC to make Gold Star Wives one of its 2022 legislative objectives, and consideration by the Colorado Bar Association of both Gold Star Wives and TDIU veterans. GSW and UVC can consider them or not, as they wish.

If Gold Star Wives do seek the exemption one day, I hope they are successful because they deserve it. Further, all veterans want UVC to press its 2022 federal and state agendas to satisfactory legislation. 

DRAFT: AMENDMENT TO COLORADO CONSTITUTION FOR GOLD STAR WIVES PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

 I'm not sure yet whether a constitutional amendment is needed or whether a far easier legislative
approach will work. Thus, the necessity of drafting a bill and an amendment -let Denver decide!

Here's the amendment: 

                                                           

                                                        BALLET TITLE

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution Article X Section 3.5 concerning the disabled veteran’s survivor property tax exemption, and, in connection therewith, provide for qualification of the surviving spouse of a servicemember of the Armed Forces of the United States who is missing in action or whose death is in the line of duty, and provide for the qualification of the surviving spouse of a servicemember of the Colorado National Guard whose death is in the line of duty while activated for a state contingency?

                                                             Bill Summary

(Note:  This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

Under current law, 50 percent of the first $200,000 of actual value of the owner-occupied primary residence of a qualifying senior or a qualifying disabled veteran or surviving spouse of a qualifying disabled veteran who is in receipt of the exemption at the time of death, is exempt from property taxation. This wording excludes a surviving spouse of a servicemember whose death is while on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States and excludes a surviving spouse of a servicemember of the Colorado National Guard whose death is while activated for a state contingency. The amendment expands the definition of “veteran who is in receipt of the exemption at the time of death” to include a servicemember of the Armed Forces of the United States who is missing in action or whose death is in the line of duty and to include a servicemember of the Colorado National Guard whose death is while activated for a state contingency.

SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR A QUALIFYING SURVIVING SPOUSE TO INCLUDE THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A MEMBER OF UNITED STATES MILITARY UNITED STATES WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY, AND TO A SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHOSE DEATH WAS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCY.

                                                                Text of measure

Be It Resolved by the Senate of the Sixty-fifth General Assembly of the State of Colorado, the House of Representatives concurring herein: 

SECTION 1. At the next election at which SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 22-xxx1 question may be submitted, there shall be submitted to the registered electors of the state of Colorado, for their approval or rejection, the following amendment to the constitution of the state of Colorado, to wit: Section 3.5 (1) (b) of article X of the constitution of the state of Colorado is amended, and the said section 3.5 is further amended BY THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING NEW TEXT, to read:

Be it enacted by the people of the State of Colorado:

Article X is amended to add as follows: Add to Section 3.5 (1.5)(b)

Homestead exemption for qualifying senior citizens and disabled veterans AND SURVIVING SPOUSES.

(1) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2002, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property, as defined by law, that, as of the assessment date, is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of the owner-occupier shall be exempt from property taxation if: 

(a) The owner-occupier is sixty-five years of age or older as of the assessment date and has owned and occupied such residential real property as his or her primary residence for the ten years immediately preceding the assessment date; or 

(b) The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1); OR QUALIFYING SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A UNITED STATES MILITARY MEMBER MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY, OR A COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD MEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY.

(c) FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2022, ONLY, the owner-occupier, as of the assessment date, is a disabled veteran. (1.3) an owner-occupier may claim only one exemption per property tax year even if the owner-occupier qualifies for an exemption under both paragraph (c) of subsection (1) of this section and either paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section. 

(1.5) for purposes of this section, "disabled veteran" means (A) an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal Department of Veterans Affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the Department of Homeland Security, or the department of the Army, Navy, or Air Force, OR (B) A UNITED STATES MILITARY MEMBER MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY, OR A COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD MEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY.

SECTION 2. Each elector voting at said election and desirous of voting for or against said amendment shall cast a vote as provided by law either "Yes" or "No" on the proposition: "AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SURVIVING SPOUSES OF ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY MEMBER MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY, OR OF A COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD MEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY 

SECTION 3. The votes cast for the adoption or rejection of said amendment shall be canvassed and the result determined in the manner provided by law for the canvassing of votes for representatives in Congress, and if a majority of the electors voting on the question shall have voted "Yes", the said amendment shall become a part of the state constitution.

For purposes of this section, the text of Section 3.5 shall be expanded, to wit “owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption OR A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH IS IN THE LINE OF DUTY AND TO INCLUDE A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHOSE DEATH IS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY.

(1) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2002, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property, as defined by law, that, as of the assessment date, is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of the owner-occupier shall be exempt from property taxation if: 

(a) The owner-occupier is sixty-five years of age or older as of the assessment date and has owned and occupied such residential real property as his or her primary residence for the ten years immediately preceding the assessment date; 

(b) The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH IS IN THE LINE OF DUTY AND TO INCLUDE A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHOSE DEATH IS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY OR an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1); or 

(c) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, only, the owner-occupier, as of the assessment date, is a disabled veteran. (1.3) An owner-occupier may claim only one exemption per property tax year even if the owner-occupier qualifies for an exemption under both paragraph (c) of subsection (1) of this section owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption FOR PURPOSES OF ARTICLE X SECTION 3.5 ONLY, “OWNER-OCCUPIER WHO PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION” SHALL ALSO INCLUDE A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH IS IN THE LINE OF DUTY AND ALSO INCLUDE A SERVICEMEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHOSE DEATH IS WHILE ACTIVATED FOR A STATE CONTINGENCY.

Self-executing, severability, conflicting provisions. ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION ARE SELF-EXECUTING EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, ARE SEVERABLE, AND, EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THE TEXT, ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON OFFICIAL DECLARATION OF THE VOTE HEREON BY PROCLAMATION OF THE GOVERNOR, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1(4) OF ARTICLE V.

  

Modified Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption Bill - Added MIA

 The draft bill was modified to include missing in action (MIA) casualties and list some of the proofs that should suffice for a claim. 

While MIA would be an unlikely event, the language is to avoid situations like the Vietnam War where servicemembers were sometimes missing for years and their families left in limbo, denied essential benefits.

Here's the updated text:

Seeking support within United Veterans Coalition for Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption

Given that Colorado's United Veterans Coalition requires unanimous agreement on a legislative objective, it seems best to begin asking the various member organizations for a chance to discuss Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. As I understand the process, issues are put forward in June to begin consideration and the agenda is decided upon in November. 

The American Legion has already advanced its resolution asking UVC to consider the Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. Efforts are also underway to discuss the issue with other groups.  UVC has to balance the many concerns it faces, and Gold Star Wives property tax exemption is but one that bears discussion. 

That discussion has already begun with some veterans' organizations and will continue by reaching out to each organization's UVC member representative. Their input is important but the only suggestion thus far is to limit the effort within UVC, respecting its role as the principal voice of Colorado's 460,000 veterans.

It is still unclear about whether a constitutional or legislative solution will be required, but a couple drafts for both approaches are ready for review. Hopefully, the legislature can act and avoid the difficult process of a constitutional amendment. That's a question for the Legislative Council Staff or the Office of Legislative Legal Services but not right now: As with meeting with our legislators, it is necessary to wait until this very busy session wraps up in early June.

 

LEGISLATIVE ACTION: Two possible changes to Article X Section 3.5 to add Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption

Perhaps adding Gold Star Wives to the Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption can be done in a couple different ways. A constitutional amendment is much harder than in earlier years, but legislation or regulatory action might be easier. It bears looking into!

Here are two possible legislative actions, easy-to-use keys we might use by hacking the definition of "disabled veteran" to encompass an active duty death of a soldier, sailor airman or Marine, or a Colorado National Guard member ordered to active state duty:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-3-202, amend 3 (3.5) as follows: 4 39-3-202. Definitions. As used in this part 2, unless the context 5 otherwise requires:

(FIRST possible revision)

(b)  The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection OR THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIED IN THE LINE OF DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHILE ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES

SECOND possible revision)

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, OR AIR FORCE. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIES IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES IS DEEMED A DISABLED VETERAN PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

 

SITREP: Report to the Colorado Gold Star Wives re: Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemptiopn

Here's my 8 May update to the Gold Star Wives:

Good evening, 

I agreed to provide you an update of things of interest regarding the property tax exemption for Gold Star Wives. Here it is.

The first item is that some legislators and staff were of the impression Colorado might have upwards of a thousand survivors. This is wildly off from the estimate of 150 potential applicants that the Legislative Council Staff calculated in 2019 for Representative Kipp. With a modest budget impact of less than $100,000 this looks more and more reasonable.

I've asked for but haven't been able to get any information from UVC about GSW being a 2022 legislative objective, which is the timing you suggested when we spoke. 

Their gentle suggestion seemed to be that I should back off but that it would be okay to stay tuned to UVC web info. Rather than being so uselessly passive, silent and merely hopeful, it seems more appropriate to remain proactive within UVC and also follow UVC guidance to keep my elected representatives advised. It seems useful to get coalition members informed and supportive of your exemption now so it can be presented in June and voted on by this November – if I understand the UVC timing.

To that end, my American Legion post and district submitted an internal resolution that, if approved at our June meeting, informs the UVC of the Legion's request for placement on the 2022 objectives. Nothing more explicit, and all within UVC channels. If it fails to get UVC behind it next year as well, at least there was an effort.

As you and I agreed, National Guard troops who die when activated for state contingencies are referenced in this Legion resolution. I spoke with Guard and DMVA folks about the issue: a Guardsman's surviving spouse is protected with something like DIC but more generous at about $2800/month. It would be an unlikely event but if it ever does happen it absolutely right that their spouses be protected!

As you can read, the resolution doesn't actually do much in that it only directs the Legion's UVC delegate to ask the coalition to consider GSW. Details are left for the professionals to iron out if/when/however the coalition wishes:

RESOLVED, by the American Legion Department of Colorado) that unremarried Gold Star Wives and unremarried surviving spouses of State National Guard members who die while activated by the Governor for State service, be included in the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption because it is both necessary and proper, that the United Veterans Coalition be informed for this to be part of its state legislative objectives until acted upon with a goal of implementation before 2023 

--
As a Gold Star Family Member (CW4 Hank Carter, WWII, Korea, Vietnam,) this means a lot to me personally! In different circumstances it could have been my own GSW mom or my wife to be affected. It would affect survivors of crewmembers I've lost: Paul, Gabby, The Gif, Larry, Turcottte, Art, Bill, Bob, Arch, Fred and others.

If anything, I'm more concerned about this now than at our UVC banquet a couple years back when I introduced you and David Ortiz to then-Congressman Polis and to VA acting Deputy Secretary Scott Blackburn (our speaker that night.) This illogical distinction between GSW and disabled vets must be eliminated. If it had been done properly from the exemption's launch, each GSW would have saved over $8000 by 2022!

Whenever you have the time, I'd appreciate a cup of coffee and some discussion. The clip below is what I did for an informative panel.

God bless!

American Legion District 4 Approves Gold Star Resolution for 2022 Action

The Fort Collins Legion post forwarded its unanimously-approved Gold Star Wives resolution to Legion District 4. This morning, the nineteen posts represented unanimously approved the resolution and District 4 now forwards it to Department.. The next step is to convince the department resolution committee and then, it will be put to all delegates. 

Then, the Legion delegate presents the issue to the United Veterans Coalition.

This is very encouraging. The resolution asks the UVC, where both the Legion and the Gold Star Wives are members, to advocate inclusion of survivors of active-duty military line of duty deaths in the Colorado Disabled Veteran Survivor property tax exemption.

We should know more about the Legion's Department of Colorado decision this month!

Opposition to extending the property tax exemption is considerable, with most concern being the tight state budget. Finding $100,000 shouldn't be impossible, given that the general category of homestead exemptions for seniors, disabled military and survivors is $149,000,000; we're asking only for 0.0006 of an increase. 

I realize there is also coordinated opposition by some worried veterans, concerned about the groundwork underway to advance this within UVC. Perhaps there's some area of conflict with other coalition priorities or conflict caused by an outsider (me) trying to get UVC help going forward – nobody has said.

I'm a little concerned about UVC suggestions that any concerns, even these about which I care deeply) are best left altogether to them. I don't want to stand aside to see whether or not the coalition opts to advance GSW. It would seem better strategy, with no conflict of my causing, to advocate among primary members for their support. As I read the 2019 email, the task is getting issues into consideration by June and decided upon for inclusion of GSW with the legislative agenda.

At this point, my objective is still (1) get UVC member organizations aware of the Gold Star Wives property tax exemption (2) get the unanimous UVC member organizations' approval to include this issue in the UVC 2022 state legislative agenda (3) bring this to the attention of interested state legislators to draft a bill and update LCS research from their 2019 review

It has been six years since UVC last considered Gold Star Wives when I asked. Nothing formal ever followed – no bills, no committee hearings. It simply disappeared without action back in 2016. For 2022, We must not meekly stand aside, passively watching and wondering if UVC will act in 2022. 

With the offer of a bill to be introduced in June, and with the hoped-for UVC leadership and support (rather than disappointment with me and undoing my efforts) the issue should have a chance of reaching the legislature, maybe even into law by the summer of 2022.

Farewell, MOAA and my 30-year membership.

No help here!

I've ended my 31-year membership in the Military Officers Association of America, resigning last week. Leadership's brief response to my request for support (copy below) or advice on property tax exemptions for surviving spouses of active-duty military wasn't helpful and didn't deal with the issue. The only answer was that the Colorado MOAA representative would decide whether to support or not, and whether to speak with me or not. 

There wasn't even an offer to bring my concerns about Gold Star Wives and Colorado's TDIU veterans to the MOAA representative.

In essence, I was told by leadership that my effort as a life member to express my need for MOAA help within the United Veterans Coalition was dependent upon and at the sole discretion of our lobbyist. 

MOAA's rep hasn't found an opportunity for me to discuss my hope for MOAA support within the Colorado United Veterans Coalition. My specific request was for MOAA to advocate veterans' issues as per our mission statement. I was sent an email on how the United Veterans Coalition handles legislative objectives but nothing regarding how MOAA could help, nor whether MOAA agreed or disagreed with my concern's solution.

Being denied my voice, permitted any discussion of my needs only upon invitation of another (no matter how kind or skillful or even supportive the lobbyist may be) is unacceptable. This is an MOAA gag. Are officers expected to wait around, mute and dependent on others deciding what's best for us?

Rather than have my affiliation as a member affirm MOAA inaction, disinterest, or perhaps even opposition to my needs, I have terminated my life membership. Now I hope to bring up the issue with other UVC-affiliated groups, seeking their support to place Gold Star Wives and TDIU veterans on its 2022 legislative agenda.

What I wrote MOAA to ask for help:

I'm a life MOAA member and ask your help. Good afternoon. I don't know the complexities of getting an MOAA resolution but hope for your advice. If appropriate, please consider this a motion under the appropriate rules for such a thing.

Our state restricts the small Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption to those whose spouse died while already in receipt of the exemption. This language makes it impossible for "Gold Star Wives: (name change underway to Spouses) to qualify because their troop died on duty and never came home to apply for the exemption An obvious and gruesome "Catch-22." 

There are about 150 or so widows/widowers not already covered under the Homestead Exemption. I'm not addressing Gold Star Wives' second category, spouses of vets who die after the military of service-connected causes because the current language includes them. Legislative Affairs Council estimates the cost to Colorado to be under $100,000.

I'd like to correct this via our membership in the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado. I assume we either agree upon supporting something as an informal process or some sort of resolution. I've drafted such a resolution for discussion.

Please help me correct this discrimination of active duty widows who should be receiving the same respect and honor as do Colorado's disabled veteran survivors.

Several years back, MOAA was much more responsive when I visited headquarters in Washington along with Dr. Jeanie Stellman from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. MOAA and ROA, the American Legion, NPR, even Air Force Times all lent their support throughout the four year effort getting our crews C-123 Agent Orange coverage.

So, thanks again, MOAA, but farewell. I'm not able to travel to Washington again to find somebody in MOAA to hear me out.

May 2015 MOAA Magazine

 

"...in keeping with our legislative agenda" - United Veterans Coalition Champions Veterans' Issues for Colorado. When the time is right, Gold Star Wives' concerns WILL be heard!

Four hundred and sixty thousand loud, strong voices.  

At the right time,, I'm hopeful these thousands of veterans will be convincing our General Assembly that Gold Star Wives should be eligible for the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption.

But this just isn't the right moment for GSW property tax issues. The benefit will be sought in the near future, just not right now. And it wasn't right back in 2016 when our state legislative agenda included Gold Star survivors but no traction was found, not even a draft bill.

UVC is "the tip of the spear" for our state's veterans. Speaking as one voice, coordinating dozens of organizations state-wide. VFW, DAV, American Legion, PVA, MOAA, NCOA, ROA, AFSA, VVA, and so many others of which I'm not a member – Submarine Veterans, Gold Star Wives - if an association serves vets and their families, if an organization promotes the national defense, they're a welcome part part of UVC and their concerns are heard. The various needs and propositions are discussed by the membership, and those agreed by UVC are delivered to the decision makers, both state and federal, in the form of the annual focused UVC legislative objectives.  

Legislators in Denver and Washington listen carefully, hearing those thousands of UVC voices when the United Veterans Coalition speaks. Whether addressing an individual legislator, senate or house committee, or public forum like a town hall meeting or city council, the United Veterans Coalition commands attention, and rightfully so.

I know this. On a few occasions, I was a witness before the National Academies of Science or one of the house or senate committees, and authorized to speak on behalf of the UVC. UVC was firmly behind me as I sought Agent Orange benefits for C-123 veterans. We got all of Colorado's senators and congressional representatives together to pressure the VA, even to block presidential nominations from consideration until VA acted. Finally, we won on the merit of the issue and UVC strength. 

We won the four year battle and gained VA Agent Orange benefits for 2500 Air Force C-123 aircrew, maintainers and survivors. Until Congress acted on the Blue Water Navy group, this was the only time VA added a new Agent Orange exposure group, and the only expansion of Agent Orange benefits since 1991. With HB16-1444 we won property tax exemptions for Colorado 450 military retirees and their survivors who'd been medically separated from their service as 100% disabled, and in doing so we brought the legislation into agreement with our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5. 

Not only does the UVC present veterans' concerns to our legislator, UVC also prioritizes the multitude of issues and forms an annual legislative agenda for both state and federal issues.

The UVC legislative agenda is already firmly set for 2021, but has yet to be finalized for 2022. Whether or not Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption is identified as an objective is up to the primary members and lobbyists of UVC. The coalition sorts out our needs, identifies the possible, and prioritizes them. Presto, the annual legislative agenda.

At the right time, Gold Star Wives' property tax issue is likely to be addressed by the coalition. Admirably, the GSW members are patient and understanding, with full confidence in the coalition.

The timing for GSW isn't right for 2021. Complexities of state budget, coalition priorities. Strategy and resources – all must align, and then UVC will deliver for the members of Colorado's Gold Star Wives. Let's get together for Gold Star Wives' proper place on the UVC 2022 legislative agenda!

Colorado's Gold Star Wives' Catch-22

Catch-22

Just think about this. 

Colorado has a modest property tax savings just for totally disabled veterans, totally disabled military retirees, and for their survivors. I am referring to the Colorado Disabled Veterans Survivor Property Tax Exemption program. Saves about $600 each for those qualified, with a goal of helping disabled vets and survivors get or keep homes after suffering lifelong total disabilities in the Nation's service.

Think about this also: Colorado refuses this very modest property tax exemption to survivors of military who die in the line of duty on active federal service. None of my county's 245 recipients of the exemption is a war widow or widower, AKA a "Gold Star Spouse."  In fact, there isn't a single one in all of Colorado.

Surviving spouses of active duty military lost in the line of duty just don't qualify. Until we change the rules, they never will. The core problem is that the rules limit the property tax exemption to the disabled vet, and then the survivor if and only if the veteran was receiving it at the time of death.

If you're a civilian, take it from me; While in the process of crashing your airplane, sinking your ship, or getting a bullet through your helmet, it is awkward to first take a few moments out before dying to apply for and be approved for the Colorado exemption. Actually, time does not permit.

You've heard the phrase "Catch-22" for a no-win and absurd situation, a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations. We've certainly invented a whopper with Colorado Constitution Article X Section 3.5 and HB14-1373. 

This macabre situation boils down to coming home alive but disabled after service and save a little money on your property taxes versus dying on duty so your spouse can pay more property taxes. What great choices!

Not that any soldier, sailor, airman or Marine gets to make such a choice; too often, guys in uniforms much different than ours decide that for us by shooting or launching RPG's in our direction. 

Next stop: either:
  (1) the nearest field hospital or
  (2) an aluminum casket with Old Glory across it.

Catch-22. Colorado's Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption.