SITREP 18 May 2021: Report to Colorado Gold Star Wives re: Property Tax Exemption

(an update)

Good evening. I trust  you've had a pleasant weekend.

I should run a couple items past you. There will probably be some confusion about whether an act of the legislature or a constitutional amendment will be necessary for Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in 2022.

UVC practice is to have a member organization (in this case, GSW) submit proposed state legislative objectives in June for a hoped-for unanimous vote by the coalition; putting it to the UVC or not remains strictly your call, of course.

I've prepared a draft bill and a draft amendment.. They are terribly amateurish and too long, but hopefully get my point across. Read, don't read, revise, dump'em as you wish. They shouldn't be submitted if in conflict with your objectives or other UVC agenda items.

As you asked, provisions are made for the Colorado National Guard survivors as well as spouses of military missing in action. The situation during Vietnam had many families in limbo, confused between survivor and active duty benefits for years. This isn't a situation likely to happen but...just in case.

Last, I redefined "veteran" to include those lost on active duty or missing in action.

The choice between amendment or legislation will be made by whichever house initiates action, and by Legislative Council Staff or by the Office of Legislative Legal Services. Fortunately, LCS did an analysis for Rep. Kipp back in 2019 that might help should you and UVC proceed. 

For a member's suggestion of a legislative objective, UVC also requires a statement as to how the proposition helps veterans, and for both it is "Improve survivor benefits, promote stable home ownership, support the Colorado National Guard."

I copied you earlier on the American Legion resolution asking UVC to support GSW property tax exemption. It goes before the state Legion in late June. Nineteen posts have already given their unanimous support. Again, all efforts were directed only towards asking UVC to make it an objective for 2o22, and of course they can disregard if they wish.

There are a couple representatives and senators who are interested in GSW, and available for discussion once this session wraps up. I've never heard from David Ortiz but perhaps someone who knows him can reach out in June.

I've tried to follow the suggestions from your UVC lobbyists as well as input by the Guard, former UVC leaders, my own Gold Star Family members and some survivors from my own church here in Fort Collins. I'll leave the issue now for you to do whatever the Colorado Gold Star Wives chapters decide. God bless you all.

My very best regards,

        Wes Carter

Modified Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption Bill - Added MIA

 The draft bill was modified to include missing in action (MIA) casualties and list some of the proofs that should suffice for a claim. 

While MIA would be an unlikely event, the language is to avoid situations like the Vietnam War where servicemembers were sometimes missing for years and their families left in limbo, denied essential benefits.

Here's the updated text:

Farewell, MOAA and my 30-year membership.

No help here!

I've ended my 31-year membership in the Military Officers Association of America, resigning last week. Leadership's brief response to my request for support (copy below) or advice on property tax exemptions for surviving spouses of active-duty military wasn't helpful and didn't deal with the issue. The only answer was that the Colorado MOAA representative would decide whether to support or not, and whether to speak with me or not. 

There wasn't even an offer to bring my concerns about Gold Star Wives and Colorado's TDIU veterans to the MOAA representative.

In essence, I was told by leadership that my effort as a life member to express my need for MOAA help within the United Veterans Coalition was dependent upon and at the sole discretion of our lobbyist. 

MOAA's rep hasn't found an opportunity for me to discuss my hope for MOAA support within the Colorado United Veterans Coalition. My specific request was for MOAA to advocate veterans' issues as per our mission statement. I was sent an email on how the United Veterans Coalition handles legislative objectives but nothing regarding how MOAA could help, nor whether MOAA agreed or disagreed with my concern's solution.

Being denied my voice, permitted any discussion of my needs only upon invitation of another (no matter how kind or skillful or even supportive the lobbyist may be) is unacceptable. This is an MOAA gag. Are officers expected to wait around, mute and dependent on others deciding what's best for us?

Rather than have my affiliation as a member affirm MOAA inaction, disinterest, or perhaps even opposition to my needs, I have terminated my life membership. Now I hope to bring up the issue with other UVC-affiliated groups, seeking their support to place Gold Star Wives and TDIU veterans on its 2022 legislative agenda.

What I wrote MOAA to ask for help:

I'm a life MOAA member and ask your help. Good afternoon. I don't know the complexities of getting an MOAA resolution but hope for your advice. If appropriate, please consider this a motion under the appropriate rules for such a thing.

Our state restricts the small Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption to those whose spouse died while already in receipt of the exemption. This language makes it impossible for "Gold Star Wives: (name change underway to Spouses) to qualify because their troop died on duty and never came home to apply for the exemption An obvious and gruesome "Catch-22." 

There are about 150 or so widows/widowers not already covered under the Homestead Exemption. I'm not addressing Gold Star Wives' second category, spouses of vets who die after the military of service-connected causes because the current language includes them. Legislative Affairs Council estimates the cost to Colorado to be under $100,000.

I'd like to correct this via our membership in the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado. I assume we either agree upon supporting something as an informal process or some sort of resolution. I've drafted such a resolution for discussion.

Please help me correct this discrimination of active duty widows who should be receiving the same respect and honor as do Colorado's disabled veteran survivors.

Several years back, MOAA was much more responsive when I visited headquarters in Washington along with Dr. Jeanie Stellman from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. MOAA and ROA, the American Legion, NPR, even Air Force Times all lent their support throughout the four year effort getting our crews C-123 Agent Orange coverage.

So, thanks again, MOAA, but farewell. I'm not able to travel to Washington again to find somebody in MOAA to hear me out.

May 2015 MOAA Magazine

 

Can a deceased active duty soldier be defined as a "totally disabled veteran" for his/her Colorado survivors' benefits?

Wouldn't that be wonderful! And – maybe – easy also?

Because our state restricts survivor benefits to those whose veterans were already in receipt of the exemption at the time of death, we lock out from all such benefits survivors of troops who die on active duty. Perhaps we can use the existing language of the law. 

Perhaps, only changing the interpretation or definition of the words "totally disabled veteran already in receipt of the exemption" to something like "or active duty death considered to be 'totally disabled and already in receipt of the exemption."

 

GOLD STAR WIVES POSTER - COLORADO PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION