A DISABLED VETERAN AND MILITARY RETIREE LOOKS AT HB23-1084 -Continuation of Military Retirement Benefit Deduction in Colorado

This measure deserves the full support of the Colorado legislature and the voters. It certainly has mine!

HB23-1084 is important. It carries a small and reasonable cost that brings advantages to the state well beyond the investment. It should be approved this session.

DECLARATION: Neither this bill nor HB23-1002 will affect me as my retirements are already exempt from Colorado’s income tax. I am a VA-rated 100% disabled veteran and also a 26-year military retiree separated from the Air Force at a 100% medical disability, thus my state income tax is already exempt for other provisions of the law.

At first glance, I believed HB23-1002 for disabled veterans should be a priority over HB23-1084. Instead, I now urge approval of both measures because they are good for veterans and great for Colorado. This year both bills are firmly supported by the United Veterans of Colorado.

Since 2011 I’ve urged legislative action to help other totally disabled veterans and thus have long supported measures such as HB23-1002. Colorado’s constitution currently provides a partial property tax exemption to VA-rated 100% disabled vets but fails to address VA’s second category of disabled veterans who are totally disabled, those the VA rates as “totally disabled for individual unemployability (TDIU.)

HB23-1052 addresses that oversight and supports nearly 3,000 of Colorado’s most seriously and totally disabled veterans whose injuries or illnesses prevent any employment. I expected to strongly favor only this initiative because of the moral imperative of meeting the needs of these vets. 

I’ve changed my view. I see both measures as vital legislation for Colorado in 2023, particularly because HB23-1084 is an economic “no-brainer,” bringing much more to Colorado than it costs

Retired military who chose Colorado as their home following active duty do so for many reasons. Clearly, important among them is a favorable treatment of their military retirement income. Colorado currently exempts a modest portion of a military pension; HB23-1084 merely extends it to 2034. This measure pays for itself far beyond its modest cost,

In 2021 28 states exempted all of a military retirement from state income taxes, and that number rose to 32 in 2022. Eleven states, including Colorado, currently offer an exemption for at least some portion of a military retirement. Seven states and the District of Columbia have no military pension exemption. To our disadvantage, Colorado will join that short list in 2024 unless HB23-1084 is approved to continue our partial exemption.

Governments and legislators see the importance of being “veteran-friendly” but unfortunately Colorado only ranks a modest 27th among the states.

Being “military-friendly” recognizes a retiree’s long service to the state and nation and it makes great economic sense. Thanks in part to the current partial exemption provided military pensions in Colorado, our 50,000 retired military have brought their steady retirement income. Most brought their military experience, skills and knowledge to join our workforce or start their own businesses as second careers. Servicemembers already here have been encouraged to stay after leaving active service, and others selected our state as their new home, in part because of the current partial exemption for military pensions.

States value retired military members because they bolster the state economy by bringing retirement income and non-taxed VA benefits, like the GI Bill. Typically, their federal benefits leave them independent of state support services. According to a California study considering state taxation of military pensions, researchers determined there would be significantly more jobs, millions added to total personal income, billions added to gross state product and to business sales if military pensions were exempted.

Another recent study by the Towson University Regional Economic Studies Institute (RESI), found that “If (the state) does not exempt military retired pay from state income taxes … countless other service members and their families will opt to retire to military retiree-friendly states.”

The Towson study also stated that when military retirees reenter the workforce, their taxable income generates an economic impact in addition to that of their military pensions. Their second careers can last from 15 to 20 years. Military retiree household spending — groceries, rent, mortgage payments, automobile purchases and recreation spending, to name a few items — also benefits the economy. As average to above-average wage earners, these are the folks Colorado wants to attract and keep.

HB23-1084 is a golden opportunity to increase state revenues by passing legislation that would continue to partially exempt military retired pay from state income tax. This legislation would help stem a migration of skilled and experienced personnel who retire from the military and leave Colorado because of state income tax higher than other states.

Military vets are good neighbors who pay their bills, volunteer in the community and have an appreciable level of discretionary income. Most other states have learned this and realize that exempting military pensions from state income taxes means losing a little in revenue but building a stronger fiscal base by increasing the total number of state taxpayers. States that understand the economics of exempting military retired pay reap the benefits that come with creating an attractive fiscal landscape. 

We need to keep our “landscape” military-friendly with HB23-1084.

VA Benefits for a “Traditional Reservist?”

Absolutely! Hearing injuries resulting from armor, heavy weapons, flight or aircraft maintenance duties might qualify you for VA compensation and other benefits. Here’s how. 

Traditional reservists aren’t eligible for most VA benefits because “active duty for training” doesn’t count towards true veteran status – even if it is a year or more such as Undergraduate Pilot Training. Regardless of how long one’s initial active duty for basic and technical school might be, the law doesn’t recognize that as “active service.” 

VA recognizes completion of an active-duty enlistment, or active duty during wartime to qualify a servicemember for benefits, but UTAs, annual tour, active duty for basic and other training are grouped into ineligible “active duty for training.” No bennies. 

BUT – there’s a big exception to that if you experience a disabling injury or disease. Tinnitus is just one such injury. That ringing in the ears, or wind noise or low hum is caused by loud noises. Noises like a C-123 or C-130 makes. Noises like an M-16 makes at 154dB.

Flyers, tank crews, infantry, artillery and others around loud noises in a military setting often suffer tinnitus, and VA recognizes that as a frequent disability - in fact, it is the most common disability veterans have. 

If you have tinnitus or hearing loss you might be entitled to VA care and compensation for that disability, and if you are, that makes you a veteran with all the benefits that wartime veterans receive. Benefits that you’ve earned from damage done your ears.

I looked into this in December 2020 to help a man who was an army reservist with tinnitus from his basic training back in 1968.  He fired the M-14 rifle and did not have any ear protection. Noises of 85 dB and above can cause permanent hearing loss and tinnitus, and our aircraft are far noisier than that: The C-130 cockpit is steady at over 112 dB. The noise is even worse in the aircraft rear! 

After my altitude chamber ride at Edwards AFB I started flying C-130 transports in 1974. I recall that by 1976 or so we received the 3M yellow foam earplugs. They only provided some protection from noise hazards but it was all we had plus our crew headsets; even together they were of little help. 

There was still significant noise reaching the inner ear to cause damage. This kind of damage is permanent and cumulative and can evidence itself in worsening tinnitus and/or hearing loss even years later. 

Here is my point in the VA’s own words: 

“When a claim for service connection is based on a period of active duty for training, there must be evidence that the individual concerned became disabled as a result of a disease or injury incurred or aggravated in the line of duty during the period of active duty for training.”

That is per 38 U.S.C. § 1131 (see also 38 U.S.C. § 1110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a). See CAVC Hensley v. Brown –

  “claimant may establish direct service connection for a hearing disability initially manifest several years after separation from service on the basis of evidence showing that the current hearing loss is causally related to injury or disease suffered in service.”( 5 Vet. App. 155, 164 (1993).” Also see VA Training Letter 10-02 at 15 (rescinded re: incorporation into VBA Adjudication Procedures Manual (M21-1), pt. III, subpt. iv, ch. 4, § D.1-3) 

VA compensation for a 10% tinnitus disability is a modest $144 per month. For someone who served in the reserve components the real importance here isn't the money but rather a hearing injury establishes legal veteran status with all the benefits that attach to being a wartime veteran (we’ve been in a period of war ever since Desert Storm.) 

Sometimes there are secondary issues to adding to hearing loss like depression or hypertension. There can even be tertiary issues, something like hearing loss causing depression which is known to cause heart issues. Rarely, there have been vets getting up to 50% disability ( benefits plus $995/month) based on hearing loss and complications. 

You might not need them now, but benefits can include elderly/low-income pension rights, medical and pharmacy (perhaps with modest co-payments,) rehab, hearing aids, VA home loan, education, and even a new program for veterans called Veteran Directed Care. 

It is for vets faced with significant loss of ADLs (activities of daily life.)
There is no disability rating required, only that a vet be enrolled in VA health care, and with it help can be offered for whatever ADL shortfalls the vet experiences.

If you believe you have tinnitus or hearing loss, or maybe some other issue that began during service and still affects you, get advice from the VA hotline, one of the veterans’ service organizations like DAV or VFW, or your city/state VA office. Get a claim entered immediately because benefits are dated from when VA gets your claim, not when they approve it months later. 

Late note: the Army reservist whose claim I helped prepare got a welcome disability rating of 40% service connection (backdated to date of his application) when VA approved his claim in early June 2021; he has a couple issues still pending that could increase the award significantly. This all went back to hearing injuries during basic training and AIT over half a century ago; good thing he saved, the documentation from his sick call and hospital treatments!

I hope this helps someone!

Wes Carter, USAF Retired

Medical Service Corps

Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) Property Tax Exemption Briefer and TDIU slide show (QR Codes)

1. SCAN or CLICK to download TDIU Briefing File

2. SCAN or CLICK for TDIU Briefing Slides

 

June 26: American Legion Votes Support of Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption

This morning the Department of Colorado of the American Legion, meeting at their annual conference in Colorado Springs, approved a resolution for Gold Star Wives inclusion in the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption program.

The resolution initiated with the Legion post in Fort Collins. 

The Legion's resolution urges UVC to include the issue in its 2022 state legislative agenda. The coalition's agenda is yet be finalized. Obviously the legislature itself must agree to a solution during the next session.

Left unclear is whether a constitutional amendment or an act of the legislature will be the preferred approach.

The Legion's approved resolution joins that of the Military and Veterans Affairs Committee of the Colorado Bar Association, plus our own from the C-123 Veterans Association. It remains for the Gold Star Wives, not third parties, to actually initiate UVC consideration of this issue.
(click: resolution of American Legion Department of Colorado)

COLORADO SENATE SNUBBED FAMILIES – KILLED GOLD STAR WIVES' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

June 7 2021: Colorado Senate killed Gold Star Wives bill for
given survivors of totally disabled veterans (HCR21-1002

Last week the Colorado Senate really disappointed me. It killed a bill to include Gold Star Wives (widows of troops who die in the line of duty) the same small property tax exemption given widows of totally disabled veterans.

Did senators think our widows don't need the exemption to keep their homes and survive on the puny $1350 per month VA death benefit?

Thousands of survivors of Colorado's disabled vets already get this exemption as they should – but the Senate refused it to our 140 Gold Star Wives. These survivors are denied the exemption only because their servicemembers died in the line of duty on active duty rather than as disabled veterans after active duty.

Esteemed Senators: did you give this any thought before you killed HCR21-1002, passed unanimously by the House?

 

C-123 Veterans Association Joins Colorado's United Veterans Coalition

To better support state and federal veterans' issues, The C-123 Veterans Association has affiliated with Colorado's United Veterans Coalition (UVC.) UVC is the single most effective voice for over 350,000 veterans in Colorado. It brings together the VA and nearly every interested organization and political entity in the state.

RADM Dick Young USNR (Ret.) was elected president last week. UVC will celebrate is annual banquet on June 27 and tickets are still available.

Did Colorado OVERTAX 100% Disabled Veterans an EXTRA $3.6M in Property Taxes?

Yes. It appears that for nearly fifteen years Colorado has accidentally but unconstitutionally overcharged hundreds of our 100% disabled military veterans by $4,050,000! Nearly seven percent of the totally disabled military veterans in Colorado are involved.This is a complicated constitutional argument to follow, so have fun! (The final paragraph provides the reasoning behind the $4.1M unfairly taxed from vets.)

In 2007 voters approved Referendum E to create Article X Section 3.5, qualifying 100% disabled military veterans a partial property tax exemption similar to the senior exemption. This had been referred to the voters by the legislature for constitutional amendment as S.C.R. 06-001:

"Property tax exemption for disabled veterans. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, extends the existing property tax exemption for qualifying seniors to any United States military veteran, including any member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, who has been separated from service under honorable conditions and who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability. Requires the state to compensate local governments for property tax revenues lost as a result of the extension of the exemption."

For following this issue today, the relevant part of Article X Section 3.5, the amendment created by Referendum E is:

"(1.5) For purposes of this section, 'disabled veteran' means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force"

The legislature then turned to provide an enabling statute to implement the new amendment, passing HB07-1251:

"(3.5) 'QUALIFYING DISABLED VETERAN' MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT AND TOTAL DISABILITY PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT."

HB07-1251 begat the tax details in C.R.S. Section 39-3-202 which read (until 2016 with HB16-1444):

(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department.

By the plain reading of the new constitutional amendment, all a qualified vet would have to do is present a copy of their VA certification or proof of medical retirement from the armed forces as totally disabled in the line of duty. Both were specified in  Article X Section 3.5 because some military retirees never seek a VA disability – a number estimated by the state at about 450.

The problem causing vets being forced to pay extra property taxes by being denied the exemption arose when the constitutional amendment in Referendum E was implemented in tax statutes. The Legislature passed HB07-1251 and in doing so, forgot (neglected, opted against) to include the last fifteen words of Article X Section 3.5 – "the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force"

Do you see it? Compare the last fifteen words in Article X Section 3.5 against subsequent legislation. The lawmakers clearly did not include the referendum's provision for 100% disabled military retirees. Fifteen words left out denied the exemption to about 450 veterans.

By the plain reading of the new constitutional amendment, all a qualified vet would have to do is present a copy of their VA certification or proof of medical retirement from the armed forces as totally disabled in the line of duty. Both were specified in  Article X Section 3.5 because some military retirees never seek a VA disability – a number estimated by the state at about 450. 

Here's our problem: Colorado’s constitution is supreme, trumping statutory law in areas of conflict. Article X Section 3.5 therefore outguns HB07-1251, at least in the part where disabled military retirees are left out of the legislation.

So HB07-1251 seems unconstitutional. Only the Supreme Court can declare it so, but the plain meaning of the words (and of the words not included in the statute) is very clear. 100% disabled military retirees separated by their services should have been receiving our Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption since 2007.

In 2014 along came a 100% disabled military retiree who's application for the exemption was denied by CDMVA. The vet was initially rebuffed, referred back to the statute and various forms. But then he tracked the statutes back to the constitution and Article X Section 3.5. Even reading it a few times wasn't illuminating, at least not until he read it a bit more slowly and noted those missing fifteen words! Eureka!

This could have been resolved by working the issue up to the Supreme Court, but sympathetic advice from DOLA experts proved much more effective – "go to your legislators."

A couple phone calls, a few town hall meetings and many letters and emails later, Senator John Kefalas and other legislators took the bit in their teeth and got HB16-1444 enacted. That happened because the United Veterans Coalition backed the issue by making it a 2006 legislative objective. 

So, this little problem solved, thought the vet. HB16-1444 took effect in 2017 and he got his exemption, although he'd also received a VA 100% rating to replace his initial VA 100% disability rating for TDIU. Then in 2018 he noticed few of the counties updated forms or instructions to include those fifteen last words left out that got the correction.

Off went a missive to DOLA, asking them to urge counties and other state agencies to more closely adhere to the law. DOLA responded quickly, posting another reminder that circulated throughout the state. DOLA also said they'd update their own form and web site information.

Problem solved? No. Checking this month of June 2021, four years after HB16-1444 went into effect, fourteen years after the constitutional mistake was made, DOLA, Treasury, CMDVA and other agencies and most counties still fail to include 100% military disabled retirees.

How did the figure $4,050,000 get calculated?  The number of 450 affected disabled military retirees from state agency reports was multiplied by $600 for the average value of the property tax exemption denied them, then multiplied by fifteen years. Total: $4.1M.  Unconstitutional?

Here is the background paper trail on this issue.

===============================

Here are examples of state or county agencies failing to properly describe qualified veterans:

A. DOLA, CMDVA, Boulder, Douglas, Pacific, Weld, most counties's application

=========================================================

B. Douglas, most other counties' application instruction
===================================================

Property Tax

Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

This program is for Disabled Veterans who:

• Are RATED by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at 100%, Permanently and Totally Disabled by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Individual Unemployability does not qualify) AND

C. Even DOLA and the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs doesn't correct inaccurate information.
====================================================

D.  Treasurer of the state - him, too! Fear of having to give unconstitutionally demanded property taxes back to the
disabled military retireesQ

Colorado Legislature: Sponsor Needed for 100% Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

 TOTAL DISABILITY for INDIVIDUAL UNEMPLOYABILITY
= Equals =
100% VA Total & Permanent Line of Duty Disability

Every Colorado 100% VA disabled veteran should be eligible for the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. It is wrong to deny TDIU vets the exemption the voters approved for ALL 100% VA disabled veterans when we approved Referendum E in 2006, Colorado Constitution Article X Section 3.5

A veteran is considered totally and permanently disabled if they have received a disability rating of 100% for service-connected disability compensation and the VA does not expect the condition to improve. Such language indicates that the rating of total disability is permanent.

By illogically and unfairly denying them a state constitutional protection, Colorado disrespects over 4000 TDIU veterans rated by the VA as 100% totally and permanently disabled in the line of duty. Colorado denies TDIU vets, totally disabled for the rest of their lives, our Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. In doing so Colorado shows its disregard for their dedicated military service and their life-changing sacrifices. 

Colorado is unique among the states in denying benefits to this group of 100% VA disabled veterans.

 

Colorado Legislature: Sponsor Needed for 100% Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

 

Proposed Bill to Support 100% Disabled Veterans

Colorado Legislature: Sponsor Needed for 100% Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

Proposed Bill to Support 100% Disabled Veterans

Modified Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption Bill - Added MIA

 The draft bill was modified to include missing in action (MIA) casualties and list some of the proofs that should suffice for a claim. 

While MIA would be an unlikely event, the language is to avoid situations like the Vietnam War where servicemembers were sometimes missing for years and their families left in limbo, denied essential benefits.

Here's the updated text:

Seeking support within United Veterans Coalition for Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption

Given that Colorado's United Veterans Coalition requires unanimous agreement on a legislative objective, it seems best to begin asking the various member organizations for a chance to discuss Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. As I understand the process, issues are put forward in June to begin consideration and the agenda is decided upon in November. 

The American Legion has already advanced its resolution asking UVC to consider the Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. Efforts are also underway to discuss the issue with other groups.  UVC has to balance the many concerns it faces, and Gold Star Wives property tax exemption is but one that bears discussion. 

That discussion has already begun with some veterans' organizations and will continue by reaching out to each organization's UVC member representative. Their input is important but the only suggestion thus far is to limit the effort within UVC, respecting its role as the principal voice of Colorado's 460,000 veterans.

It is still unclear about whether a constitutional or legislative solution will be required, but a couple drafts for both approaches are ready for review. Hopefully, the legislature can act and avoid the difficult process of a constitutional amendment. That's a question for the Legislative Council Staff or the Office of Legislative Legal Services but not right now: As with meeting with our legislators, it is necessary to wait until this very busy session wraps up in early June.

 

LEGISLATIVE ACTION: Two possible changes to Article X Section 3.5 to add Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption

Perhaps adding Gold Star Wives to the Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption can be done in a couple different ways. A constitutional amendment is much harder than in earlier years, but legislation or regulatory action might be easier. It bears looking into!

Here are two possible legislative actions, easy-to-use keys we might use by hacking the definition of "disabled veteran" to encompass an active duty death of a soldier, sailor airman or Marine, or a Colorado National Guard member ordered to active state duty:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-3-202, amend 3 (3.5) as follows: 4 39-3-202. Definitions. As used in this part 2, unless the context 5 otherwise requires:

(FIRST possible revision)

(b)  The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection OR THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIED IN THE LINE OF DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHILE ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES

SECOND possible revision)

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, OR AIR FORCE. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIES IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES IS DEEMED A DISABLED VETERAN PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

 

American Legion District 4 Approves Gold Star Resolution for 2022 Action

The Fort Collins Legion post forwarded its unanimously-approved Gold Star Wives resolution to Legion District 4. This morning, the nineteen posts represented unanimously approved the resolution and District 4 now forwards it to Department.. The next step is to convince the department resolution committee and then, it will be put to all delegates. 

Then, the Legion delegate presents the issue to the United Veterans Coalition.

This is very encouraging. The resolution asks the UVC, where both the Legion and the Gold Star Wives are members, to advocate inclusion of survivors of active-duty military line of duty deaths in the Colorado Disabled Veteran Survivor property tax exemption.

We should know more about the Legion's Department of Colorado decision this month!

Opposition to extending the property tax exemption is considerable, with most concern being the tight state budget. Finding $100,000 shouldn't be impossible, given that the general category of homestead exemptions for seniors, disabled military and survivors is $149,000,000; we're asking only for 0.0006 of an increase. 

I realize there is also coordinated opposition by some worried veterans, concerned about the groundwork underway to advance this within UVC. Perhaps there's some area of conflict with other coalition priorities or conflict caused by an outsider (me) trying to get UVC help going forward – nobody has said.

I'm a little concerned about UVC suggestions that any concerns, even these about which I care deeply) are best left altogether to them. I don't want to stand aside to see whether or not the coalition opts to advance GSW. It would seem better strategy, with no conflict of my causing, to advocate among primary members for their support. As I read the 2019 email, the task is getting issues into consideration by June and decided upon for inclusion of GSW with the legislative agenda.

At this point, my objective is still (1) get UVC member organizations aware of the Gold Star Wives property tax exemption (2) get the unanimous UVC member organizations' approval to include this issue in the UVC 2022 state legislative agenda (3) bring this to the attention of interested state legislators to draft a bill and update LCS research from their 2019 review

It has been six years since UVC last considered Gold Star Wives when I asked. Nothing formal ever followed – no bills, no committee hearings. It simply disappeared without action back in 2016. For 2022, We must not meekly stand aside, passively watching and wondering if UVC will act in 2022. 

With the offer of a bill to be introduced in June, and with the hoped-for UVC leadership and support (rather than disappointment with me and undoing my efforts) the issue should have a chance of reaching the legislature, maybe even into law by the summer of 2022.

Farewell, MOAA and my 30-year membership.

No help here!

I've ended my 31-year membership in the Military Officers Association of America, resigning last week. Leadership's brief response to my request for support (copy below) or advice on property tax exemptions for surviving spouses of active-duty military wasn't helpful and didn't deal with the issue. The only answer was that the Colorado MOAA representative would decide whether to support or not, and whether to speak with me or not. 

There wasn't even an offer to bring my concerns about Gold Star Wives and Colorado's TDIU veterans to the MOAA representative.

In essence, I was told by leadership that my effort as a life member to express my need for MOAA help within the United Veterans Coalition was dependent upon and at the sole discretion of our lobbyist. 

MOAA's rep hasn't found an opportunity for me to discuss my hope for MOAA support within the Colorado United Veterans Coalition. My specific request was for MOAA to advocate veterans' issues as per our mission statement. I was sent an email on how the United Veterans Coalition handles legislative objectives but nothing regarding how MOAA could help, nor whether MOAA agreed or disagreed with my concern's solution.

Being denied my voice, permitted any discussion of my needs only upon invitation of another (no matter how kind or skillful or even supportive the lobbyist may be) is unacceptable. This is an MOAA gag. Are officers expected to wait around, mute and dependent on others deciding what's best for us?

Rather than have my affiliation as a member affirm MOAA inaction, disinterest, or perhaps even opposition to my needs, I have terminated my life membership. Now I hope to bring up the issue with other UVC-affiliated groups, seeking their support to place Gold Star Wives and TDIU veterans on its 2022 legislative agenda.

What I wrote MOAA to ask for help:

I'm a life MOAA member and ask your help. Good afternoon. I don't know the complexities of getting an MOAA resolution but hope for your advice. If appropriate, please consider this a motion under the appropriate rules for such a thing.

Our state restricts the small Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption to those whose spouse died while already in receipt of the exemption. This language makes it impossible for "Gold Star Wives: (name change underway to Spouses) to qualify because their troop died on duty and never came home to apply for the exemption An obvious and gruesome "Catch-22." 

There are about 150 or so widows/widowers not already covered under the Homestead Exemption. I'm not addressing Gold Star Wives' second category, spouses of vets who die after the military of service-connected causes because the current language includes them. Legislative Affairs Council estimates the cost to Colorado to be under $100,000.

I'd like to correct this via our membership in the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado. I assume we either agree upon supporting something as an informal process or some sort of resolution. I've drafted such a resolution for discussion.

Please help me correct this discrimination of active duty widows who should be receiving the same respect and honor as do Colorado's disabled veteran survivors.

Several years back, MOAA was much more responsive when I visited headquarters in Washington along with Dr. Jeanie Stellman from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. MOAA and ROA, the American Legion, NPR, even Air Force Times all lent their support throughout the four year effort getting our crews C-123 Agent Orange coverage.

So, thanks again, MOAA, but farewell. I'm not able to travel to Washington again to find somebody in MOAA to hear me out.

May 2015 MOAA Magazine

 

Helpful advice – and a word of caution

For some years I've advocated for Gold Star Wives receiving the same property tax exemption provided survivors of our totally disabled veterans. I've been feeling somewhat better and picked up some steam and got onto the bandwagon (I treasure mixed metaphors) to plow ahead to get some interest among others. 

That hasn't gone so well. Not only is it a difficult sell in a state economy battered by Covid, it is also just one concern among so many affecting veterans and our families. Fortunately, we in Colorado have our United Veterans Coalition to bring to bear 460,000 veterans' voices for legislators to hear,

The UVC does its job well. Their decades-long track record is proof.  The inclusion of a multitude of our largest and smallest veterans' organizations is another proof of the trust placed in UVC by us as veterans. One voice, 460,000 addressing agreed-upon legislative objectives.

But things can still be difficult. I've been concerned about bringing the issue up with the veterans' groups and my elected representatives, hoping for inclusion of Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in the UVC 2022 legislative agenda. That's been hard, with less enthusiasm that I'd expected, and also hard because UVC has its well-established way of doing things. I knew little about UVC objectives and how to get UVC support, but when I asked for updates to information given me in 2019 before starting these current efforts my emails and calls went unanswered. Of course, nobody owes me any response at all - we're all volunteers in these veterans' projects.

You know the phrase: "Lead, follow or get out of the way!" In the vacuum of responses to my inquiries, I found nobody to follow and so I started seeking interest from others. The basic step was clearly getting UVC "primary members" behind what would have to be the unanimous coalition approval. Although I certainly have no attitude about "get out of the way," I didn't grasp the friction that my trodding on others' turf would cause as I reached out to primary coalition members.

So doing what I've been doing hasn't gone too well with UVC and what they're doing. Their opposition to my concerns about Gold Star Wives (I'm a Gold Star Family Member) is perfectly understandable because they are the experienced lobbyists, chosen for their dedication and successes.  GSW wasn't an objective in 2014, 2015, (it was an objective in 2016 as I asked), 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 or 2022. They've mentioned to others that my urging for it to be a 2022 objective wasn't well-received.

I've appreciated their two emails of useful guidance after I directly asked them, " I guess I should just ask outright, should efforts on Gold Star Wives stop altogether? "

Okay. Hand gently patted and pushed away from the throttle. I take it the coalition's suggestion is to "follow the UVC legislative committee updates" to see if action happens to develop among member organizations before coalition approval in November Gold Star Wives' taxation. Also, the gentle inference is that approaching my legislators for interest in their help next year, and approaching groups like the Legion or Colorado National Guard wasn't helpful or welcome, thus the guidance instead of encouragement or advice to do ... anything.

Darn. I'd hoped, expected even, some hand-holding. Some guidance and encouragement. Referring back to their email of sixteen months ago was interesting, and the point was that I should have remembered it and been compliant with it. I guess I was influenced most by our leadership's 16 Nov 2016 instruction:

 "it is crucial that each of you reach out to your own State Senator and  Representative, and at least let him/her know that you are part of the UVC, and talk about how important it is that we support our veterans,

Oh, well.  Lesson learned about playing nice with others.

"...in keeping with our legislative agenda" - United Veterans Coalition Champions Veterans' Issues for Colorado. When the time is right, Gold Star Wives' concerns WILL be heard!

Four hundred and sixty thousand loud, strong voices.  

At the right time,, I'm hopeful these thousands of veterans will be convincing our General Assembly that Gold Star Wives should be eligible for the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption.

But this just isn't the right moment for GSW property tax issues. The benefit will be sought in the near future, just not right now. And it wasn't right back in 2016 when our state legislative agenda included Gold Star survivors but no traction was found, not even a draft bill.

UVC is "the tip of the spear" for our state's veterans. Speaking as one voice, coordinating dozens of organizations state-wide. VFW, DAV, American Legion, PVA, MOAA, NCOA, ROA, AFSA, VVA, and so many others of which I'm not a member – Submarine Veterans, Gold Star Wives - if an association serves vets and their families, if an organization promotes the national defense, they're a welcome part part of UVC and their concerns are heard. The various needs and propositions are discussed by the membership, and those agreed by UVC are delivered to the decision makers, both state and federal, in the form of the annual focused UVC legislative objectives.  

Legislators in Denver and Washington listen carefully, hearing those thousands of UVC voices when the United Veterans Coalition speaks. Whether addressing an individual legislator, senate or house committee, or public forum like a town hall meeting or city council, the United Veterans Coalition commands attention, and rightfully so.

I know this. On a few occasions, I was a witness before the National Academies of Science or one of the house or senate committees, and authorized to speak on behalf of the UVC. UVC was firmly behind me as I sought Agent Orange benefits for C-123 veterans. We got all of Colorado's senators and congressional representatives together to pressure the VA, even to block presidential nominations from consideration until VA acted. Finally, we won on the merit of the issue and UVC strength. 

We won the four year battle and gained VA Agent Orange benefits for 2500 Air Force C-123 aircrew, maintainers and survivors. Until Congress acted on the Blue Water Navy group, this was the only time VA added a new Agent Orange exposure group, and the only expansion of Agent Orange benefits since 1991. With HB16-1444 we won property tax exemptions for Colorado 450 military retirees and their survivors who'd been medically separated from their service as 100% disabled, and in doing so we brought the legislation into agreement with our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5. 

Not only does the UVC present veterans' concerns to our legislator, UVC also prioritizes the multitude of issues and forms an annual legislative agenda for both state and federal issues.

The UVC legislative agenda is already firmly set for 2021, but has yet to be finalized for 2022. Whether or not Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption is identified as an objective is up to the primary members and lobbyists of UVC. The coalition sorts out our needs, identifies the possible, and prioritizes them. Presto, the annual legislative agenda.

At the right time, Gold Star Wives' property tax issue is likely to be addressed by the coalition. Admirably, the GSW members are patient and understanding, with full confidence in the coalition.

The timing for GSW isn't right for 2021. Complexities of state budget, coalition priorities. Strategy and resources – all must align, and then UVC will deliver for the members of Colorado's Gold Star Wives. Let's get together for Gold Star Wives' proper place on the UVC 2022 legislative agenda!

Can a deceased active duty soldier be defined as a "totally disabled veteran" for his/her Colorado survivors' benefits?

Wouldn't that be wonderful! And – maybe – easy also?

Because our state restricts survivor benefits to those whose veterans were already in receipt of the exemption at the time of death, we lock out from all such benefits survivors of troops who die on active duty. Perhaps we can use the existing language of the law. 

Perhaps, only changing the interpretation or definition of the words "totally disabled veteran already in receipt of the exemption" to something like "or active duty death considered to be 'totally disabled and already in receipt of the exemption."

 

SITREP 24 Apr 2021: Stalled??

Stalled? Well, certainly not much interest, although everyone'a so polite. After all, how can anyone not be compassionate towards Gold Star Wives?  What about the argument "Equal taxes for Gold Star Wives?" Does it just fall flat?

Well, too often there's only mild concern about this problem with Colorado's Gold Star Wives' property tax issue. In six years I've had conversations with United Veterans Collation, chiefs of staff in Denver, legislative assistants and others. I've sent out over 500 emails with but two or three responses, including a very nice one recently from Senator Joann Ginal's staff here in Fort Collins. 

Perhaps this will be something our local senator will get behind, for which I'm grateful even for her briefest consideration of the issue. From her colleagues, from other directions, other places. Nothing.

Nothing.

"Not my problem, but perhaps you could talk to your legislator." 

"We can't do anything on survivors' benefits. That's (fill in the blank) responsibility." "Maybe next year."

"We need all possible questions answered before we can possibly discuss this." (BTW, I'm 75 years old, quite ill, sucking oxygen, worried about whether my cancer is gone, homebound and I've only got a few thousand dollars budgeted to throw at the issue. It isn't like I'm able to do this myself: Rather, I pretty much expected responsible public servants and veterans advocates to see a problem when laid out before them and discuss how it can be resolved. Yeah, right. 

Since 2016 when I first brought this to the attention of UVC, there's been ZIP, zero, nada, nothing. I thought the issue of Colorado making Gold Star Wives pay more property taxes than survivors of Colorado's 100% disabled veterans would strike many Coloradans as wrong to the core. Nope.

League of Women Voters, University Women clubs, veterans organizations, DMVA, DOLA, other state agencies – almost universally no response at all. The folks I was to speak with are disappointed to learn that Gold Star Wives whose spouses died on active duty are denied the same partial property tax exemption. granted survivors of totally disabled veterans. They're somewhat taken aback. Saddened, a little. Disbelieving that the state would do that to military widows. Disappointed.

Disappointed, but not pained enough by this gruesome distinction between the two types of military widows that anyone seems to be willing to do anything. Other issues crowd Colorado's United Veterans Coalition state legislative agenda for 2021, just as they have in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. The other issues are important, of course, but so is unjust taxation of active duty widows. 

I'm puzzled: How could UVC have a (very worthy!) goal of property tax relief VA Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) disabled veterans (wonderful – a goal I've also advocated directly and thru the UVC since 2015!) but not Gold Star Wives? Logically, conscious state leaders would balk at tens of thousands of TDIU claimants, but not at under a thousand Gold Star Wives. Logically, both issues are so tied to the same Article X Section 3.5 that they both should have been legislative objectives, either jointly or as separate issues.

I need to remind myself of Ecclesiastes 9:10: “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it." Sounds reasonable...just keep doing it as best we can.

with thy might.”I'm amazed, because this is an issue guaranteed to get a virtually unanimous vote if it could ever reach our legislators. After all, imagine the news photo of the very few politicians who would raise their hands in opposition to legislation permitting Gold Star widows the same property tax exemption granted survivors of totally disabled veterans.

There are so few Gold Star Wives. Especially few are the Gold Star Wives whose spouses died on active duty. The best guess is Colorado has fewer than one thousand men and women survivors of troops lost on active duty. The number pales against the numbers receiving the Homestead Exemption – the total disabled veterans and survivors are only 2% of the general homestead exemption category, and active duty widows/widowers a terribly smaller percentage of that.

Here's the sum of a couple thousand dollars spent trying to get some action and six years of writing, calling, visiting, emailing and glad-handing:
1. A single state senator's staff called me once and emailed me twice, and is still looking at this
2. A Zoom meeting on April 19 2021 to explain what I had on my mind, but "where is the money to come from" and "what legislators are behind this" and "we can't say anything until we see some legislation." So much for my hope of leadership from the Governor or Lieutenant Governor. It isn't that they are supposed to help, but it would help, Help a lot. I expected a genuine "that's terrible, and must be fixed because by God we don't treat war widows that way."
It never came. Instead, "thanks for your input, good bye." If there was help to be offered, or even mild encouragement, not that day. Nor any other day.
3. Two emails came back from folks directing the UVC state legislative effort. They explained GSW was represented in the coalition. It was good learn that CSW could submit the issue for next year's legislative objectives and that is was seemed "reasonable." Indeed. I thought UVC was the best place to turn for action. That's what I thought last month. That's what I thought six years ago.
4. I received an email from a wonderful state Gold Star Wife explaining that their organization is sensitive to Colorado's budget issues during 2020 and 2021, and they don't want to add to the tax burden of their fellow citizens. They are also grateful to the Colorado National Guard and feel survivors of Guard members killed on active state or federal service should be included in any property tax exemption.
They feel next year or 2023 might be a more appropriate time to seek action. I have to admire their patience and self-sacrifice, not only as Gold Star Wives but in the great caution they take to avoid a state budget impact. Willing to let my family have the small property tax exemption that rightfully should have gone to them as the first priority of the government and citizens of Colorado.

Update on Timing, United Veterans Coalition and More:

TIMING IS EVERYTHING

Today I've had some very welcome input from "those in the know" about a Gold Star Wives property tax
exemption efforts, and want to post it here.

First, neither United Veterans Coalition of Colorado nor Gold Star Wives is seeking action on such issues for 2021, and that's ideal because some groundwork is needed this year. There is no possibility of resolution until 2022 and more likely, not until 2023. There are many veterans issues on this year's schedule and it is vital to set priorities.

I'll continue efforts to contact UVC committee chairs about how they'd suggest moving forward. This kind of property tax relief is not on the list of UVC legislative objectives. UVC does have, however, the objective of legislation adding veterans with permanent and total individual "unemployability" (my thoughts) to the benefit. I like legislation rather than constitutional amendment, but certainly feel the priority should rest with action helping survivors as soon as politics and economics permit.

Here's UVC's state legislative objective. Note Item 7, which reads:

7. Support legislation to add ‘Individually Unemployable’ veterans (as defined by U.S.C.Title 38) to the Homestead Act property tax exemption