Seeking support within United Veterans Coalition for Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption

Given that Colorado's United Veterans Coalition requires unanimous agreement on a legislative objective, it seems best to begin asking the various member organizations for a chance to discuss Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. As I understand the process, issues are put forward in June to begin consideration and the agenda is decided upon in November. 

The American Legion has already advanced its resolution asking UVC to consider the Gold Star Wives property tax exemption. Efforts are also underway to discuss the issue with other groups.  UVC has to balance the many concerns it faces, and Gold Star Wives property tax exemption is but one that bears discussion. 

That discussion has already begun with some veterans' organizations and will continue by reaching out to each organization's UVC member representative. Their input is important but the only suggestion thus far is to limit the effort within UVC, respecting its role as the principal voice of Colorado's 460,000 veterans.

It is still unclear about whether a constitutional or legislative solution will be required, but a couple drafts for both approaches are ready for review. Hopefully, the legislature can act and avoid the difficult process of a constitutional amendment. That's a question for the Legislative Council Staff or the Office of Legislative Legal Services but not right now: As with meeting with our legislators, it is necessary to wait until this very busy session wraps up in early June.

 

Farewell, MOAA and my 30-year membership.

No help here!

I've ended my 31-year membership in the Military Officers Association of America, resigning last week. Leadership's brief response to my request for support (copy below) or advice on property tax exemptions for surviving spouses of active-duty military wasn't helpful and didn't deal with the issue. The only answer was that the Colorado MOAA representative would decide whether to support or not, and whether to speak with me or not. 

There wasn't even an offer to bring my concerns about Gold Star Wives and Colorado's TDIU veterans to the MOAA representative.

In essence, I was told by leadership that my effort as a life member to express my need for MOAA help within the United Veterans Coalition was dependent upon and at the sole discretion of our lobbyist. 

MOAA's rep hasn't found an opportunity for me to discuss my hope for MOAA support within the Colorado United Veterans Coalition. My specific request was for MOAA to advocate veterans' issues as per our mission statement. I was sent an email on how the United Veterans Coalition handles legislative objectives but nothing regarding how MOAA could help, nor whether MOAA agreed or disagreed with my concern's solution.

Being denied my voice, permitted any discussion of my needs only upon invitation of another (no matter how kind or skillful or even supportive the lobbyist may be) is unacceptable. This is an MOAA gag. Are officers expected to wait around, mute and dependent on others deciding what's best for us?

Rather than have my affiliation as a member affirm MOAA inaction, disinterest, or perhaps even opposition to my needs, I have terminated my life membership. Now I hope to bring up the issue with other UVC-affiliated groups, seeking their support to place Gold Star Wives and TDIU veterans on its 2022 legislative agenda.

What I wrote MOAA to ask for help:

I'm a life MOAA member and ask your help. Good afternoon. I don't know the complexities of getting an MOAA resolution but hope for your advice. If appropriate, please consider this a motion under the appropriate rules for such a thing.

Our state restricts the small Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption to those whose spouse died while already in receipt of the exemption. This language makes it impossible for "Gold Star Wives: (name change underway to Spouses) to qualify because their troop died on duty and never came home to apply for the exemption An obvious and gruesome "Catch-22." 

There are about 150 or so widows/widowers not already covered under the Homestead Exemption. I'm not addressing Gold Star Wives' second category, spouses of vets who die after the military of service-connected causes because the current language includes them. Legislative Affairs Council estimates the cost to Colorado to be under $100,000.

I'd like to correct this via our membership in the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado. I assume we either agree upon supporting something as an informal process or some sort of resolution. I've drafted such a resolution for discussion.

Please help me correct this discrimination of active duty widows who should be receiving the same respect and honor as do Colorado's disabled veteran survivors.

Several years back, MOAA was much more responsive when I visited headquarters in Washington along with Dr. Jeanie Stellman from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. MOAA and ROA, the American Legion, NPR, even Air Force Times all lent their support throughout the four year effort getting our crews C-123 Agent Orange coverage.

So, thanks again, MOAA, but farewell. I'm not able to travel to Washington again to find somebody in MOAA to hear me out.

May 2015 MOAA Magazine

 

Can a deceased active duty soldier be defined as a "totally disabled veteran" for his/her Colorado survivors' benefits?

Wouldn't that be wonderful! And – maybe – easy also?

Because our state restricts survivor benefits to those whose veterans were already in receipt of the exemption at the time of death, we lock out from all such benefits survivors of troops who die on active duty. Perhaps we can use the existing language of the law. 

Perhaps, only changing the interpretation or definition of the words "totally disabled veteran already in receipt of the exemption" to something like "or active duty death considered to be 'totally disabled and already in receipt of the exemption."

 

Will Politics Play a Role Against Veterans' Needs?

Maybe the question should be – will legislators find a way to use veterans' rights and needs to attack the opposing party? With veterans' issues founded in the Constitution, we think not. Especially not, because we've seen leaders in the Senate and the House, from opposite parties, push for late bills.

Folks in the know about Colorado politics remind us that corrections in our disabled veteran property tax exemption face hurdles, especially if legislation is involved rather than a constitutional challenge at the Supreme Court.

Too often, perfectly worthy bills are assigned to committees which have nothing to do with the bill so that failure is certain. For instance, automobile safety bills assigned by the president of the Senate or the speaker of the House to the Committee on State, Veterans and Military Affairs. That's known as referring bills to a "kill" committee.

So, not only do we have to hope leadership in Denver will obey their oaths of office to support the Constitution and bring statues into accord with it, but we have to hope they don't find in the process a way to attack the opposite party and use "kill" committees. Finally, we have to hope the Legislature views veterans' rights under Article X Section 3.5 to be something they will permit us to finally enjoy by passing essential legislation. Too much to hope for? Perhaps.

The problem is felt heavily by the electorate. Bills might be important problem-fixers, but legislative in-fighting makes it far more important for parties to find ways to hurt each other rather than serve the electorate. The worst of these abuses comes when really important legislation is introduced by one party but blocked by the other only to keep the introducing party from getting credit for good legislation.

Finally, the problem can be that this is the veterans' problem, not our legislators'. Their disinterest might just leave us abandoned.

Solution? Good hearts in CDMVA and the Legislature?

There's hope in Colorado!

Legislative leadership, CDMVA expertise and United Veterans Committee support might craft a solution to the descriptions between the Colorado Constitution's Article X Section 3.5 and the 2007 statute defining "eligible veteran."

If so, more disabled Colorado veterans can be protected by the disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Thanks to all who care about us!

Today - Spoke to the United Veterans Committee

Thanks to kind and skillful editing by Bill Hanna, we circulated a single-page flyer touching on the basics of Colorado's difficulty to generously administer the Constitution's Article X Section 3.5 for disabled veterans property tax exemption.

Further, we even met with two C-123 Ranch Hand veterans plus a VA lady whose husband is one of our post-Vietnam veterans and his Agent Orange claim has sailed through just fine! That unexpected piece of good news is a blessing for my entire week!

We can only hope enough veterans and our advocates raise the question – why isn't the Colorado Constitution faithfully followed in this important area?

Code of Federal Regulations on Unemployability

Following is the Code of Federal Regulations governance of VA unemployability ratings. Note that VA considers Permanent and Total Unemployability awards (TDIU) to be "a rating of 100 percent service-connected disability based on individual unemployability"

§3.340   Total and permanent total ratings and unemployability.

(a) Total disability ratings—(1) General. Total disability will be considered to exist when there is present any impairment of mind or body which is sufficient to render it impossible for the average person to follow a substantially gainful occupation. Total disability may or may not be permanent. Total ratings will not be assigned, generally, for temporary exacerbations or acute infectious diseases except where specifically prescribed by the schedule.

(2) Schedule for rating disabilities. Total ratings are authorized for any disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities prescribes a 100 percent evaluation or, with less disability, where the requirements of paragraph 16, page 5 of the rating schedule are present or where, in pension cases, the requirements of paragraph 17, page 5 of the schedule are met.

(3) Ratings of total disability on history. In the case of disabilities which have undergone some recent improvement, a rating of total disability may be made, provided:

(i) That the disability must in the past have been of sufficient severity to warrant a total disability rating;

(ii) That it must have required extended, continuous, or intermittent hospitalization, or have produced total industrial incapacity for at least 1 year, or be subject to recurring, severe, frequent, or prolonged exacerbations; and

(iii) That it must be the opinion of the rating agency that despite the recent improvement of the physical condition, the veteran will be unable to effect an adjustment into a substantially gainful occupation. Due consideration will be given to the frequency and duration of totally incapacitating exacerbations since incurrence of the original disease or injury, and to periods of hospitalization for treatment in determining whether the average person could have reestablished himself or herself in a substantially gainful occupation.

(b) Permanent total disability. Permanence of total disability will be taken to exist when such impairment is reasonably certain to continue throughout the life of the disabled person. The permanent loss or loss of use of both hands, or of both feet, or of one hand and one foot, or of the sight of both eyes, or becoming permanently helpless or bedridden constitutes permanent total disability. Diseases and injuries of long standing which are actually totally incapacitating will be regarded as permanently and totally disabling when the probability of permanent improvement under treatment is remote. Permanent total disability ratings may not be granted as a result of any incapacity from acute infectious disease, accident, or injury, unless there is present one of the recognized combinations or permanent loss of use of extremities or sight, or the person is in the strict sense permanently helpless or bedridden, or when it is reasonably certain that a subsidence of the acute or temporary symptoms will be followed by irreducible totality of disability by way of residuals. The age of the disabled person may be considered in determining permanence.

(c) Insurance ratings. A rating of permanent and total disability for insurance purposes will have no effect on ratings for compensation or pension.

[26 FR 1585, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981]

§3.341   Total disability ratings for compensation purposes.

(a) General. Subject to the limitation in paragraph (b) of this section, total-disability compensation ratings may be assigned under the provisions of §3.340. However, if the total rating is based on a disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities provides an evaluation of less than 100 percent, it must be determined that the service-connected disabilities are sufficient to produce unemployability without regard to advancing age.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)

(b) Incarcerated veterans. A total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability which would first become effective while a veteran is incarcerated in a Federal, State or local penal institution for conviction of a felony, shall not be assigned during such period of incarceration. However, where a rating for individual unemployability exists prior to incarceration for a felony and routine review is required, the case will be reconsidered to determine if continued eligibility for such rating exists.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5313(c))

(c) Program for vocational rehabilitation. Each time a veteran is rated totally disabled on the basis of individual unemployability during the period beginning after January 31, 1985, the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service will be notified so that an evaluation may be offered to determine whether the achievement of a vocational goal by the veteran is reasonably feasible.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163)

[46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 52774, Dec. 26, 1985; 55 FR 17271, Apr. 24, 1990l; 58 FR 32445, June 10, 1993; 68 FR 34542, June 10, 2003]

Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs Stumbles on Property Tax Exemption for Disabled Vets & Widows

Colorado statue on disabled veteran property tax relief: §§ 39-3-202(2) and (3) and 203(1.5) to (5), C.R.S:

"rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force."

Issues.

(1) Required to follow the 2007 legislation, Colorado Department of Veterans Affairs excludes recognition of US military disability retirements, despite provision in the constitution and blocks such veterans from the disabled veteran property tax exemption.

(2) Missing from the Constitution but added somehow by CODVA as their own disqualifier are veterans with “unemployability” VA ratings. US Department of Veterans Affairs ratings for permanent and total disability with unemployability (TDIU) are unacceptable to CODVA, blocking many qualified veterans, and their survivors, from any disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Generally, veterans who receive 100% VA disability compensation pension benefits are free to work and are not limited in the amount of earnings they may receive, even when their single- or combined-impairment ratings total 100%. For example, office or sedentary workers such as clerks, lawyers, telephone workers and others may be totally disabled from military line of duty illness or injury yet fully able to continue gainful and satisfying employment although rated 100% disabled by VA for loss of use of legs.

Not so a TDIU disabled vet, professionally judged by VA, Social Security or state rehabilitation agency. That veteran’s service-connected disabilities are sufficient, without regard to other factors, and so severe as to prevent performing the mental and/or physical tasks required to get or keep substantially gainful employment. TDIU recognizes only permanent and totally disabling service-connected issues via an extra-schedular construct. A TDIU veteran is even barred by VA from employment rehab services because no employment is deemed possible.

Permanent and total disability individual unemployability (TDIU) is a recognition that service connected disabilities, while not rated individually at 100%, are complete enough in their totality to equal 100% and to prohibit employment and are in total, permanent and completely disabling. Diseases and injuries of long standing that are actually totally incapacitating will be regarded as permanently and totally disabling when the probability of permanent improvement under treatment is remote.

Permanence of total disability is taken to exist when such impairment is reasonably certain to continue throughout the life of the disabled person. Total disability is considered to exist when there is present any impairment of mind or body that is sufficient to render it impossible for the average person to follow a substantially gainful occupation.

Generally, a vet qualifying for TDIU would also meet SSI requirements for disability benefits, but the same is not true regarding SSDI recipients and TDIU because TDIU is awarded only for military line of duty issues that cause complete and permanent disability. The military services infrequently award such total disability retirements for service members whose injuries or illnesses are completely disabling and considered to be unimproved for life, but all military disability ratings, even for combat, are not accepted by CODVA which recognizes only the US Department of Veterans Affairs decisions, but then, not including VA’s permanent and total service-connected unemployability disability awards. The means by which CODVA excludes military disability retirements is not known, even though its provision is clearly constitutional and blocking these veterans is clearly unconstitutional!

Generally speaking, disregard for military disability ratings and VA TDIU ratings seems unique among states providing property tax relief. For instance, Virginia’s statutes:

A veteran is considered to have a 100 percent service-connected disability if:
• The veteran's disability is rated at 100%; or
• The veteran's service-connection is rated at less than 100%, but the veteran is paid at the 100% disability rate due to unemployability.

NOTE: Under either standard, the disability must be considered total and permanent. Veterans with temporary disabilities do not qualify.

Some Legislative History of the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

The problem: Colorado's voters defined "qualified disabled veteran via a Constitutional amendment (Referendum E). Presently the Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs unfairly excludes from the benefit qualified veterans with permanent "unemployability" VA awards, and also excludes veterans directly retired by the military services per permanent and total disability.

Military disability retired property tax relief for Colorado's totally disabled military veterans is based on the 2006 amendment to the state Constitution. The wording of the title of Referendum E is inclusive of any "United States Military veteran who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability." 

Nowhere in the Constitution nor other legislation does the "unemployability"appear. It was added as an exemption only by extra-legal preference of the CDMVA, contrary to the Constitution.

Here is the full title, approved by the voters:

AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY Here's the text of Referendum E's definition of "disabled veteran:"

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL yGUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, OR HOMELAND SECURITY. 

(note: There is a minor conflict between the referendum's pension language and its requirement that disabilities be service-connected – the VA pension program is based on low-income and need, not service-connected disabilities. There is no such thing as 100% service-connected disability pensions.)

The 2007 Legislature "fine tuned" Section 3.5 of Article X from the 2006 Constitutional amendment. It bypassed the voter-approved "any veteran," dropped the pension, but  very improperly redefined and restricted the definition of "qualifying veteran" by failure to adhere to the broad and inclusive language of the voter-approved referendum.

"(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department. "

The 2007 Legislature errored in its modification of the definition of "qualifying veteran" away from that approved by the electorate and per the Constitution. This amounted to an ex post facto law depriving many formerly qualified disabled veterans from the Constitution's protection regarding property tax. Further, this violates the US Constitution by depriving the affected veterans of their property (the tax benefit) without due process. From the Colorado Constitution's Bill of Rights:

"Section 11. Ex post facto laws. No ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."

The "Unemployability" TDIU estriction on Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, Overturning Voters' Constitutional Amendment

Wording on Colorado counties' disabled veteran property tax exemption forms:

The 2007 enabling legislation forces CMDVA to a somewhat restricted eligibility compared to the broader constitution's provisions::

"An individual who sustained a service-connected disability that has been rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as 100% “permanent and total.” VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."

Readers will please note that the word "unemployability" appears only on county forms and various state brochures describing the disabled veteran property tax program: nowhere does that exclusion exist in the law! It was simply added by CDMVA acting on legislative input.