SITREP 18 May 2021: Report to Colorado Gold Star Wives re: Property Tax Exemption

(an update)

Good evening. I trust  you've had a pleasant weekend.

I should run a couple items past you. There will probably be some confusion about whether an act of the legislature or a constitutional amendment will be necessary for Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in 2022.

UVC practice is to have a member organization (in this case, GSW) submit proposed state legislative objectives in June for a hoped-for unanimous vote by the coalition; putting it to the UVC or not remains strictly your call, of course.

I've prepared a draft bill and a draft amendment.. They are terribly amateurish and too long, but hopefully get my point across. Read, don't read, revise, dump'em as you wish. They shouldn't be submitted if in conflict with your objectives or other UVC agenda items.

As you asked, provisions are made for the Colorado National Guard survivors as well as spouses of military missing in action. The situation during Vietnam had many families in limbo, confused between survivor and active duty benefits for years. This isn't a situation likely to happen but...just in case.

Last, I redefined "veteran" to include those lost on active duty or missing in action.

The choice between amendment or legislation will be made by whichever house initiates action, and by Legislative Council Staff or by the Office of Legislative Legal Services. Fortunately, LCS did an analysis for Rep. Kipp back in 2019 that might help should you and UVC proceed. 

For a member's suggestion of a legislative objective, UVC also requires a statement as to how the proposition helps veterans, and for both it is "Improve survivor benefits, promote stable home ownership, support the Colorado National Guard."

I copied you earlier on the American Legion resolution asking UVC to support GSW property tax exemption. It goes before the state Legion in late June. Nineteen posts have already given their unanimous support. Again, all efforts were directed only towards asking UVC to make it an objective for 2o22, and of course they can disregard if they wish.

There are a couple representatives and senators who are interested in GSW, and available for discussion once this session wraps up. I've never heard from David Ortiz but perhaps someone who knows him can reach out in June.

I've tried to follow the suggestions from your UVC lobbyists as well as input by the Guard, former UVC leaders, my own Gold Star Family members and some survivors from my own church here in Fort Collins. I'll leave the issue now for you to do whatever the Colorado Gold Star Wives chapters decide. God bless you all.

My very best regards,

        Wes Carter

DRAFT 2022 BILL EXTENDING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION TO "Gold Star Spouses," SURVIVORS OF ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY

This is just an untutored amateur's rough draft following the legislation guide  of a bill that might work to qualify Gold Star Wives for the property tax exemption by legislation instead of a constitutional amendment. Otherwise, an amendment would take a super-majority of the legislature to recommend to the voters.

            

                                                  A BILL FOR AN ACT

CONCERNING THE DISABLED VETERAN SURVIVOR PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ESTABLISH QUALIFICATION OF A SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES, BY EXTENDING THE DEFINITION OF “OWNER-OCCUPIER PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION”

________________________________________________________                                                                

                                                               Bill Summary

(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

Colorado provides the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption to a survivor of a totally disabled veteran “previously qualified for a property tax exemption,” per § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), Colorado Revised Statutes. The requirement that the veteran be in receipt of the exemption at the time of death necessarily denies the exemption to the survivor of an active-duty servicemember whose death was in the line of duty. Survivors of Colorado National Guard servicemembers whose death was in the line of duty while activated for state contingencies are also denied the exemption. This is contrary to the clear intent of the 2006 Referendum E in which voters approved the exemption to “one hundred percent permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability,” a line of duty death also being, in effect, a total and permanent disability.

This bill extends the definition of “owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption” to include servicemembers whose death was in the line of duty while in the Armed Forces of the United States or in the Colorado National Guard while activated for state contingencies, thereby qualifying those surviving spouses for the same property tax exemption as the surviving spouse of a previously qualified disabled veteran.

_________________________________________________________

 

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-3-203, amend (11) as follows:

The owner-occupier is the surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under subparagraph (I) of this paragraph, ONLY FOR PURPOSES OF § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, THE SURVIVING SPOUSE WHO HAS NOT REMARRIED OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCY;” and

(b) The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205 and the circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application.  Under no circumstances shall an exemption be allowed for property taxes assessed during any property tax year prior to the year in which an owner-occupier first files an exemption application.

(1.5)(a) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is a qualifying disabled veteran shall be exempt from taxation if:

(I) The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205 ;  and

(II) The circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application.

(a.5) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2015, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is the surviving spouse of a qualifying disabled veteran who previously received an exemption under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5)  OR SURVIVING SPOUSE WHO HAS NOT REMARRIED OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCY, is exempt from taxation. 

SECTION 2.. In Colorado Revised Statutes Title 8. Labor and Industry § 8-14.3-202. Definitions, amend (8) as follows:

“Veteran” means a person who actively served in the United States armed forces and WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY or who was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable, in accordance with U.S.C. title 38, as amended.  “Veteran” includes a person serving or who served in the National Guard or as a reservist

BREAK - --WHAT ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS ARE NEEDED HERE?--BREAK

SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 5, 2022, if adjournment sine die is on May 6, 2022)

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

INFO:

EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE  APPLICATION:

1. MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OR EVIDENCE OF CIVIL UNION

2. DEATH CERTIFICATE, OR VA OR DOD STATEMENT 

3. EVIDENCE OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BY SERVICEMEMBER OR SPOUSE

4. COMPLETED APPLICATION

NOTE: survivors of active duty servicemembers separated for total disability or rated by VA as 100 per cent permanently and totally disabled and who then die are already eligible for the exemption.

Gold Star Wives' Property Tax Exemption: Our goal is UVC support for enactment in 2022!

 

LEGISLATIVE ACTION: Two possible changes to Article X Section 3.5 to add Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption

Perhaps adding Gold Star Wives to the Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption can be done in a couple different ways. A constitutional amendment is much harder than in earlier years, but legislation or regulatory action might be easier. It bears looking into!

Here are two possible legislative actions, easy-to-use keys we might use by hacking the definition of "disabled veteran" to encompass an active duty death of a soldier, sailor airman or Marine, or a Colorado National Guard member ordered to active state duty:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-3-202, amend 3 (3.5) as follows: 4 39-3-202. Definitions. As used in this part 2, unless the context 5 otherwise requires:

(FIRST possible revision)

(b)  The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection OR THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIED IN THE LINE OF DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHILE ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES

SECOND possible revision)

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, OR AIR FORCE. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DIES IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OR THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES IS DEEMED A DISABLED VETERAN PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

 

Sample Association resolution: "Extend Disabled Veterans' Survivor Property Tax Exemption to Gold Star Spouses"

 Here's what has been proposed to the American Legion, although in no way approved yet It needs post approval, then district, before the Department of Colorado can decide on it. Again. only a draft. (May 5: modified to forward the resolution only to UVC for them to consider.)

=====================================

Colorado's Curious Management of its Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, & the "Unemployability" Disqualification (updated May 12, 2021)

Five years ago I wrote about the curious sleight of hand employed to sell the voters on a worthy Colorado constitutional amendment but then the enabling legislation delivered a greatly watered-down statute. 

I backed off the subject after the United Veterans Committee (now United Veterans Coalition) made clear its nonsupport at that time. Understandably, it was best to avoid conflict and not mess up the carefully-crafted UVC legislative agenda. Happily, I understand that UVC has a related bill to increase the exemption as one of the 2021 objectives. Unhappily, I feel its cost of over $19M leaves no chance of success and UVC and the bill's sponsor might instead have pushed for Gold Star Wives and/or TDIU disabled veterans.

I refer here to Referendum E from back in 2006. Our legislature generously proposed a constitutional amendment (Article X Section 3.5) to provide a small partial property tax exemption to totally disabled veterans. Note the wording: "totally disabled veterans." Let's follow that bouncing ball of how definitions of  "totally disabled veterans" kept a-changing – and to finally covered as few vets as possible:

Here is the full text of Referendum E to amend the state constitution:

"AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY.”

This is important: Note the "one hundred percent permanently disabled" and the separate phrase, "due to a service-connected disability." Here in Colorado those words are now interpreted to be one kind of totally disabled veteran but could be read to refer to two kinds. That's right. VA has two different types of totally and permanently disabled veterans. "TDIU" for total disability for individual unemployability" and 100% service connected disabled for vets with a disability, or group of disabilities when added together, equalling 100%. 

Here is how the Legislative Council told us via the Blue Book what we were voting for:

"Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong."

An overwhelming 85% of Colorado voters approved this worthy benefit for those who served our state and nation. But then the lawmakers themselves got involved and took a fire hose to the benefit, watering it down quite a bit.

When Denver finally enacted legislation for the mechanics of Article X section 3.5 to work, Referendum E ended up much less broad than what we approved. The number of qualified recipients of the benefit was cut by more than half to protect budget resources for other projects.

Here is the actual text that finally delivered Referendum E to us as law:

"(3.5) “Qualifying disabled veteran” means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department."

And next, here is the Colorado Department of Military and Veterans Affairs form for applicants, where there are two portions describing "totally disabled veterans."

"A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements
- § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S . A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements - § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S.• The veteran sustained a service-connected disability while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States. This includes members of the National Guard and Reserves who sustained their injury during a period in which they were called to active duty. • The veteran was honorably discharged.• The federal Department of Veterans Affairs has rated the veteran’s service-connected disability as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department"

– and from the back page – 

"2. DISABLED VETERAN STATUS: To qualify, both questions must be true and you must attach a copy of your VA award letter verifying that you have been given a permanent disability rating by the VA." 

CDMVA web site:

"The Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption is available to applicants who sustained a service-connected disability rated by the Federal Department of Veterans Affairs as a 100 percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the Department, the United States Department of Homeland Security, or the Department of the Army, Navy or Air Force. VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility." 

So, after all this reading, do you see where the disabled veteran property tax exemption got watered down by more than half? It was through the disqualification of veterans rated totally and permanently disabled by VA for "unemployability." Tossed into the program are the words, "VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."  Note that these TDIU people aren't veterans who are out of work, but instead vets who've been evaluated as being physically unable to ever work. And are monitored to make sure that remains the case.

Side note: the constitution included as eligible veterans those who were medically retired by their service as 100% disabled. The fourteen words describing these vets were left out of the law until 2016, when HB16-1444 brought the tax legislation into accord with the constitution.

(Here is an analysis I prepared in 2016 when I last worked on disabled veteran unemployability tax exemption issues.)

VA "unemployability" is its 100% disability rating for vets with at least one 60% service-connected issue and whose overall disabilities are so severe, so far beyond the scope for which VA assigned the 60%, that any meaningful employment is impossible. VA has other rating of "catastrophically disabled" but even when a vet is rated both unemployable and catastrophically disabled, that doesn't meet CDMVA's redefinition of Referendum E also is awarded to vets with at least a 60% service-connected disability:

"Veterans are considered to be Catastrophically Disabled when they have a severely disabling injury, disorder or disease that permanently compromises their ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The disability must be of such a degree that the Veteran requires personal or mechanical assistance to leave home or bed, or require constant supervision to avoid physical harm to themselves or others."

 Let's note that VA has two kinds of unemployability awards. The first is temporary or "IU," meant for periods of uncertainty about recovery or rehabilitation after surgery or illness, and the second is permanent (TDIU) for exactly that – permanent disability for life. TDIU veterans not only are medically determined to be unable to work, they are also carefully evaluated for that situation by the Veterans Benefit Administration before given the rating. Finally, they are carefully monitored by VA to check that they remain unable to work and both Social Security and IRS records are checked. 

Because Colorado references the VA totally disabled rating everywhere, we should look at how VA itself describes a totally disabled veteran. Read carefully and compare to Colorado's absolute disqualification of TDIU vets from the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. Here is the VA Office of Inspector General's very appropriate definition:

"Veterans are considered to have total disability when they have a 100 percent disability rating due to service-connected disabilities or if their service-connected disabilities make them unemployable. For the total disability to be permanent, the law requires the disability to be “based upon an impairment reasonably certain to continue throughout life."

"The Veterans Benefits Administration Inadequately Supported Permanent and Total Disability Decisions",

    VA OIG 19-00227-226, Page ii, September 10, 2020

Clearly,  veterans with total disability, including TDIU, is what voters thought they were approving by votes for Referendum E back in 2006. So where did the Colorado prohibition of unemployability for the benefit come from?

I asked CDMVA and they said ask DOLA. I asked DOLA and in 2014 was told "some legislators" wanted that limitation. Legislators. Not the voters. Legislators introduced (snuck in!)  their own idea of
disqualification into what voters more broadly approved as our constitutional amendment.

My view: Veterans with a 100% disability rating, including TDIU, were provided the small tax exemption via Referendum E when we voted approval. TDIU eligibility should be corrected by legislative action. I do not favor broadening the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption below the 100% disability level as the impact would be far too burdensome on taxpayers. 

Further, veterans often have disabilities common among folks their own age group, such as COPD, diabetes, hypertension and hearing loss. It would be unfair to a taxpayer with COPD to pay full property taxes while the veteran neighbor with a 50% COPD disability rating doesn't. The obvious need for tax relief is for survivors and the totally disabled veteran! Full stop.

Conclusion: A few legislators hijacked Referendum E and Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution, doing decades of harm to a large number of otherwise qualified Colorado totally disabled veterans and their survivors.

Time to set this right! What say you – Is 2022 too soon?

Mission Statement & Initial Plans for Gold Star Wives 2022 Property Tax Initiative

CLICK to download this 5-page outline of this goal for Gold Star Wives to get the same property tax relief as do survivors of disabled veterans.

Scan our QR code for the Gold Star Wives briefing packet