Showing posts with label unemployability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unemployability. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

What needs to be fixed to comply with Colorado's Constitution Article X Section 3.5?

CLICK FOR BRIEFING PACKAGE
Easy. Everyone swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and we can count on our public servants to correct legislation offensive to the Constitution. Their oaths, plus the clear knowledge that inaction by the Legislature fails Colorado's disabled veterans by denying us our Constitution's protection, make the Legislature's duty obvious.

Easy because it is so very clear. Current defective statutes addressing Article X Section 3.5 so clearly offend the Constitution we can easily summarize what's needed.

Corrective Action:
1. Military service total disability retirements must have enabling statute
2. All barriers to VA's total disability individual unemployability (TDIU) permanent ratings must be removed, but do not need corrective legislation. Regulatory correction suffices because each element of TDIU already satisfies constitutional requirement NOTE: RECOMMENDED: correct the defect in the entire program's failure to accommodate widows of service members who die on active duty, without a chance to qualify for veteran's status 
Justification:
1. Military service total disability retirements are clearly specified in Article X Section 3.5 and must be made acceptable to CDMA
2. The electorate exercised its power to amend the Constitution and approved Referendum E. Voter guidance from Colorado Legislative Council described unemployable disabled veterans, and each specific in Article X Section 3.5 as well as subsequent legislation detailed "permanent, service-connected, 100% total" as qualifying elements. The US Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Benefits Administration confirmed each element is also an element of the VA permanent TDIU disability rating, and VA has offered to brief CDMA and other Colorado agencies.

DISCOVERED – A 2010 DOLA Reference to "Unemployability"

DOLA brochure           
Days and days have been spent trying to pin down how the state's basis for its current barrier to VA permanent and total disabled unemployability (TDIU) ratings and just how it grew into policy. Perhaps one such source document was found this evening, published in 2010 by the Department of Legislative Analysis (DOLA.) But nothing so far any earlier than 2010.

We learned that the 2006 Referendum E voter summary specifically described unemployability issues for the electorate to approve in this constitutional amendment. ("Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong.") That's what the voters were asked to consider. They approved, but the Legislature dropped from statutes along with military 100% disability retirements. Ge3.5t the point? The Legislature in effect changed the Constitution by statues which failed to encompass the full range of Article X Section, leaving CMDVA unable to follow the Constitution's provisions and stuck with the flawed statute instead.

Article X Section 3.5 simply mentioned "permanent, 100% service connected, total disability" VA ratings with nothing at all to eliminate or somehow disqualify TDIU. We learned that CDMVA said the department had "legislative guidance" to exclude VA TDIU, despite the Constitution and the subsequent enabling legislation passed in 2007. In the 2006 ballot information, voters were told Referendum E was to address vets who were "100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job." The voters did not vote to bar unemployability ratings but specifically to include that rating for property tax exemption.

Did the legislators decide to override the electorate after Article X Section 3.5 was added to the Constitution? Why did CMDVA end up with its rules being 180º away from what voters approved? How did the Constitution's provision for CDMVA to recognize military service total disability retirements disappear from subsequent statute ?

Exemption application forms, county web pages and various unofficial sources mention that VA unemployability awards were unacceptable to CMDVA, but nothing on a state form. CallinguCMDVA yields the same negative answer - "not acceptable." We found nothing else from the State Until this evening, discovered on the Colorado Legislative Council web page.

Tonight, the earliest info we've been able to dig up is a 2010 DOLA-published two-page flyer titled "PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR DISABLED VETERANS IN COLORADO." Now, there's nothing official about this and it is an information-only type document, and it came out four years after the Constitution's change.

DOLA wrote, "VA employability awards do not meet the eligibility requirements." This 2010 brochure is the earliest document we can find addressing unemployability, and the only state document. We've found nothing more official on which CMDVA policy was based.

Monday, March 14, 2016

Will Politics Play a Role Against Veterans' Needs?

Maybe the question should be – will legislators find a way to use veterans' rights and needs to attack the opposing party? With veterans' issues founded in the Constitution, we think not. Especially not, because we've seen leaders in the Senate and the House, from opposite parties, push for late bills.

Folks in the know about Colorado politics remind us that corrections in our disabled veteran property tax exemption face hurdles, especially if legislation is involved rather than a constitutional challenge at the Supreme Court.

Too often, perfectly worthy bills are assigned to committees which have nothing to do with the bill so that failure is certain. For instance, automobile safety bills assigned by the president of the Senate or the speaker of the House to the Committee on State, Veterans and Military Affairs. That's known as referring bills to a "kill" committee.

So, not only do we have to hope leadership in Denver will obey their oaths of office to support the Constitution and bring statues into accord with it, but we have to hope they don't find in the process a way to attack the opposite party and use "kill" committees. Finally, we have to hope the Legislature views veterans' rights under Article X Section 3.5 to be something they will permit us to finally enjoy by passing essential legislation. Too much to hope for? Perhaps.

The problem is felt heavily by the electorate. Bills might be important problem-fixers, but legislative in-fighting makes it far more important for parties to find ways to hurt each other rather than serve the electorate. The worst of these abuses comes when really important legislation is introduced by one party but blocked by the other only to keep the introducing party from getting credit for good legislation.

Finally, the problem can be that this is the veterans' problem, not our legislators'. Their disinterest might just leave us abandoned.

Sunday, March 13, 2016

Colorado's Legislative Council – did they let veterans down on Referendum E?

I'm learning so much as I follow the trail of Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption, the 2006 Referendum E.

What I've learned about is Colorado's legislative process. Reading about it I've got a better picture about the history of our disabled vet property tax exemption and problems now surfacing.

The steps begin with the Legislature sending the language of a referendum to the Legislative Council to insure its legality, compliance with style and format. That means the property tax exemption was carefully worded by the Legislative Council for the specific words by which the Constitution would be amended, and also the words by which the electorate would be guided to an understanding of the referendum adequate to have an informed opinion when voting.

You can see what they did below in the referendum's plain-language description. Attention is drawn to the highlighted words in the "who qualifies for the tax deduction" section. Consider...this was written by the Legislature's "experts"??
"Who qualifies for the tax reduction? Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability qualify for the tax reduction in Referendum E. Colorado National Guard members injured while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces also qualify. Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong. Nationally, less than one percent of veterans have a 100-percent permanent disability rating. About 2,200 veterans are expected to qualify for the property tax reduction in Colorado."
After the voters approved Referendum E by 78% and by it, created Article X Section 3.5 of the Colorado Constitution, it became the job of the Legislature to craft enabling legislation. Once done, that headed over to the Colorado Legislative Council for the same reasons...legal clarity, compliance with the Constitution, form and style. This is where serious problems popped up. Legislation did not match the newly-amended Constitution! The electorate was duped.

What the Legislative Council approved for the Referendum E'/Article X Section 3.5 enabling statute drifted far from what the electorate were told they'd voted for. Struck from the statute was a very important group of veterans the state now cites statute to deny the exemption, even though this category of disabled vet is spelled out in tht Cinstitution. Vets whose injuries leave them unable to work are termed "permanent and total service connected unemployability" ratings. That's bad because the Legislative Council blocked about half of the veterans the electorate voted to help! From the 2006 Blue Book:
"Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong."
Disabled veterans with VA's unemployability disability rating were specified as what the voters were helping, became in the administration of the statute by CMDVA a group specified as unqualified.

That's a complete 180º shift away from the Constitution, enough to disappoint this veteran! 

What is the value of Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption?

Very simply, a totally disabled veteran's property is given a $100,000 exemption from the appraised value. A veteran's widow(er) also receives the exemption if the veteran was receiving the exemption before death. Sadly, no combat deaths qualify because the servicemember wasn't receiving the benefit at death, obviously.

Referendum E was explained to voters as an effort to thank Colorado's veterans whose service left them 100% permanently and totally disabled, about one percent of all veterans.

Vets still pay property tax but that burden is lessened on average about $466. Total cost to the state was estimated at $1,000,000 for extending the benefit to an estimated 2000 veterans.

There is also a benefit to the entire state in encouraging and supporting voluntary military service.
Referendum E, which became Article X Section 3.5 of our state constitution, is Colorado's largest benefit for qualified disabled veterans, although not to be compared to other states like New Hampshire or New Jersey where all property taxes are excused. The public expressed the intent of a little tax help so that totally disabled veterans might get and keep their homes, although the benefit applies only to homeowners.

Other states provide different property tax relief. Oregon, for instance, exempts only $18,000 of the assessed value. Connecticut and a few other states offer 100% tax exemption. Colorado wrongly considers itself "somewhat above average" in disabled veterans' benefits.

Remember: disabled veterans and military retirees are combat- proven good citizens and also economically beneficial to their states. Their pensions and retirements are huge injections of cash to local economies. Because of federal benefits, they are not burdens, and many states actively target these folks as new residents by offering such things as property and income tax relief. 

Colorado can do so much more, especially with free state park camping, tax-exempt military retirement, and more significant property tax exemptions.



Friday, March 11, 2016

Solution? Good hearts in CDMVA and the Legislature?

There's hope in Colorado!

Legislative leadership, CDMVA expertise and United Veterans Committee support might craft a solution to the descriptions between the Colorado Constitution's Article X Section 3.5 and the 2007 statute defining "eligible veteran."

If so, more disabled Colorado veterans can be protected by the disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Thanks to all who care about us!

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Finally – A comprehensive (though disappointing) answer about the conflict between Colorado's constitution and statutes on disabled vet property tax exemption

I asked...and she answered very completely. Now I have something to work with going forward.

From: Groff - DOLA, JoAnn <j>
Dear Mr. Carter: 

Renee Bridges and Stan Gueldenzopf on the staff here at the Division of Property Taxation, Department of Local Affairs have both contacted me about your concerns. To clarify, I understand your issue is that you have a different opinion of the wording of the Colorado Constitution from how it is interpreted by Colorado Statute and subsequently applied by the Division of Veterans Affairs in the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs. Renee Bridges suggested that you contact your legislators, but perhaps didn't offer enough explanation as to the "why" you should contact them. I hope to add some clarity here.

When there is a question regarding an interpretation of the constitutionality of statute there are two governing authorities. The first is the Colorado General Assembly. The presumption is that their interpretation through law IS constitutional. Subsequently, the Administrative staff who interprets and then enforces the statutes (read Division of Veterans Affairs, Division of Property Taxation and our respective Departments) does not have the authority to question whether the law is in conflict with the Constitution, we must assume all statutes are constitutional. If there is a question of whether a statute is constitutional, the second governing authority is the Colorado Supreme Court. If the Court says it is NOT constitutional then that part of the law becomes null and void and the General Assembly starts over. 

Short of bringing a lawsuit, individual legislators do have the ability to ask Legislative Legal Services, the office that acts as the attorneys for the General Assembly, for a legal interpretation of whether a part of the statute is constitutional. The legislators also can introduce legislation, even without an opinion of their lawyers, if the legislator feels the current statutory interpretation is incorrect, OR if they feel the language of the constitution might support a more broad interpretation than that which is currently in statute. 

For your circumstances, rather than initiating a costly and protracted legal review through the courts, my staff thought the best place to start is to see if your individual legislators agree with your argument and feel a change in the statute is appropriate. The interpretation you propose cannot be enacted independently by the administrative departments responsible for the program. I hope this offers clarity to our earlier response. 

All the best. JoAnn

JoAnn Groff 
Property Tax Administrator

303-864-7776  I  M 303-864-7777  F 303-864-7799
1313 Sherman St., Suite 419, Denver, CO 80203 

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Our Colorado Constitution – Why isn't it followed?

They all swore to uphold it.

The Colorado Constitution specifies in Article X Section 3.5 that total disability military service retirements qualify veterans for the state's disabled veteran property tax exemption. Colorado's Department of Military and Veterans Affairs has a policy against that ever since the Constitution was amended by Referendum E in 2006 and denies the benefit of the exemption to qualified disabled veterans.

Article XII Section 8.  Oath of civil officers. Every civil officer, except members of the general assembly and such inferior officers as may be by law exempted, shall, before he enters upon the duties of his office, take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to support the constitution of the United States and of the state of Colorado, and to faithfully perform the duties of the office upon which he shall be about to enter. 
Article X Section 3.5 (ignored part in red, abused part in blue)(1.5) For purposes of this section, "disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force. 
Not only have the last fifteen words in the Constitution's definition of eligible veteran been dropped in the 2007 statute, CMDVA imperfectly follows the requirement to extend the exemption to vets "rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability benefits...pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department.

This partial state failure is their denial of claims from veterans holding VA's 100% permanent and total service connected disability for unemployment rating. The Constitution and subsequent legislation make no mention of "unemployability" ratings being barred.


Thus, one of two VA total service-connected disability ratings is abused, even though it complies word-for-word with the Colorado Constitution.


Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Today - Spoke to the United Veterans Committee

Thanks to kind and skillful editing by Bill Hanna, we circulated a single-page flyer touching on the basics of Colorado's difficulty to generously administer the Constitution's Article X Section 3.5 for disabled veterans property tax exemption.

Further, we even met with two C-123 Ranch Hand veterans plus a VA lady whose husband is one of our post-Vietnam veterans and his Agent Orange claim has sailed through just fine! That unexpected piece of good news is a blessing for my entire week!

We can only hope enough veterans and our advocates raise the question – why isn't the Colorado Constitution faithfully followed in this important area?

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Code of Federal Regulations on Unemployability

Following is the Code of Federal Regulations governance of VA unemployability ratings. Note that VA considers Permanent and Total Unemployability awards (TDIU) to be "a rating of 100 percent service-connected disability based on individual unemployability"

§3.340   Total and permanent total ratings and unemployability.

(a) Total disability ratings—(1) General. Total disability will be considered to exist when there is present any impairment of mind or body which is sufficient to render it impossible for the average person to follow a substantially gainful occupation. Total disability may or may not be permanent. Total ratings will not be assigned, generally, for temporary exacerbations or acute infectious diseases except where specifically prescribed by the schedule.
(2) Schedule for rating disabilities. Total ratings are authorized for any disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities prescribes a 100 percent evaluation or, with less disability, where the requirements of paragraph 16, page 5 of the rating schedule are present or where, in pension cases, the requirements of paragraph 17, page 5 of the schedule are met.
(3) Ratings of total disability on history. In the case of disabilities which have undergone some recent improvement, a rating of total disability may be made, provided:
(i) That the disability must in the past have been of sufficient severity to warrant a total disability rating;
(ii) That it must have required extended, continuous, or intermittent hospitalization, or have produced total industrial incapacity for at least 1 year, or be subject to recurring, severe, frequent, or prolonged exacerbations; and
(iii) That it must be the opinion of the rating agency that despite the recent improvement of the physical condition, the veteran will be unable to effect an adjustment into a substantially gainful occupation. Due consideration will be given to the frequency and duration of totally incapacitating exacerbations since incurrence of the original disease or injury, and to periods of hospitalization for treatment in determining whether the average person could have reestablished himself or herself in a substantially gainful occupation.
(b) Permanent total disability. Permanence of total disability will be taken to exist when such impairment is reasonably certain to continue throughout the life of the disabled person. The permanent loss or loss of use of both hands, or of both feet, or of one hand and one foot, or of the sight of both eyes, or becoming permanently helpless or bedridden constitutes permanent total disability. Diseases and injuries of long standing which are actually totally incapacitating will be regarded as permanently and totally disabling when the probability of permanent improvement under treatment is remote. Permanent total disability ratings may not be granted as a result of any incapacity from acute infectious disease, accident, or injury, unless there is present one of the recognized combinations or permanent loss of use of extremities or sight, or the person is in the strict sense permanently helpless or bedridden, or when it is reasonably certain that a subsidence of the acute or temporary symptoms will be followed by irreducible totality of disability by way of residuals. The age of the disabled person may be considered in determining permanence.
(c) Insurance ratings. A rating of permanent and total disability for insurance purposes will have no effect on ratings for compensation or pension.
[26 FR 1585, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981]

§3.341   Total disability ratings for compensation purposes.

(a) General. Subject to the limitation in paragraph (b) of this section, total-disability compensation ratings may be assigned under the provisions of §3.340. However, if the total rating is based on a disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities provides an evaluation of less than 100 percent, it must be determined that the service-connected disabilities are sufficient to produce unemployability without regard to advancing age.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)
(b) Incarcerated veterans. A total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability which would first become effective while a veteran is incarcerated in a Federal, State or local penal institution for conviction of a felony, shall not be assigned during such period of incarceration. However, where a rating for individual unemployability exists prior to incarceration for a felony and routine review is required, the case will be reconsidered to determine if continued eligibility for such rating exists.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5313(c))
(c) Program for vocational rehabilitation. Each time a veteran is rated totally disabled on the basis of individual unemployability during the period beginning after January 31, 1985, the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service will be notified so that an evaluation may be offered to determine whether the achievement of a vocational goal by the veteran is reasonably feasible.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163)
[46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 52774, Dec. 26, 1985; 55 FR 17271, Apr. 24, 1990l; 58 FR 32445, June 10, 1993; 68 FR 34542, June 10, 2003]

Friday, February 26, 2016

VA Statement re: Permanent & Total Service-Connected Unemployability Ratings & "Unemployability"

In response to my inquiry, VA's Senior Management and Program Analyst at Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs emailed me the following confirmation that VA's details for permanent and total individual unemployability are worded the same as Colorado's constitution, at least, that's how the federal government reads their program and Colorado's statute.

The gentleman's name is obscured here but has been provided to CODVA authorities.

Readers here are reminded that the constitution holds that Colorado will go by ratings of the US Department of Veterans Affairs regarding eligibility for the property tax exemption, which reads: "BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT  OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT,"

Sxxxxxxx, Exxx, VBAVACO                      Feb 8






to meBenDavidLinda

We’d be happy to answer any questions Mr. Mestas and CO DVA have.  As I mentioned in my previous response, VA does consider some IU ratings, such as the one you provided as an example, to be permanent and total (P&T).  P&T IU ratings are clearly marked as such. 

Ex.. 
However, this VA opinion and the clear, very plain language in the law have proved immaterial to CODA officials. These unelected staffers simply inserted their own interpretation of Colorado's constitutional amendment and are determined to block many fully eligible veterans and their survivors now classified by VA as "permanent and total" via unemployability.

BTW, "unemployability" to VA is based solely on line of duty illnesses or injuries, and on VA's careful assessment only of the veteran's service-connected issues as being completely, totally, permanently disabling for life, and to total 100& in the overall appraisal of the veteran.

Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs Stumbles on Property Tax Exemption for Disabled Vets & Widows

Colorado statue on disabled veteran property tax relief: §§ 39-3-202(2) and (3) and 203(1.5) to (5), C.R.S:
"rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force."

Issues.
(1) Required to follow the 2007 legislation, Colorado Department of Veterans Affairs excludes recognition of US military disability retirements, despite provision in the constitution and blocks such veterans from the disabled veteran property tax exemption.
(2) Missing from the Constitution but added somehow by CODVA as their own disqualifier are veterans with “unemployability” VA ratings. US Department of Veterans Affairs ratings for permanent and total disability with unemployability (TDIU) are unacceptable to CODVA, blocking many qualified veterans, and their survivors, from any disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Generally, veterans who receive 100% VA disability compensation pension benefits are free to work and are not limited in the amount of earnings they may receive, even when their single- or combined-impairment ratings total 100%. For example, office or sedentary workers such as clerks, lawyers, telephone workers and others may be totally disabled from military line of duty illness or injury yet fully able to continue gainful and satisfying employment although rated 100% disabled by VA for loss of use of legs.

Not so a TDIU disabled vet, professionally judged by VA, Social Security or state rehabilitation agency. That veteran’s service-connected disabilities are sufficient, without regard to other factors, and so severe as to prevent performing the mental and/or physical tasks required to get or keep substantially gainful employment. TDIU recognizes only permanent and totally disabling service-connected issues via an extra-schedular construct. A TDIU veteran is even barred by VA from employment rehab services because no employment is deemed possible.

Permanent and total disability individual unemployability (TDIU) is a recognition that service connected disabilities, while not rated individually at 100%, are complete enough in their totality to equal 100% and to prohibit employment and are in total, permanent and completely disabling. Diseases and injuries of long standing that are actually totally incapacitating will be regarded as permanently and totally disabling when the probability of permanent improvement under treatment is remote.

Permanence of total disability is taken to exist when such impairment is reasonably certain to continue throughout the life of the disabled person. Total disability is considered to exist when there is present any impairment of mind or body that is sufficient to render it impossible for the average person to follow a substantially gainful occupation.

Generally, a vet qualifying for TDIU would also meet SSI requirements for disability benefits, but the same is not true regarding SSDI recipients and TDIU because TDIU is awarded only for military line of duty issues that cause complete and permanent disability. The military services infrequently award such total disability retirements for service members whose injuries or illnesses are completely disabling and considered to be unimproved for life, but all military disability ratings, even for combat, are not accepted by CODVA which recognizes only the US Department of Veterans Affairs decisions, but then, not including VA’s permanent and total service-connected unemployability disability awards. The means by which CODVA excludes military disability retirements is not known, even though its provision is clearly constitutional and blocking these veterans is clearly unconstitutional!

Generally speaking, disregard for military disability ratings and VA TDIU ratings seems unique among states providing property tax relief. For instance, Virginia’s statutes:
A veteran is considered to have a 100 percent service-connected disability if:
• The veteran's disability is rated at 100%; or
• The veteran's service-connection is rated at less than 100%, but the veteran is paid at the 100% disability rate due to unemployability.

NOTE: Under either standard, the disability must be considered total and permanent. Veterans with temporary disabilities do not qualify.

Some Legislative History of the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

The problem: Colorado's voters defined "qualified disabled veteran via a Constitutional amendment (Referendum E). Presently the Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs unfairly excludes from the benefit qualified veterans with permanent "unemployability" VA awards, and also excludes veterans directly retired by the military services per permanent and total disability.

Military disability retired property tax relief for Colorado's totally disabled military veterans is based on the 2006 amendment to the state Constitution. The wording of the title of Referendum E is inclusive of any "United States Military veteran who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability." 

Nowhere in the Constitution nor other legislation does the "unemployability"appear. It was added as an exemption only by extra-legal preference of the CDMVA, contrary to the Constitution.

Here is the full title, approved by the voters:
AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY
Here's the text of Referendum E's definition of "disabled veteran:"
(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL yGUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, OR HOMELAND SECURITY. 
(note: There is a minor conflict between the referendum's pension language and its requirement that disabilities be service-connected – the VA pension program is based on low-income and need, not service-connected disabilities. There is no such thing as 100% service-connected disability pensions.)

The 2007 Legislature "fine tuned" Section 3.5 of Article X from the 2006 Constitutional amendment. It bypassed the voter-approved "any veteran," dropped the pension, but  very improperly redefined and restricted the definition of "qualifying veteran" by failure to adhere to the broad and inclusive language of the voter-approved referendum.
"(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department. "
The 2007 Legislature errored in its modification of the definition of "qualifying veteran" away from that approved by the electorate and per the Constitution. This amounted to an ex post facto law depriving many formerly qualified disabled veterans from the Constitution's protection regarding property tax. Further, this violates the US Constitution by depriving the affected veterans of their property (the tax benefit) without due process. From the Colorado Constitution's Bill of Rights:
"Section 11. Ex post facto laws. No ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

The "Unemployability" TDIU estriction on Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, Overturning Voters' Constitutional Amendment

Wording on Colorado counties' disabled veteran property tax exemption forms:
The 2007 enabling legislation forces CMDVA to a somewhat restricted eligibility compared to the broader constitution's provisions::
"An individual who sustained a service-connected disability that has been rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as 100% “permanent and total.” VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."

Readers will please note that the word "unemployability" appears only on county forms and various state brochures describing the disabled veteran property tax program: nowhere does that exclusion exist in the law! It was simply added by CDMVA acting on legislative input.