VICTORY FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES!

AMENDMENT E APPROVED BY 88% OF COLORADO VOTERS!

In a sweeping victory for the United Veterans of Colorado and Gold Star Spouses, voters approved amending the Colorado Constitution Article X Section 3.5 to extend the partial property tax exemption to Gold Star Spouses.

 Several years of efforts, of resolutions passed by the American Legion, leadership of the UVC and patience of the Gold Star spouses themselves, all finally came to the best possible resolution – not only passed as required with 55% of the voters approving, but by an overwhelming 88%.

UVC Identifies 2022 Veterans' State Legislative Objectives

At today's executive committee meeting of the United Veterans Coalition, leaders identified Gold Star Spouses' property tax exemption as our Number One state legislative objective for the 74th General Assembly of the Colorado legislature. 

Colorado's Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) veterans' property tax exemption was selected as the coalition's Number Two goal going into the next legislative season!

Both objectives deal with Colorado's Constitution, Article X Section 3.5 and the small partial property tax exemption presently offered seniors, totally and permanently disabled veterans, and their survivors.

The Colorado Bar Association had already indicated its support for both objectives.

Co-chairs Shelly Shelly Kalkowski and Robbie Robinson presented their state legislative committee 2022 general goals and specific objectives, finalized just prior to this morning's executive committee gathering. 

Thank you, UVC!

Scan codes to download our Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption briefer and our Powerpoint talk

These will be go to our Google Drive files for the most current version of the one page brief, the longer full background report, and the PowerPoint presentation that's been used so far. The Colorado National Guard is mentioned throughout but will be only more generally referenced in a later version.

1.The two page shortest possible handout is linked here.

2. Full 12-page brief:
Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N0HT08Ykq4gHjoQnB-8zU4dudaWLtdLn/view?usp=sharing

3. PowerPoint briefing (18mb): Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SpTlf_i0ttwSEjTuuC4TWbNR6S5CSU5O/view?usp=sharing

4. Background Files Collection (120 pages)
Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15k0Ee2ddxtgJtzP4_pH_S7qUnL36VEHZ/view?usp=sharing

Equal Treatment for Colorado Gold Star Wives!

 

Gold Star Wives Poster - Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

Correct! It seems our state legislature simply didn't contemplate the possibility of Colorado soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines dying on active duty. That's why Colorado seem to have forgotten to offer our Gold Star Wives the same widows' benefits as we provide to survivors of totally disabled veterans.

That's unjust and plain WRONG! But not a single widow of an active duty service member is permitted the Colorado Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption, a small exemption saving widows between $400-$600 a year.

Why? Our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5 permits the exemption only to widows of disabled veterans already in receipt of the benefit. Dying on Active Duty means not being able to complete the application process – because the service member died first!

This is Really an Amazing and Ridiculous Catch-22!

Why is the small property tax exemption of value to Gold Star Wives?

First, it shows the state's respect and appreciation for the loss borne by these widows and widowers. The partial tax exemption would only save about $400 to $600. It would seem a minor issue to most of us. 

But look at this from a Gold Star Widow's perspective. Circumstances vary, but if eligible widows can receive half of the service member's base pay. More than half of all military deaths are E-5 and below. An Army E-5 three-stripe sergeant would have a widow pension of under $2,000 per month.

The VA has "Dependents Indemnity Compensation," where if eligible a survivor might receive $1,300 per month. So, at best, our late sergeant's widow (or widower) hopes for a modest $39,000 per year.

How far does that go? In Colorado, the average home mortgage cost is $1,700 per month, and with typical associated costs like taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance, a monthly cost of over $2,400 or $28,000 annually. You can do the math – that leaves $916 per month for food, transportation, insurance, clothing. 

Summary: Colorado Life did a thorough report on the money necessary to live in Colorado one needs $4,317.68 per month to live in Colorado if there is a mortgage involved. Oops – that leaves our widow short by over $12,000 per year. That's why the paltry $400-$600 partial property tax exemption is important. 

The burden of property tax is a huge reason so many citizens can never afford a home, and that's even more true for military folks. That's why so few junior military own homes at the time of death and why so few widows are affected by this proposed tax exemption.

For me, I wish it was a total tax exemption as many states provide! The survivor of a service member who dies on active duty obviously have to make many, many compromises to live on $12,000 less per year than what "average" citizens need.

I think I'll do a poster based on the graphic above, but try to get the word count reduced.

Monday was Gold Star Spouse Day. Here are Five Things to Know

Here is an article about 5 things to know about Gold Star Spouses Day. I'll add another: Colorado denies survivors of active duty troops the property tax exemption provided survivors of totally disabled veterans, 

 Mandy Baker

Posted On April 29, 2020 16:11:43

Gold Star Spouses Day has its origins way back to World War I. The families of servicemen would fly banners and hang them in their windows. These banners had a blue star to represent a service member in uniform. But, if their loved one was killed in action, the color of the star was changed from blue to gold, thus notifying the community the ultimate price that family had paid for their country.

---

1. The Gold Star lapel pin was created in 1947

Following the popularity of the banners, in 1947, Congress approved the design for the official Gold Star lapel pin/button. This was introduced to represent service members who had died in combat. The pin takes the form of a gold star on a purple background.

2. The military bestows the Gold Star upon families 

During the funeral service of the fallen military member, senior officers present the Gold Star Pin in addition to the national colors to the spouse or next of kin as a mark of respect for their sacrifice.

3. Gold Star Wives/Spouses Day began in 2010

In 2010, the first Gold Star Wives Day was observed. Two years later the Senate passed a resolution that codified Gold Star Wives Day, which was set to be observed April 5th each year. To make it more inclusive this was changed later and renamed Gold Star Spouses Day.

4. Gold Star Spouses Day raises awareness

Gold Star Spouses Day brings awareness of the sacrifices and grief these spouses have faced in the name of their country. However, possibly more importantly, it brings awareness for the Gold Star survivors themselves of the large network of resources and assistance that is available to them. A few examples of the resources available to these spouses are: Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors (TAPS), scholarship resources which include the Pat Tillman Scholarship and the Fisher House Foundation Scholarship for Military Children, in addition to the Army’s Survivor Outreach Services (SOS).

5. Gold Star Spouses Day is observed in many ways

While Gold Star Spouses Day is not a national holiday, there are many installations that have their own programs to observe this day. Many of the installation observances focus on the military fitness and lifestyle. For instance, there are quite a few remembrance 5Ks which are run on April 5. There are also remembrance efforts seen online and on social media. One such effort is the Facebook campaign which urges Gold Star families to share photos and memories of their fallen loved ones.

While Gold Star Spouses Day is one day set aside each April to acknowledge the sacrifices of these military family members, their grief and loss is something that should be remembered each and every day. These special families have lost a loved one in the name of freedom, in the name of the United States. Their family member willingly fought, served and gave that ultimate sacrifice. This is something that should never be overlooked or forgotten, rather is something that should be acknowledged every day. Without these tragic losses, Americans would not have the freedoms they hold so dear, nor would America be the proud country that it has always been. It is only through the willingness to give everything that Americans have the ability to hold onto the patriotic pride that is so important.

This Gold Star Spouses Day, and every day, take the time to remember these families that have given so much. Never take for granted the freedoms America has been given and fought for. Keep these sacrifices in mind each day, and be grateful for the men and women who are so willing to pay that ultimate price for their country. Whether you take to social media or see one at your local military installation, thank a Gold Star Spouse today.

IS EXCLUSION OF UNEMPLOYABLE, PERMANENTLY AND TOTALLY DISABLED VETERANS WHAT WE VOTED FOR? What about "VA Unemployability" disability ratings?*

(From the 2006 Blue Cook - what we were asked to approve. See my 2017 here, and my 2021 analysis below*)

Legislative Council of the Colorado General Assembly

REFERENDUM E:
 Summary and Analysis  (Research Pub. No. 554)

How does the program work?

Homeowners pay property taxes based on the value of their home and the tax rate set by the local governments where they live. Referendum E reduces the taxable value of a qualified veteran's home by one-half of the first $200,000 of the home's value, thereby lowering property taxes owed on the home. The state legislature can adjust the $200,000 amount to either increase or decrease the benefit from Referendum E in future years. 

Currently, the state offers the same property tax reduction to homeowners age 65 and over who have lived in their homes for at least ten years. A qualifying veteran who is also eligible for a reduction in property taxes as a senior cannot claim both reductions. The dollar amount of the tax reduction will vary among homeowners depending upon the local property tax rate, the home's value, and the amount of the exemption. 

Who qualifies for the tax reduction? Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability qualify for the tax reduction in Referendum E. Colorado National Guard members injured while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces also qualify. Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong. (1)

Nationally, less than one percent of veterans have a 100-percent permanent disability rating. About 2,200 veterans are expected to qualify for the property tax reduction in Colorado. 

What are the fiscal implications? Referendum E affects property taxes paid beginning in 2008. The average property tax savings for those who qualify will be about $466. The total reduction in property taxes is estimated to be about $1 million in the first year.(2)

 The state is required to reimburse local governments for the reduction in property tax revenue resulting from Referendum E. 

Arguments For:

1) Colorado needs to do more to help veterans who have sacrificed their health for our nation and state.(3) Many states offer a property tax reduction for disabled veteran homeowners, and six states do not require these veterans to pay any property taxes. (4)

 Referendum E provides one way, at a modest cost, for Colorado to thank 100-percent permanently disabled veterans for their service. 

2) The money that Referendum E saves qualifying veterans can improve their quality of life. Despite existing government benefits, veterans still have unmet financial needs that are tied to their disability. 

Unlike most other citizens, 100-percent permanently disabled veterans have very limited opportunities to improve their quality of life through employment and other means. (5)

Referendum E is an opportunity for the state to at least partially offset this economic disadvantage. 

Arguments Against: 

1) Referendum E is a special interest tax break that benefits less than one-twentieth of one percent of all Colorado residents. When one group benefits financially from a tax reduction, other taxpayers must pay. If the state can afford to reduce taxes for certain taxpayer groups, it should reduce taxes for all taxpayers. Referendum E further singles out a portion of the taxpayers it proposes to help by reducing taxes for 100-percent disabled veterans who are financially able to own homes. Disabled veterans who do not own a home do not benefit from this proposal. (6)

2) Because veterans were in the service of the federal government, the responsibility to meet the financial needs of veterans rests with the federal government. By creating a new state program for a small group of veterans, Referendum E interferes with the balance of benefits set by the federal government. In addition, the recent focus on international conflicts may lead voters to believe the state is providing a benefit to only those veterans who were injured in a combat zone when in fact the injury may have resulted while on call or during a time when the United States was not at war. 

Estimate of Fiscal Impact:
Referendum E increases state expenditures because it requires the state to reimburse local governments for reduced property tax collections. The state estimates that roughly 2,200 disabled veterans will qualify for the exemption and the average property tax reduction per veteran will be $466. Thus, the impact to the state will be slightly more than $1 million, beginning with the 2008 budget year.(7)

------------here's my assessment after 3 years study-----------

1.  Notice no mention of unemployability, the disqualifier added by Colorado's legislators, DOLA or CDMVA,  isn't in the Blue Book, but "disabled veteran" is clearly described. Voters are told the benefit we approve is for "Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability" and "100-percent permanently disabled veterans have very limited opportunities to improve their quality of life through employment and other means. The more exact term for this is "total disability for individual unemployability." or TDIU. It is total, and it is permanent. TDIU and 100% schedular disability ratings are about 8% of VA Disabled veterans (TDIU and 100% schedular) are about 8% of VA disability ratings. Nationwide, there are about 800,000 such ratings.

Unemployability, as defined by VA, from their web site:

"VA Individual Unemployability if you can't work

If you can’t work because of a disability related to your service in the military (a service-connected disability), you may qualify for what’s called “Individual Unemployability.” This means you may be able to get disability compensation or benefits at the same level as a Veteran who has a 100% disability rating.

Am I eligible for disability benefits from VA? You may be eligible for disability benefits if you meet both of the requirements listed below.

Both of these must be true:

You have at least 1 service-connected disability rated at 60% or more disabling, or 2 or more service-connected disabilities—with at least 1 rated at 40% or more disabling and a combined rating of 70% or more—and

You can’t hold down a steady job that supports you financially (known as substantially gainful employment) because of your service-connected disability. Odd jobs (marginal employment) don’t count."

TDIU is total, and it is permanent. TDIU veterans are actually not able or even permitted to work because VA has examined them and determined that their combination of service-connected disabilities make it impossible to do so. VA even monitors IRS and Social Security records to double-check veterans awarded this disability rating, although vets are permitted odd jobs. Vets with the "regular" VA rating of 100% disability are permitted to work and encouraged to try doing so if possible for good mental and physical health and for economic security.

2.  The total veterans and qualified survivors is currently 5858, compared to 245,000 receiving the senior exemption, with an annual budget impact of $3,524,000 vs. $136,000,000 for seniors.

3. Colorado ranks just a modest 25th among the states in veterans' benefits. Many studies have proved the fact that the more veteran-friendly a state is, the more likely to benefit from veterans living there. The money and the needs of Colorado's military retirees, and disabled vets plus survivors created over 26,000 good Colorado jobs in 2020. As for the disabled veteran survivor property tax exemption, nobody expects a veteran's survivor to relocate here to save $645. Those who do from whatever state, are to be honored and eligible for the exemption we seek. Disabled veterans bring into Colorado VA checks for almost $2,000,000,000 to spend on food, clothing, shelter, medical care entertainment, travel – the cost to Colorado in its meager state benefits is a pittance against this. Totally disabled veterans' dependence on state public assistance is insignificant.

4.  Currently nineteen states (up from six in 2006) waive all property taxes for disabled veterans and survivors. Most more states offering an exemption larger exemption offer more than Colorado. Only a few offer no exemption.

5. A TDIU veteran receives at most $37,570 per year, still a low range where many agencies assist families. This will be the vet's income throughout his/her life with no pay raises, no promotions, nothing beyond the VA monthly check. When most non-disabled veterans and civilians are approaching retirement age, having acquired wealth, home, car, etc., the average income is over $57,000 per year, leaving disabled veterans far, far behind. The younger the veteran when disabled, the further behind with age. Bankruptcies are common. 

6. Home ownership is usually out of reach. However, any savings helps them afford to qualify for and continue to afford their own homes.

7. A TDIU veteran receives at most $37,570 per year, still a low range where many agencies assist families. This will be the vet's income throughout his/her life with no pay raises, no promotions, nothing beyond the VA monthly check. When most non-disabled veterans and civilians are approaching retirement age, having acquired wealth, home, car, etc., the average income is over $57,000 per year, leaving disabled veterans far, far behind. The younger the veteran when disabled, the further behind with age. Bankruptcies are common. 

Gold Star Wives Day, April 5 2016. A resolution of the United States Senate

April 5, 2016

Gold Star Wives Day

by resolution of the

United States Senate

Briefing Package – Problems with Colorado's Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, & Recommended Solutions

Background & source documents

We have summed up the issues with HB07-1251, Referendum E, and Article X Section 3.5 of the Colorado Constitution...CLICK to download the complete briefing packet.

Also quite informative is the legislative history for HB07-1251. CLICK to download that 33-page resource.

Families of Troops Killed in Line-of-Duty – Denied Surviving Spouse Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

If a disabled vet isn't already in receipt if the property tax exemption, the survivor is forever forbidden this important benefit. The system is set up so that widows and widowers of troops killed in the line-of duty will never get the benefit. (click for Gold Star Families' blog on this)

How does Colorado keep troops'' widows from receiving the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption?

Colorado's "PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED DISABLED VETERAN" form explains that the widow or widower of a totally and permanently 100% service-connected veteran:

"The veteran to whom the applicant was married must have applied for and been granted the disabled veterans property tax exemption as provided by § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), C.R.S., prior to his or her death" (Colorado CMDVA Form 15-DPT-AR DV-002-07/14) 

Very clearly, CMDVA's form discourages widows from applying unless the veteran was already receiving Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption. This is even though no prohibition can be found in the constitution or the state's laws as regards the veteran's receipt before death.

Other confusing barriers pop up to frustrate Colorado's most disabled veterans and their survivors. Colorado's constitution spells out the exemption's qualification requirements, but as this blog has carefully detailed, legislation enacted in 2007 to accommodate Referendum E (which became Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution) didn't properly address two vital provisions in the constitution:

(1) HB07-1251 left out the constitution's provision for totally disabled military retirees, and (2)  the Division of Military Affairs added somehow a barrier to VA's Permanent and Total Individual Unemployability (TDIU.)

Vets who've been around the block with the US Department of Veterans Affairs will tell anyone asking how slow the VA is in making its disability awards. Even the simplist 100% disability rating can take years following the initial injury while on duty. Following the Gulf War, this writer was retired by the Air Force with a permanent and total 100% service connected disability military retirement effective in 1996, yet the VA 100% service connected rating didn't follow until 2015! Thus, Colorado denied its tax exemption even though the constitution clearly provides for it. Further, Colorado refused to recognize the VA's TDIU rating dating from 1998,

Were I to have died from my Gulf War injuries or at any time from 1991 until my VA rating came through in 2015, my widow would be forever denied the exemption regardless of my clear eligibility.

Colorado has been doing this to hundreds of disabled veterans' widows and widowers (Gold Star families) since 2007 when HB07-1251 was signed by the governor. For nine years, we have refused the tax exemption to survivors whose veterans were qualified by military disability retirements or TDIU VA disability ratings. Colorado also refuses it to active duty personnel who die in service because, obviously, they never were able to apply for the exemption and thus, their widows are refused.

Does this make sense, after reading the Blue Book's comprehensive description of the goal for Referendum E, or does it make sense after reading Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution? The answer should be no. CMDVA's interpretation of the statute, even though it seems in step with the constitution, has drifted far from what the electorate approved by a 78% margin in the 2006 election.

Until a more compassionate program is established, this year's' military widows will join the ranks of those between 2007 and 2016 in being refused this vital, well-earned benefit.

Legislative History of HB07-1251, statutes to implement Referendum E [Article X Section 3.5 , "Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption"]

I learned more history about the senior and disabled veteran property tax exemption, based on some research conducted in the Capital Thursday morning. Kind folks in the Colorado Legislative Counsel's office provided a.complete history of the evolution of HB07-1251, the statute which implemented Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution, following approval by the electorate of Referendum E. Our next step will be listening to the audio tapes of deliberations.

CLC's Blue Book, the Legislature's "sales brochure" promoting the referendum, described the veterans to be covered by the referendum:

"Who qualifies for the tax reduction? Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability qualify for the tax reduction in Referendum E. Colorado National Guard members injured while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces also qualify. Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong.Nationally, less than one percent of veterans have a 100-percent permanent disability rating. About 2,200 veterans are expected to qualify for the property tax reduction in Colorado."

The first version of HB07-1251's description of qualified veteran was exactly as per Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution as it remains today:

 (1.5) For purposes of this section, "disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force. 

The next version of HB07-1251 ("Engrossed" version) made the changes in definition of qualified veteran. Those changes remained static thereafter until signed by the governor.

(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department.

(Simply dropped from the final statute was the last phrase of the constitution., "through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force.")

CONCLUSION:
1. In its Blue Book for 2006, the Legislature obviously included, and the electorate approved, Colorado veterans whose disabilities were total, permanent, service-connected and that made veterans unemployable. In the actual wording for Referendum E, however, no specific mention was made of unemployable terms, and still the VA rating for unemployability complies with the referendum's specifics. CdmVA ends up refusing these totally disabled vets the exemption, opposite the people's goal.

2. The Legislature's first pass at legislation also had no reference to employability issues but did specify military permanent and total disability retirements as qualified for the property tax exemption. By the second version (Engrossed) military disability retirements were not mentioned, and that version of the definition was carried into the stature and into effect today.

3. Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs complies with the statute, not the constitution, and denies property tax exemption to two groups of disabled veterans specified by the people when we amended the constitution to add the exemption to veterans. For some reason not apparent in the legislative history of HB07-1251, "unemployability" went from acceptable to specifically refused by CDMVA. The constitutional provision recognizing military service disability ratings was cut from HB07-1251 in the Engrossed version, without comment...it just disappeared. CMDVA also excludes those veterans which obviously conflicts with the constitution.

Colorado will fix the problems surrounding Article X Section 3.5...but when? Will it be too late?

Correct the property tax exemption!

Colorado's legislative leadership needs to carefully consider approving a "late bill" this session. This year, not next! Next year is too late for too many of us. Too late for our widows also!

There's pressure against any such late bills introduced after Senate and House deadlines unless the proposed statute addresses issues serious problems that must be corrected without delay.

I contend that's us. Having had our Constitutional rights denied for eight years since Referendum E was approved in 2006, unless legislation is approved this year it will be 2018 before the property tax exemption is of any benefit. If House or Senate leaders insist on postponing introduction of legislation fixing the problem, a bill passed next year will be approved too late for 2017 taxes and veterans won't have use of the exemption until the following year.

Because a totally disabled veteran is not just a veteran, but one with grievous, life-changing military injuries or illnesses. Only one percent of all disabled veterans are 100% service-connected. These injuries or illnesses drastically reduce our remaining years. Our families are hit hard, especially kids as we try to live going forward on a VA disability check...hard to look forward to high school and college.

Cancer, paralysis, loss of arms or legs, ALS...it takes a very serious issue for VA to rate a veteran at 100% disabled and thus, eligible for the disabled veteran property tax exemption. Colorado's mistakes in the 2007 legislation passed to implement Resolution E (Article X Section 3.5) have denied property tax relief for eight years and we just can't wait too much longer. Further, our widows are forever denied the property tax exemption unless, before our deaths, we'd been receiving the benefit.

We don't have years to wait. There's real meaning behind the phrase "Constitutional Rights Delayed are Constitutional Rights Denied." Don't make us wait past our deaths for Colorado to finally resolve the problem caused by the Legislature in 2007 with its lawed statutes on Referendum E. Too many of our fellow veterans have passed during these last eight years when they should have been receiving the property tax exemption – and every one of their widows is now denied the exemption supposedly guaranteed in Article X, Section 3.5 of the Colorado Constitution.

This can and should be fixed by advancing the late bills now with the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House.

What needs to be fixed to comply with Colorado's Constitution Article X Section 3.5?

CLICK FOR BRIEFING PACKAGE

Easy. Everyone swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and we can count on our public servants to correct legislation offensive to the Constitution. Their oaths, plus the clear knowledge that inaction by the Legislature fails Colorado's disabled veterans by denying us our Constitution's protection, make the Legislature's duty obvious.

Easy because it is so very clear. Current defective statutes addressing Article X Section 3.5 so clearly offend the Constitution we can easily summarize what's needed.

Corrective Action:

1. Military service total disability retirements must have enabling statute
2. All barriers to VA's total disability individual unemployability (TDIU) permanent ratings must be removed, but do not need corrective legislation. Regulatory correction suffices because each element of TDIU already satisfies constitutional requirement NOTE: RECOMMENDED: correct the defect in the entire program's failure to accommodate widows of service members who die on active duty, without a chance to qualify for veteran's status 

Justification:

1. Military service total disability retirements are clearly specified in Article X Section 3.5 and must be made acceptable to CDMA
2. The electorate exercised its power to amend the Constitution and approved Referendum E. Voter guidance from Colorado Legislative Council described unemployable disabled veterans, and each specific in Article X Section 3.5 as well as subsequent legislation detailed "permanent, service-connected, 100% total" as qualifying elements. The US Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Benefits Administration confirmed each element is also an element of the VA permanent TDIU disability rating, and VA has offered to brief CDMA and other Colorado agencies.

Colorado's Legislative Council – did they let veterans down on Referendum E?

I'm learning so much as I follow the trail of Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption, the 2006 Referendum E.

What I've learned about is Colorado's legislative process. Reading about it I've got a better picture about the history of our disabled vet property tax exemption and problems now surfacing.

The steps begin with the Legislature sending the language of a referendum to the Legislative Council to insure its legality, compliance with style and format. That means the property tax exemption was carefully worded by the Legislative Council for the specific words by which the Constitution would be amended, and also the words by which the electorate would be guided to an understanding of the referendum adequate to have an informed opinion when voting.

You can see what they did below in the referendum's plain-language description. Attention is drawn to the highlighted words in the "who qualifies for the tax deduction" section. Consider...this was written by the Legislature's "experts"??

"Who qualifies for the tax reduction? Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability qualify for the tax reduction in Referendum E. Colorado National Guard members injured while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces also qualify. Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong. Nationally, less than one percent of veterans have a 100-percent permanent disability rating. About 2,200 veterans are expected to qualify for the property tax reduction in Colorado."

After the voters approved Referendum E by 78% and by it, created Article X Section 3.5 of the Colorado Constitution, it became the job of the Legislature to craft enabling legislation. Once done, that headed over to the Colorado Legislative Council for the same reasons...legal clarity, compliance with the Constitution, form and style. This is where serious problems popped up. Legislation did not match the newly-amended Constitution! The electorate was duped.

What the Legislative Council approved for the Referendum E'/Article X Section 3.5 enabling statute drifted far from what the electorate were told they'd voted for. Struck from the statute was a very important group of veterans the state now cites statute to deny the exemption, even though this category of disabled vet is spelled out in tht Cinstitution. Vets whose injuries leave them unable to work are termed "permanent and total service connected unemployability" ratings. That's bad because the Legislative Council blocked about half of the veterans the electorate voted to help! From the 2006 Blue Book:

"Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong."

Disabled veterans with VA's unemployability disability rating were specified as what the voters were helping, became in the administration of the statute by CMDVA a group specified as unqualified.

That's a complete 180º shift away from the Constitution, enough to disappoint this veteran! 

What is the value of Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption?

Very simply, a totally disabled veteran's property is given a $100,000 exemption from the appraised value. A veteran's widow(er) also receives the exemption if the veteran was receiving the exemption before death. Sadly, no combat deaths qualify because the servicemember wasn't receiving the benefit at death, obviously.

Referendum E was explained to voters as an effort to thank Colorado's veterans whose service left them 100% permanently and totally disabled, about one percent of all veterans.

Vets still pay property tax but that burden is lessened on average about $466. Total cost to the state was estimated at $1,000,000 for extending the benefit to an estimated 2000 veterans.

There is also a benefit to the entire state in encouraging and supporting voluntary military service.

Referendum E, which became Article X Section 3.5 of our state constitution, is Colorado's largest benefit for qualified disabled veterans, although not to be compared to other states like New Hampshire or New Jersey where all property taxes are excused. The public expressed the intent of a little tax help so that totally disabled veterans might get and keep their homes, although the benefit applies only to homeowners. Other states provide different property tax relief. Oregon, for instance, exempts only $18,000 of the assessed value. Connecticut and a few other states offer 100% tax exemption. Colorado wrongly considers itself "somewhat above average" in disabled veterans' benefits. Remember: disabled veterans and military retirees are combat- proven good citizens and also economically beneficial to their states. Their pensions and retirements are huge injections of cash to local economies. Because of federal benefits, they are not burdens, and many states actively target these folks as new residents by offering such things as property and income tax relief.  Colorado can do so much more, especially with free state park camping, tax-exempt military retirement, and more significant property tax exemptions.

Solution? Good hearts in CDMVA and the Legislature?

There's hope in Colorado!

Legislative leadership, CDMVA expertise and United Veterans Committee support might craft a solution to the descriptions between the Colorado Constitution's Article X Section 3.5 and the 2007 statute defining "eligible veteran."

If so, more disabled Colorado veterans can be protected by the disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Thanks to all who care about us!

Our Colorado Constitution – Why isn't it followed?

They all swore to uphold it.

The Colorado Constitution specifies in Article X Section 3.5 that total disability military service retirements qualify veterans for the state's disabled veteran property tax exemption. Colorado's Department of Military and Veterans Affairs has a policy against that ever since the Constitution was amended by Referendum E in 2006 and denies the benefit of the exemption to qualified disabled veterans.

Article XII Section 8.  Oath of civil officers. Every civil officer, except members of the general assembly and such inferior officers as may be by law exempted, shall, before he enters upon the duties of his office, take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to support the constitution of the United States and of the state of Colorado, and to faithfully perform the duties of the office upon which he shall be about to enter. 

Article X Section 3.5 (ignored part in red, abused part in blue)(1.5) For purposes of this section, "disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado national guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits or a pension pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the department of homeland security, or the department of the army, navy, or air force. 

Not only have the last fifteen words in the Constitution's definition of eligible veteran been dropped in the 2007 statute, CMDVA imperfectly follows the requirement to extend the exemption to vets "rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability benefits...pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department." 

This partial state failure is their denial of claims from veterans holding VA's 100% permanent and total service connected disability for unemployment rating. The Constitution and subsequent legislation make no mention of "unemployability" ratings being barred.

Thus, one of two VA total service-connected disability ratings is abused, even though it complies word-for-word with the Colorado Constitution.

Some Legislative History of the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

The problem: Colorado's voters defined "qualified disabled veteran via a Constitutional amendment (Referendum E). Presently the Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs unfairly excludes from the benefit qualified veterans with permanent "unemployability" VA awards, and also excludes veterans directly retired by the military services per permanent and total disability.

Military disability retired property tax relief for Colorado's totally disabled military veterans is based on the 2006 amendment to the state Constitution. The wording of the title of Referendum E is inclusive of any "United States Military veteran who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability." 

Nowhere in the Constitution nor other legislation does the "unemployability"appear. It was added as an exemption only by extra-legal preference of the CDMVA, contrary to the Constitution.

Here is the full title, approved by the voters:

AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY Here's the text of Referendum E's definition of "disabled veteran:"

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL yGUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, OR HOMELAND SECURITY. 

(note: There is a minor conflict between the referendum's pension language and its requirement that disabilities be service-connected – the VA pension program is based on low-income and need, not service-connected disabilities. There is no such thing as 100% service-connected disability pensions.)

The 2007 Legislature "fine tuned" Section 3.5 of Article X from the 2006 Constitutional amendment. It bypassed the voter-approved "any veteran," dropped the pension, but  very improperly redefined and restricted the definition of "qualifying veteran" by failure to adhere to the broad and inclusive language of the voter-approved referendum.

"(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department. "

The 2007 Legislature errored in its modification of the definition of "qualifying veteran" away from that approved by the electorate and per the Constitution. This amounted to an ex post facto law depriving many formerly qualified disabled veterans from the Constitution's protection regarding property tax. Further, this violates the US Constitution by depriving the affected veterans of their property (the tax benefit) without due process. From the Colorado Constitution's Bill of Rights:

"Section 11. Ex post facto laws. No ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."