United Veterans Committee Crafting State Legislative Agenda for 2022. TDIU Veterans Issue Proposed to the Committee

Among many other proposals, the United Veterans Coalition state legislative affairs committee is considering vets rated by VA as 100% Total Disability for Individual Unemployability veterans (TDIU) for the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. This issue is being weighed for inclusion in the UVC 2022 legislative agenda to be firmed up this summer for the next legislative session.

The decision will be based on input from all levels of UVC organizational members. This is an issue I've advocated about for six years. I ask everyone to get behind this agenda item, voicing your support directly to the state legislative affairs committee and the executive committee as all such potential agenda issues are being weighed this summer.  

Inclusion of TDIU veterans affects about 2,000 Colorado vet homeowners and survivors, at a cost to Colorado at about $2.6M. Voters originally approved the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption as Referendum E in 2006. The Blue Book described the benefit for "totally disabled veterans unable to work" due to line-of-duty injuries and illnesses. Somehow, "unemployability" was written into the enabling legislation and statue after the amendment was approved. That's not what the voters thought we were approving.

I hope the legislature to include these ignored 100% disabled veterans by exercising its authority to redefine "qualified veteran." A revised statute can include TDIU vets. 

Colorado utilizes VA definitions for management of veterans benefits, so it is very telling to see VA's own rules from VAM21-1 on TDIU. Read carefully, and compare to the language of Referendum E, the enabling statute and the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption form and instructions.

As for Gold Star Wives, the Legislative Support Staff calculated the cost to Colorado would be only $93,000, so it is very, very hard to understand why every Democrat voted against these 140 Gold Star Wives' much too small a benefit.

United Veterans Coalition Considering Agenda Item: Property Tax Exemption for Gold Star Wives

 The United Veterans Coalition state legislative affairs committee is considering addition of the Gold Star Wives Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption for inclusion in the 2022 legislative agenda.

The decision will be based on input from the Gold Star Wives and other primary organization members. I encourage everyone having an opinion on the issue to voice it through their primary group representatives.

The issue was unanimously approved by the Colorado House in the session just ended but killed by the Senate Military and Veterans Affairs Committee. The idea was to submit a referendum to the voters next term, amending the constitution's Article X Section 3.5 to include these active-duty troops' survivors. I believe the change could have been made via statute, a much easier path than changing the consitution.

The Legislative Support Staff calculated the cost to Colorado would be only $93,000, so it is very, very hard to understand why every Democrat voted against these 140 Gold Star Wives' small benefit.

COLORADO SENATE SNUBBED FAMILIES – KILLED GOLD STAR WIVES' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

June 7 2021: Colorado Senate killed Gold Star Wives bill for
given survivors of totally disabled veterans (HCR21-1002

Last week the Colorado Senate really disappointed me. It killed a bill to include Gold Star Wives (widows of troops who die in the line of duty) the same small property tax exemption given widows of totally disabled veterans.

Did senators think our widows don't need the exemption to keep their homes and survive on the puny $1350 per month VA death benefit?

Thousands of survivors of Colorado's disabled vets already get this exemption as they should – but the Senate refused it to our 140 Gold Star Wives. These survivors are denied the exemption only because their servicemembers died in the line of duty on active duty rather than as disabled veterans after active duty.

Esteemed Senators: did you give this any thought before you killed HCR21-1002, passed unanimously by the House?

 

COLORADO SENATE DISHONORS ITS OWN RESOLUTION "HONORING" GOLD STAR FAMILIES

I'D CALL IT A JOKE BUT IT ISN'T.

One month ago the Colorado Legislature payed its respects to Gold Star Families* with a sweetly-worded joint resolution. Passed unanimously, the resolution praised the patriotism and dedication of families of Colorado's soldiers, sailors, Marines and Airmen who've died in the line of duty:

Right. Uh-huh. Fellow Coloradans, SJR21-010 wasn't worth the postage to mail it to the survivors. Neither was it enough of "an expression of profound gratitude and respect" to move the mighty senators to more carefully consider HCR21-1002. It certainly wasn't worth the esteemed committee of law-makers' bipartisan review. Instead, on a party-line vote, all Dems voted NO and the outnumbered Republicans voted YES.

What did they shoot down? Spending $93,000 to qualify just 140 Gold Star Widows the same small partial property tax exemption we give thousands of widows of our 100% disabled veterans. The situations are quite similar, except the disabled vets made it home and qualified for the exemption; dead servicemembers could not. The total impact of the Gold Star Widows would have been a "whopping" 0.00062 increase. Wow, how generous (not.)

That's the only difference. The tax law states for survivors to have the disabled veteran property tax exemption, their disabled veteran must have received it before his/her death. As you can imagine, a death on active-duty, and in the line of duty, pretty much precludes coming home disabled to apply for and get the exemption. 

Perhaps legislators who crafted the Seniors' and Disabled Veterans' Survivor Exemption (HB14-1373) did not pause to consider that not all troops make it home. Most do. A few of them are 100% disabled and can qualify for the exemption and so will their survivors. However, the very few who will never come home will never qualify their survivors only because they died first.

HCR21-1002 was an effort to correct this macabre injustice in our tax laws. I'm a totally disabled veteran in receipt of the exemption, and my wife will keep it as my survivor. Had I died in service she would be disqualified. Only because of awkward wording on our tax code.

June 7 was an opportunity to make things right, and to honor the resolution Colorado passed to respect Gold Star Families. June 7 was a missed opportunity to make good law. Shame on those who thought otherwise.

The Senate committee may not have realized that 90% of these widows are over 57, and 40% over age 75.  Or if the senators did know, perhaps they were appreciating that, given the survivors' average age, putting off a solution for their property taxes will have nature taking her usual course. The Senate can anticipate that year by year, for as long as the Senate is able to prevent any relief, there'll be fewer and fewer Gold Star Wives surviving to take advantage of any exemption.

What might be the reasons Gold Star Wives might want to be included in the exemption if they happen to be senior citizens eligible right now?
1. sell the marital home and downsize
2. reduce housing costs to adjust to loss of spouse's income

3. conflicts in wills taxes, credit, or other important property details

4. selling home elsewhere to return to Colorado

5. purchase home for first time

6. inherit home from other than deceased spouse, or gift

7. situations I can't predict

SHAME

Are 140 Gold Star Wives added to the current 489,000 homestead
exemptions just too, too much of a burden for the Great State of Colorado? No, not when we can also spend many millions on family planning for undocumented immigrants.

Someday solution: redefine "qualified veteran" to include a dead one. Add the words, "or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who died in the line of duty on active service" in a new statute – one that respects and honors Gold Star Widows.

* NOTE:
1. There are two types of Gold Star Wives. First, a small number of survivors of servicemembers whose deaths were in the line of duty while on  active military service. This is the group proposed for the disabled veteran survivor property tax exemption.

2. The other group are survivors of veterans who die after active duty and whose service was 100% disabling. They are already qualified for the exemption.

Colorado's abandoned 100% disabled veterans – those rated "Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU)"

Voters approved Referendum E in 2006. We were asked whether a partial property tax exemption should be offered totally and permanently disabled veterans. We approved. But we didn't get what we voted for, not by half.

VA has two kinds of total disability awards – "TDIU" for total disability for individual unemployability, and 100% service connected permanent and total.

VA may increase certain veterans' disability compensation to the 100 percent level, even though VA has not rated their service-connected disabilities at that level. To receive the supplement, termed an Individual Unemployability (IU) payment, disabled veterans must apply for the benefit and meet two criteria. First, veterans generally must be rated between 60 percent and 90 percent disabled. Second, VA must determine that veterans' disabilities prevent them from maintaining substantially gainful employment—for instance, if their employment earnings would keep them below the poverty threshold for one person. 

Unhappily, our legislators really tightened up qualifications and locked out every single TDIU veteran. TDIU vets are carefully evaluated by VA, have at least one 60% permanent disability and a combination of factors making it physically impossible for them to work. Ever. Both vets are referred to as 100% VA disabled, but TDIU veterans have been refused the Colorado disabled veteran property tax exemption.

Consider the leeway given the legislature in the tax code. Clearly, the legislators had/have the power to follow Referendum E "in a manner that gives its words their natural and obvious significance." Must we suppose that totally and permanently disabled aren't "natural and obvious" enough words for TDIU?

Colorado Revised Statutes 2016, Title 39-3-202

TITLE 39(c) In enacting legislation to implement section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution the general assembly has attempted to interpret the provisions of section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution in a manner that gives its words their natural and obvious significance;

VA OIG 19-00227-226, Page ii, September 10, 2020

"Veterans are considered to have total disability when they have a 100 percent disability rating due to service-connected disabilities or if their service-connected disabilities make them unemployable. For the total disability to be permanent, the law requires the disability to be “based upon an impairment reasonably certain to continue throughout life."

"The Veterans Benefits Administration Inadequately Supported Permanent and Total Disability Decisions",

   

Colorado's Curious Management of its Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, & the "Unemployability" Disqualification (updated May 12, 2021)

Five years ago I wrote about the curious sleight of hand employed to sell the voters on a worthy Colorado constitutional amendment but then the enabling legislation delivered a greatly watered-down statute. 

I backed off the subject after the United Veterans Committee (now United Veterans Coalition) made clear its nonsupport at that time. Understandably, it was best to avoid conflict and not mess up the carefully-crafted UVC legislative agenda. Happily, I understand that UVC has a related bill to increase the exemption as one of the 2021 objectives. Unhappily, I feel its cost of over $19M leaves no chance of success and UVC and the bill's sponsor might instead have pushed for Gold Star Wives and/or TDIU disabled veterans.

I refer here to Referendum E from back in 2006. Our legislature generously proposed a constitutional amendment (Article X Section 3.5) to provide a small partial property tax exemption to totally disabled veterans. Note the wording: "totally disabled veterans." Let's follow that bouncing ball of how definitions of  "totally disabled veterans" kept a-changing – and to finally covered as few vets as possible:

Here is the full text of Referendum E to amend the state constitution:

"AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY.”

This is important: Note the "one hundred percent permanently disabled" and the separate phrase, "due to a service-connected disability." Here in Colorado those words are now interpreted to be one kind of totally disabled veteran but could be read to refer to two kinds. That's right. VA has two different types of totally and permanently disabled veterans. "TDIU" for total disability for individual unemployability" and 100% service connected disabled for vets with a disability, or group of disabilities when added together, equalling 100%. 

Here is how the Legislative Council told us via the Blue Book what we were voting for:

"Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong."

An overwhelming 85% of Colorado voters approved this worthy benefit for those who served our state and nation. But then the lawmakers themselves got involved and took a fire hose to the benefit, watering it down quite a bit.

When Denver finally enacted legislation for the mechanics of Article X section 3.5 to work, Referendum E ended up much less broad than what we approved. The number of qualified recipients of the benefit was cut by more than half to protect budget resources for other projects.

Here is the actual text that finally delivered Referendum E to us as law:

"(3.5) “Qualifying disabled veteran” means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department."

And next, here is the Colorado Department of Military and Veterans Affairs form for applicants, where there are two portions describing "totally disabled veterans."

"A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements
- § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S . A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements - § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S.• The veteran sustained a service-connected disability while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States. This includes members of the National Guard and Reserves who sustained their injury during a period in which they were called to active duty. • The veteran was honorably discharged.• The federal Department of Veterans Affairs has rated the veteran’s service-connected disability as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department"

– and from the back page – 

"2. DISABLED VETERAN STATUS: To qualify, both questions must be true and you must attach a copy of your VA award letter verifying that you have been given a permanent disability rating by the VA." 

CDMVA web site:

"The Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption is available to applicants who sustained a service-connected disability rated by the Federal Department of Veterans Affairs as a 100 percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the Department, the United States Department of Homeland Security, or the Department of the Army, Navy or Air Force. VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility." 

So, after all this reading, do you see where the disabled veteran property tax exemption got watered down by more than half? It was through the disqualification of veterans rated totally and permanently disabled by VA for "unemployability." Tossed into the program are the words, "VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."  Note that these TDIU people aren't veterans who are out of work, but instead vets who've been evaluated as being physically unable to ever work. And are monitored to make sure that remains the case.

Side note: the constitution included as eligible veterans those who were medically retired by their service as 100% disabled. The fourteen words describing these vets were left out of the law until 2016, when HB16-1444 brought the tax legislation into accord with the constitution.

(Here is an analysis I prepared in 2016 when I last worked on disabled veteran unemployability tax exemption issues.)

VA "unemployability" is its 100% disability rating for vets with at least one 60% service-connected issue and whose overall disabilities are so severe, so far beyond the scope for which VA assigned the 60%, that any meaningful employment is impossible. VA has other rating of "catastrophically disabled" but even when a vet is rated both unemployable and catastrophically disabled, that doesn't meet CDMVA's redefinition of Referendum E also is awarded to vets with at least a 60% service-connected disability:

"Veterans are considered to be Catastrophically Disabled when they have a severely disabling injury, disorder or disease that permanently compromises their ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The disability must be of such a degree that the Veteran requires personal or mechanical assistance to leave home or bed, or require constant supervision to avoid physical harm to themselves or others."

 Let's note that VA has two kinds of unemployability awards. The first is temporary or "IU," meant for periods of uncertainty about recovery or rehabilitation after surgery or illness, and the second is permanent (TDIU) for exactly that – permanent disability for life. TDIU veterans not only are medically determined to be unable to work, they are also carefully evaluated for that situation by the Veterans Benefit Administration before given the rating. Finally, they are carefully monitored by VA to check that they remain unable to work and both Social Security and IRS records are checked. 

Because Colorado references the VA totally disabled rating everywhere, we should look at how VA itself describes a totally disabled veteran. Read carefully and compare to Colorado's absolute disqualification of TDIU vets from the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. Here is the VA Office of Inspector General's very appropriate definition:

"Veterans are considered to have total disability when they have a 100 percent disability rating due to service-connected disabilities or if their service-connected disabilities make them unemployable. For the total disability to be permanent, the law requires the disability to be “based upon an impairment reasonably certain to continue throughout life."

"The Veterans Benefits Administration Inadequately Supported Permanent and Total Disability Decisions",

    VA OIG 19-00227-226, Page ii, September 10, 2020

Clearly,  veterans with total disability, including TDIU, is what voters thought they were approving by votes for Referendum E back in 2006. So where did the Colorado prohibition of unemployability for the benefit come from?

I asked CDMVA and they said ask DOLA. I asked DOLA and in 2014 was told "some legislators" wanted that limitation. Legislators. Not the voters. Legislators introduced (snuck in!)  their own idea of
disqualification into what voters more broadly approved as our constitutional amendment.

My view: Veterans with a 100% disability rating, including TDIU, were provided the small tax exemption via Referendum E when we voted approval. TDIU eligibility should be corrected by legislative action. I do not favor broadening the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption below the 100% disability level as the impact would be far too burdensome on taxpayers. 

Further, veterans often have disabilities common among folks their own age group, such as COPD, diabetes, hypertension and hearing loss. It would be unfair to a taxpayer with COPD to pay full property taxes while the veteran neighbor with a 50% COPD disability rating doesn't. The obvious need for tax relief is for survivors and the totally disabled veteran! Full stop.

Conclusion: A few legislators hijacked Referendum E and Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution, doing decades of harm to a large number of otherwise qualified Colorado totally disabled veterans and their survivors.

Time to set this right! What say you – Is 2022 too soon?

House Veterans Committee Disabled Military Retirees Property Tax Hearing April 25 (HB16-1444)

The legislative process begins April 25 at the Colorado Statehouse, when the House Veterans  Committee takes up HB16-1444, the bill to put military disabled retirees into the state's disabled veteran property tax laws.

Committee Chair Sue Ryden, herself a sponsor, will call the committee to order at 1:30PM, and HB16-1444 is first on the schedule.

I will be presenting the basic argument as the first witness, speaking as chair of our own C-123 Veterans Association. The United Veterans Committee of Colorado will also have me represent their 450,000 members in supporting the bill. Even the state's Division of Veterans Affairs is behind this bill!

Although the state's constitution covers both VA 100% disabled veterans and military personnel retired by their service for total disability, only VA-rated veterans were specified in the law, so the new bill aligns the constitution with the law by adding the totally disabled military retirees.

Briefing Package – Problems with Colorado's Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, & Recommended Solutions

Background & source documents

We have summed up the issues with HB07-1251, Referendum E, and Article X Section 3.5 of the Colorado Constitution...CLICK to download the complete briefing packet.

Also quite informative is the legislative history for HB07-1251. CLICK to download that 33-page resource.

Families of Troops Killed in Line-of-Duty – Denied Surviving Spouse Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

If a disabled vet isn't already in receipt if the property tax exemption, the survivor is forever forbidden this important benefit. The system is set up so that widows and widowers of troops killed in the line-of duty will never get the benefit. (click for Gold Star Families' blog on this)

How does Colorado keep troops'' widows from receiving the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption?

Colorado's "PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED DISABLED VETERAN" form explains that the widow or widower of a totally and permanently 100% service-connected veteran:

"The veteran to whom the applicant was married must have applied for and been granted the disabled veterans property tax exemption as provided by § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), C.R.S., prior to his or her death" (Colorado CMDVA Form 15-DPT-AR DV-002-07/14) 

Very clearly, CMDVA's form discourages widows from applying unless the veteran was already receiving Colorado's disabled veteran property tax exemption. This is even though no prohibition can be found in the constitution or the state's laws as regards the veteran's receipt before death.

Other confusing barriers pop up to frustrate Colorado's most disabled veterans and their survivors. Colorado's constitution spells out the exemption's qualification requirements, but as this blog has carefully detailed, legislation enacted in 2007 to accommodate Referendum E (which became Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution) didn't properly address two vital provisions in the constitution:

(1) HB07-1251 left out the constitution's provision for totally disabled military retirees, and (2)  the Division of Military Affairs added somehow a barrier to VA's Permanent and Total Individual Unemployability (TDIU.)

Vets who've been around the block with the US Department of Veterans Affairs will tell anyone asking how slow the VA is in making its disability awards. Even the simplist 100% disability rating can take years following the initial injury while on duty. Following the Gulf War, this writer was retired by the Air Force with a permanent and total 100% service connected disability military retirement effective in 1996, yet the VA 100% service connected rating didn't follow until 2015! Thus, Colorado denied its tax exemption even though the constitution clearly provides for it. Further, Colorado refused to recognize the VA's TDIU rating dating from 1998,

Were I to have died from my Gulf War injuries or at any time from 1991 until my VA rating came through in 2015, my widow would be forever denied the exemption regardless of my clear eligibility.

Colorado has been doing this to hundreds of disabled veterans' widows and widowers (Gold Star families) since 2007 when HB07-1251 was signed by the governor. For nine years, we have refused the tax exemption to survivors whose veterans were qualified by military disability retirements or TDIU VA disability ratings. Colorado also refuses it to active duty personnel who die in service because, obviously, they never were able to apply for the exemption and thus, their widows are refused.

Does this make sense, after reading the Blue Book's comprehensive description of the goal for Referendum E, or does it make sense after reading Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution? The answer should be no. CMDVA's interpretation of the statute, even though it seems in step with the constitution, has drifted far from what the electorate approved by a 78% margin in the 2006 election.

Until a more compassionate program is established, this year's' military widows will join the ranks of those between 2007 and 2016 in being refused this vital, well-earned benefit.

WHAT VOTERS APPROVED IN 2006 FOR DISABLED VETERAN PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

BUT WE DIDN'T GET IT!

Code of Federal Regulations on Unemployability

Following is the Code of Federal Regulations governance of VA unemployability ratings. Note that VA considers Permanent and Total Unemployability awards (TDIU) to be "a rating of 100 percent service-connected disability based on individual unemployability"

§3.340   Total and permanent total ratings and unemployability.

(a) Total disability ratings—(1) General. Total disability will be considered to exist when there is present any impairment of mind or body which is sufficient to render it impossible for the average person to follow a substantially gainful occupation. Total disability may or may not be permanent. Total ratings will not be assigned, generally, for temporary exacerbations or acute infectious diseases except where specifically prescribed by the schedule.

(2) Schedule for rating disabilities. Total ratings are authorized for any disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities prescribes a 100 percent evaluation or, with less disability, where the requirements of paragraph 16, page 5 of the rating schedule are present or where, in pension cases, the requirements of paragraph 17, page 5 of the schedule are met.

(3) Ratings of total disability on history. In the case of disabilities which have undergone some recent improvement, a rating of total disability may be made, provided:

(i) That the disability must in the past have been of sufficient severity to warrant a total disability rating;

(ii) That it must have required extended, continuous, or intermittent hospitalization, or have produced total industrial incapacity for at least 1 year, or be subject to recurring, severe, frequent, or prolonged exacerbations; and

(iii) That it must be the opinion of the rating agency that despite the recent improvement of the physical condition, the veteran will be unable to effect an adjustment into a substantially gainful occupation. Due consideration will be given to the frequency and duration of totally incapacitating exacerbations since incurrence of the original disease or injury, and to periods of hospitalization for treatment in determining whether the average person could have reestablished himself or herself in a substantially gainful occupation.

(b) Permanent total disability. Permanence of total disability will be taken to exist when such impairment is reasonably certain to continue throughout the life of the disabled person. The permanent loss or loss of use of both hands, or of both feet, or of one hand and one foot, or of the sight of both eyes, or becoming permanently helpless or bedridden constitutes permanent total disability. Diseases and injuries of long standing which are actually totally incapacitating will be regarded as permanently and totally disabling when the probability of permanent improvement under treatment is remote. Permanent total disability ratings may not be granted as a result of any incapacity from acute infectious disease, accident, or injury, unless there is present one of the recognized combinations or permanent loss of use of extremities or sight, or the person is in the strict sense permanently helpless or bedridden, or when it is reasonably certain that a subsidence of the acute or temporary symptoms will be followed by irreducible totality of disability by way of residuals. The age of the disabled person may be considered in determining permanence.

(c) Insurance ratings. A rating of permanent and total disability for insurance purposes will have no effect on ratings for compensation or pension.

[26 FR 1585, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981]

§3.341   Total disability ratings for compensation purposes.

(a) General. Subject to the limitation in paragraph (b) of this section, total-disability compensation ratings may be assigned under the provisions of §3.340. However, if the total rating is based on a disability or combination of disabilities for which the Schedule for Rating Disabilities provides an evaluation of less than 100 percent, it must be determined that the service-connected disabilities are sufficient to produce unemployability without regard to advancing age.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)

(b) Incarcerated veterans. A total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability which would first become effective while a veteran is incarcerated in a Federal, State or local penal institution for conviction of a felony, shall not be assigned during such period of incarceration. However, where a rating for individual unemployability exists prior to incarceration for a felony and routine review is required, the case will be reconsidered to determine if continued eligibility for such rating exists.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5313(c))

(c) Program for vocational rehabilitation. Each time a veteran is rated totally disabled on the basis of individual unemployability during the period beginning after January 31, 1985, the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service will be notified so that an evaluation may be offered to determine whether the achievement of a vocational goal by the veteran is reasonably feasible.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163)

[46 FR 47541, Sept. 29, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 52774, Dec. 26, 1985; 55 FR 17271, Apr. 24, 1990l; 58 FR 32445, June 10, 1993; 68 FR 34542, June 10, 2003]

VA Statement re: Permanent & Total Service-Connected Unemployability Ratings & "Unemployability"

In response to my inquiry, VA's Senior Management and Program Analyst at Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs emailed me the following confirmation that VA's details for permanent and total individual unemployability are worded the same as Colorado's constitution, at least, that's how the federal government reads their program and Colorado's statute.

The gentleman's name is obscured here but has been provided to CODVA authorities.

Readers here are reminded that the constitution holds that Colorado will go by ratings of the US Department of Veterans Affairs regarding eligibility for the property tax exemption, which reads: "BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT  OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT,"

Sxxxxxxx, Exxx, VBAVACO                      Feb 8
to me, Ben, David, Linda

We’d be happy to answer any questions Mr. Mestas and CO DVA have.  As I mentioned in my previous response, VA does consider some IU ratings, such as the one you provided as an example, to be permanent and total (P&T).  P&T IU ratings are clearly marked as such. 

Ex.. 

However, this VA opinion and the clear, very plain language in the law have proved immaterial to CODA officials. These unelected staffers simply inserted their own interpretation of Colorado's constitutional amendment and are determined to block many fully eligible veterans and their survivors now classified by VA as "permanent and total" via unemployability.

BTW, "unemployability" to VA is based solely on line of duty illnesses or injuries, and on VA's careful assessment only of the veteran's service-connected issues as being completely, totally, permanently disabling for life, and to total 100& in the overall appraisal of the veteran.

Some Legislative History of the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

The problem: Colorado's voters defined "qualified disabled veteran via a Constitutional amendment (Referendum E). Presently the Colorado Division of Veterans Affairs unfairly excludes from the benefit qualified veterans with permanent "unemployability" VA awards, and also excludes veterans directly retired by the military services per permanent and total disability.

Military disability retired property tax relief for Colorado's totally disabled military veterans is based on the 2006 amendment to the state Constitution. The wording of the title of Referendum E is inclusive of any "United States Military veteran who is 100% permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability." 

Nowhere in the Constitution nor other legislation does the "unemployability"appear. It was added as an exemption only by extra-legal preference of the CDMVA, contrary to the Constitution.

Here is the full title, approved by the voters:

AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY Here's the text of Referendum E's definition of "disabled veteran:"

(1.5) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DISABLED VETERAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SERVED ON ACTIVE DUTY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE COLORADO NATIONAL yGUARD WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED INTO THE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, HAS BEEN SEPARATED THEREFROM UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS, AND HAS ESTABLISHED A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY THAT HAS BEEN RATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT DISABILITY THROUGH DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS OR A PENSION PURSUANT TO A LAW OR REGULATION ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, OR HOMELAND SECURITY. 

(note: There is a minor conflict between the referendum's pension language and its requirement that disabilities be service-connected – the VA pension program is based on low-income and need, not service-connected disabilities. There is no such thing as 100% service-connected disability pensions.)

The 2007 Legislature "fine tuned" Section 3.5 of Article X from the 2006 Constitutional amendment. It bypassed the voter-approved "any veteran," dropped the pension, but  very improperly redefined and restricted the definition of "qualifying veteran" by failure to adhere to the broad and inclusive language of the voter-approved referendum.

"(3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department. "

The 2007 Legislature errored in its modification of the definition of "qualifying veteran" away from that approved by the electorate and per the Constitution. This amounted to an ex post facto law depriving many formerly qualified disabled veterans from the Constitution's protection regarding property tax. Further, this violates the US Constitution by depriving the affected veterans of their property (the tax benefit) without due process. From the Colorado Constitution's Bill of Rights:

"Section 11. Ex post facto laws. No ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."

The "Unemployability" TDIU estriction on Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, Overturning Voters' Constitutional Amendment

Wording on Colorado counties' disabled veteran property tax exemption forms:

The 2007 enabling legislation forces CMDVA to a somewhat restricted eligibility compared to the broader constitution's provisions::

"An individual who sustained a service-connected disability that has been rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as 100% “permanent and total.” VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."

Readers will please note that the word "unemployability" appears only on county forms and various state brochures describing the disabled veteran property tax program: nowhere does that exclusion exist in the law! It was simply added by CDMVA acting on legislative input.