THE BIG PROBLEM: How to pay for TDIU Vets Getting the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

 There's no getting around the biggest obstacle to any Colorado veterans benefit – just where the heck do we get the money to pay for it?

In Colorado's state house that is the Number One question on every bill. Trying to get the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption to cover VA 100% permanent Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) vets will be no different. 

I don't know the necessary procedures but will float a couple ideas here. First, the goal is to get the exemption for approximately 4622 veterans now rated 100% disabled TDIU by the VA. That's approximately $2.6 million added to the overall Homestead Exemption program costing over $159 million. 

Currently, veterans and their survivors are only 2% of that total with the exemption restricted to VA 100% schedular vets, so adding TDIU will make veterans just under 4% of the program. The number of vets that I use already considers the fact that 13.3% are also able to claim the senior exemption, and already factors in the point that 80% of all the Colorado TDIU vets own homes to exempt. Finally, the average value of each exemption is considered, leaving the goal at $2.6 million.

The Legislature needs to appreciate that voters already approved every 100% disabled veteran for the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. The wording of Referendum E in 2006 was very clear, as was the explanation in the Blue Book. It was the legislators, not the voters, who opted with the enabling legislation for Article X Section 3.5 to invent the unemployability barrier. We need to.get our tax laws back into line with the state constitution!

– POSSIBILITIES –

1. Cut the average veteran and survivor exemption benefit in half to stretch the present funding to include TDIU recipients. The Legislature already has the power to do this per Article X Section 3.5 of the state constitution

2.  Likewise, reduce the benefit to each senior homestead exemption to capture $2.6M. This would be a much less severe reduction for the recipients than #1 above, approximately 0.02 for about just $11 less per year per exemption

3. Divert a portion of the funds CDMVA now uses for grants

3.  Add an optional $5 contribution to each state income tax return

4. Divert $2.6M from Colorado Economic Development Commission

5. Ideas??

DRAFT 2022 BILL EXTENDING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION TO "Gold Star Spouses," SURVIVORS OF ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY

This is just an untutored amateur's rough draft following the legislation guide  of a bill that might work to qualify Gold Star Wives for the property tax exemption by legislation instead of a constitutional amendment. Otherwise, an amendment would take a super-majority of the legislature to recommend to the voters.

            

                                                  A BILL FOR AN ACT

CONCERNING THE DISABLED VETERAN SURVIVOR PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ESTABLISH QUALIFICATION OF A SURVIVING SPOUSE OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCIES, BY EXTENDING THE DEFINITION OF “OWNER-OCCUPIER PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED FOR A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION”

________________________________________________________                                                                

                                                               Bill Summary

(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

Colorado provides the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption to a survivor of a totally disabled veteran “previously qualified for a property tax exemption,” per § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), Colorado Revised Statutes. The requirement that the veteran be in receipt of the exemption at the time of death necessarily denies the exemption to the survivor of an active-duty servicemember whose death was in the line of duty. Survivors of Colorado National Guard servicemembers whose death was in the line of duty while activated for state contingencies are also denied the exemption. This is contrary to the clear intent of the 2006 Referendum E in which voters approved the exemption to “one hundred percent permanently disabled due to a service-connected disability,” a line of duty death also being, in effect, a total and permanent disability.

This bill extends the definition of “owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption” to include servicemembers whose death was in the line of duty while in the Armed Forces of the United States or in the Colorado National Guard while activated for state contingencies, thereby qualifying those surviving spouses for the same property tax exemption as the surviving spouse of a previously qualified disabled veteran.

_________________________________________________________

 

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-3-203, amend (11) as follows:

The owner-occupier is the surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under subparagraph (I) of this paragraph, ONLY FOR PURPOSES OF § 39-3-203(1.5)(a), COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, THE SURVIVING SPOUSE WHO HAS NOT REMARRIED OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCY;” and

(b) The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205 and the circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application.  Under no circumstances shall an exemption be allowed for property taxes assessed during any property tax year prior to the year in which an owner-occupier first files an exemption application.

(1.5)(a) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is a qualifying disabled veteran shall be exempt from taxation if:

(I) The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205 ;  and

(II) The circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application.

(a.5) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2015, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is the surviving spouse of a qualifying disabled veteran who previously received an exemption under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5)  OR SURVIVING SPOUSE WHO HAS NOT REMARRIED OF A SERVICEMEMBER WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OR IN THE COLORADO NATIONAL GUARD WHEN ACTIVATED FOR STATE CONTINGENCY, is exempt from taxation. 

SECTION 2.. In Colorado Revised Statutes Title 8. Labor and Industry § 8-14.3-202. Definitions, amend (8) as follows:

“Veteran” means a person who actively served in the United States armed forces and WHO IS MISSING IN ACTION OR WHOSE DEATH WAS IN THE LINE OF DUTY or who was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable, in accordance with U.S.C. title 38, as amended.  “Veteran” includes a person serving or who served in the National Guard or as a reservist

BREAK - --WHAT ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS ARE NEEDED HERE?--BREAK

SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 5, 2022, if adjournment sine die is on May 6, 2022)

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

INFO:

EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE  APPLICATION:

1. MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OR EVIDENCE OF CIVIL UNION

2. DEATH CERTIFICATE, OR VA OR DOD STATEMENT 

3. EVIDENCE OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BY SERVICEMEMBER OR SPOUSE

4. COMPLETED APPLICATION

NOTE: survivors of active duty servicemembers separated for total disability or rated by VA as 100 per cent permanently and totally disabled and who then die are already eligible for the exemption.

Helpful advice – and a word of caution

For some years I've advocated for Gold Star Wives receiving the same property tax exemption provided survivors of our totally disabled veterans. I've been feeling somewhat better and picked up some steam and got onto the bandwagon (I treasure mixed metaphors) to plow ahead to get some interest among others. 

That hasn't gone so well. Not only is it a difficult sell in a state economy battered by Covid, it is also just one concern among so many affecting veterans and our families. Fortunately, we in Colorado have our United Veterans Coalition to bring to bear 460,000 veterans' voices for legislators to hear,

The UVC does its job well. Their decades-long track record is proof.  The inclusion of a multitude of our largest and smallest veterans' organizations is another proof of the trust placed in UVC by us as veterans. One voice, 460,000 addressing agreed-upon legislative objectives.

But things can still be difficult. I've been concerned about bringing the issue up with the veterans' groups and my elected representatives, hoping for inclusion of Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in the UVC 2022 legislative agenda. That's been hard, with less enthusiasm that I'd expected, and also hard because UVC has its well-established way of doing things. I knew little about UVC objectives and how to get UVC support, but when I asked for updates to information given me in 2019 before starting these current efforts my emails and calls went unanswered. Of course, nobody owes me any response at all - we're all volunteers in these veterans' projects.

You know the phrase: "Lead, follow or get out of the way!" In the vacuum of responses to my inquiries, I found nobody to follow and so I started seeking interest from others. The basic step was clearly getting UVC "primary members" behind what would have to be the unanimous coalition approval. Although I certainly have no attitude about "get out of the way," I didn't grasp the friction that my trodding on others' turf would cause as I reached out to primary coalition members.

So doing what I've been doing hasn't gone too well with UVC and what they're doing. Their opposition to my concerns about Gold Star Wives (I'm a Gold Star Family Member) is perfectly understandable because they are the experienced lobbyists, chosen for their dedication and successes.  GSW wasn't an objective in 2014, 2015, (it was an objective in 2016 as I asked), 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 or 2022. They've mentioned to others that my urging for it to be a 2022 objective wasn't well-received.

I've appreciated their two emails of useful guidance after I directly asked them, " I guess I should just ask outright, should efforts on Gold Star Wives stop altogether? "

Okay. Hand gently patted and pushed away from the throttle. I take it the coalition's suggestion is to "follow the UVC legislative committee updates" to see if action happens to develop among member organizations before coalition approval in November Gold Star Wives' taxation. Also, the gentle inference is that approaching my legislators for interest in their help next year, and approaching groups like the Legion or Colorado National Guard wasn't helpful or welcome, thus the guidance instead of encouragement or advice to do ... anything.

Darn. I'd hoped, expected even, some hand-holding. Some guidance and encouragement. Referring back to their email of sixteen months ago was interesting, and the point was that I should have remembered it and been compliant with it. I guess I was influenced most by our leadership's 16 Nov 2016 instruction:

 "it is crucial that each of you reach out to your own State Senator and  Representative, and at least let him/her know that you are part of the UVC, and talk about how important it is that we support our veterans,

Oh, well.  Lesson learned about playing nice with others.

Equal Treatment for Colorado Gold Star Wives!

 

Colorado's Curious Management of its Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption, & the "Unemployability" Disqualification (updated May 12, 2021)

Five years ago I wrote about the curious sleight of hand employed to sell the voters on a worthy Colorado constitutional amendment but then the enabling legislation delivered a greatly watered-down statute. 

I backed off the subject after the United Veterans Committee (now United Veterans Coalition) made clear its nonsupport at that time. Understandably, it was best to avoid conflict and not mess up the carefully-crafted UVC legislative agenda. Happily, I understand that UVC has a related bill to increase the exemption as one of the 2021 objectives. Unhappily, I feel its cost of over $19M leaves no chance of success and UVC and the bill's sponsor might instead have pushed for Gold Star Wives and/or TDIU disabled veterans.

I refer here to Referendum E from back in 2006. Our legislature generously proposed a constitutional amendment (Article X Section 3.5) to provide a small partial property tax exemption to totally disabled veterans. Note the wording: "totally disabled veterans." Let's follow that bouncing ball of how definitions of  "totally disabled veterans" kept a-changing – and to finally covered as few vets as possible:

Here is the full text of Referendum E to amend the state constitution:

"AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 OF ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENTLY DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY.”

This is important: Note the "one hundred percent permanently disabled" and the separate phrase, "due to a service-connected disability." Here in Colorado those words are now interpreted to be one kind of totally disabled veteran but could be read to refer to two kinds. That's right. VA has two different types of totally and permanently disabled veterans. "TDIU" for total disability for individual unemployability" and 100% service connected disabled for vets with a disability, or group of disabilities when added together, equalling 100%. 

Here is how the Legislative Council told us via the Blue Book what we were voting for:

"Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong."

An overwhelming 85% of Colorado voters approved this worthy benefit for those who served our state and nation. But then the lawmakers themselves got involved and took a fire hose to the benefit, watering it down quite a bit.

When Denver finally enacted legislation for the mechanics of Article X section 3.5 to work, Referendum E ended up much less broad than what we approved. The number of qualified recipients of the benefit was cut by more than half to protect budget resources for other projects.

Here is the actual text that finally delivered Referendum E to us as law:

"(3.5) “Qualifying disabled veteran” means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department."

And next, here is the Colorado Department of Military and Veterans Affairs form for applicants, where there are two portions describing "totally disabled veterans."

"A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements
- § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S . A “qualifying disabled veteran” is a person who meets each of the following requirements - § 39-3-202(3.5), C.R.S.• The veteran sustained a service-connected disability while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States. This includes members of the National Guard and Reserves who sustained their injury during a period in which they were called to active duty. • The veteran was honorably discharged.• The federal Department of Veterans Affairs has rated the veteran’s service-connected disability as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department"

– and from the back page – 

"2. DISABLED VETERAN STATUS: To qualify, both questions must be true and you must attach a copy of your VA award letter verifying that you have been given a permanent disability rating by the VA." 

CDMVA web site:

"The Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption is available to applicants who sustained a service-connected disability rated by the Federal Department of Veterans Affairs as a 100 percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the Department, the United States Department of Homeland Security, or the Department of the Army, Navy or Air Force. VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility." 

So, after all this reading, do you see where the disabled veteran property tax exemption got watered down by more than half? It was through the disqualification of veterans rated totally and permanently disabled by VA for "unemployability." Tossed into the program are the words, "VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant’s eligibility."  Note that these TDIU people aren't veterans who are out of work, but instead vets who've been evaluated as being physically unable to ever work. And are monitored to make sure that remains the case.

Side note: the constitution included as eligible veterans those who were medically retired by their service as 100% disabled. The fourteen words describing these vets were left out of the law until 2016, when HB16-1444 brought the tax legislation into accord with the constitution.

(Here is an analysis I prepared in 2016 when I last worked on disabled veteran unemployability tax exemption issues.)

VA "unemployability" is its 100% disability rating for vets with at least one 60% service-connected issue and whose overall disabilities are so severe, so far beyond the scope for which VA assigned the 60%, that any meaningful employment is impossible. VA has other rating of "catastrophically disabled" but even when a vet is rated both unemployable and catastrophically disabled, that doesn't meet CDMVA's redefinition of Referendum E also is awarded to vets with at least a 60% service-connected disability:

"Veterans are considered to be Catastrophically Disabled when they have a severely disabling injury, disorder or disease that permanently compromises their ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The disability must be of such a degree that the Veteran requires personal or mechanical assistance to leave home or bed, or require constant supervision to avoid physical harm to themselves or others."

 Let's note that VA has two kinds of unemployability awards. The first is temporary or "IU," meant for periods of uncertainty about recovery or rehabilitation after surgery or illness, and the second is permanent (TDIU) for exactly that – permanent disability for life. TDIU veterans not only are medically determined to be unable to work, they are also carefully evaluated for that situation by the Veterans Benefit Administration before given the rating. Finally, they are carefully monitored by VA to check that they remain unable to work and both Social Security and IRS records are checked. 

Because Colorado references the VA totally disabled rating everywhere, we should look at how VA itself describes a totally disabled veteran. Read carefully and compare to Colorado's absolute disqualification of TDIU vets from the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption. Here is the VA Office of Inspector General's very appropriate definition:

"Veterans are considered to have total disability when they have a 100 percent disability rating due to service-connected disabilities or if their service-connected disabilities make them unemployable. For the total disability to be permanent, the law requires the disability to be “based upon an impairment reasonably certain to continue throughout life."

"The Veterans Benefits Administration Inadequately Supported Permanent and Total Disability Decisions",

    VA OIG 19-00227-226, Page ii, September 10, 2020

Clearly,  veterans with total disability, including TDIU, is what voters thought they were approving by votes for Referendum E back in 2006. So where did the Colorado prohibition of unemployability for the benefit come from?

I asked CDMVA and they said ask DOLA. I asked DOLA and in 2014 was told "some legislators" wanted that limitation. Legislators. Not the voters. Legislators introduced (snuck in!)  their own idea of
disqualification into what voters more broadly approved as our constitutional amendment.

My view: Veterans with a 100% disability rating, including TDIU, were provided the small tax exemption via Referendum E when we voted approval. TDIU eligibility should be corrected by legislative action. I do not favor broadening the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption below the 100% disability level as the impact would be far too burdensome on taxpayers. 

Further, veterans often have disabilities common among folks their own age group, such as COPD, diabetes, hypertension and hearing loss. It would be unfair to a taxpayer with COPD to pay full property taxes while the veteran neighbor with a 50% COPD disability rating doesn't. The obvious need for tax relief is for survivors and the totally disabled veteran! Full stop.

Conclusion: A few legislators hijacked Referendum E and Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution, doing decades of harm to a large number of otherwise qualified Colorado totally disabled veterans and their survivors.

Time to set this right! What say you – Is 2022 too soon?

Scan our QR code for the Gold Star Wives briefing packet

Gold Star Wives Poster - Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

Correct! It seems our state legislature simply didn't contemplate the possibility of Colorado soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines dying on active duty. That's why Colorado seem to have forgotten to offer our Gold Star Wives the same widows' benefits as we provide to survivors of totally disabled veterans.

That's unjust and plain WRONG! But not a single widow of an active duty service member is permitted the Colorado Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption, a small exemption saving widows between $400-$600 a year.

Why? Our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5 permits the exemption only to widows of disabled veterans already in receipt of the benefit. Dying on Active Duty means not being able to complete the application process – because the service member died first!

This is Really an Amazing and Ridiculous Catch-22!

Why is the small property tax exemption of value to Gold Star Wives?

First, it shows the state's respect and appreciation for the loss borne by these widows and widowers. The partial tax exemption would only save about $400 to $600. It would seem a minor issue to most of us. 

But look at this from a Gold Star Widow's perspective. Circumstances vary, but if eligible widows can receive half of the service member's base pay. More than half of all military deaths are E-5 and below. An Army E-5 three-stripe sergeant would have a widow pension of under $2,000 per month.

The VA has "Dependents Indemnity Compensation," where if eligible a survivor might receive $1,300 per month. So, at best, our late sergeant's widow (or widower) hopes for a modest $39,000 per year.

How far does that go? In Colorado, the average home mortgage cost is $1,700 per month, and with typical associated costs like taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance, a monthly cost of over $2,400 or $28,000 annually. You can do the math – that leaves $916 per month for food, transportation, insurance, clothing. 

Summary: Colorado Life did a thorough report on the money necessary to live in Colorado one needs $4,317.68 per month to live in Colorado if there is a mortgage involved. Oops – that leaves our widow short by over $12,000 per year. That's why the paltry $400-$600 partial property tax exemption is important. 

The burden of property tax is a huge reason so many citizens can never afford a home, and that's even more true for military folks. That's why so few junior military own homes at the time of death and why so few widows are affected by this proposed tax exemption.

For me, I wish it was a total tax exemption as many states provide! The survivor of a service member who dies on active duty obviously have to make many, many compromises to live on $12,000 less per year than what "average" citizens need.

I think I'll do a poster based on the graphic above, but try to get the word count reduced.

"UNEMPLOYABILITY" - How did it pop up as a disqualification for Colorado's Disabled Property Tax Exemption?

Back in 2006 Colorado voters amended our constitution to provide a partial property tax exemption (a small one, about $480 on average) for totally disabled military veterans. This is now Article X Section 3.5 of the constitution and §39-3-202(2) C.R.S of our statutes. The 2006 Blue Book explained that federal VA ratings would be the standard followed for veterans to qualify. 

The VA has only two such ratings. 

One is for injuries that are so severe the veteran is made 100% disabled. The other is for injuries that are severe but even worse than the percentage of disability VA rules allow for that particular injury or illness, and which by themselves (only military issues) make the veteran unable to work for the remainder of his/her lifetime...that rating is termed IN THE LAW as, "Total Disability Individual Unemployability" (TDIU.) BOTH of these VA ratings are for ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PERMANENT AND TOTAL DISABILITY. 

Colorado has a problem in that for some reason outside the law, the state opted to refuse the exemption to veterans having the VA TDIU rating.  Although state agencies refuse to accept TDIU or unemployability, that refusal isn't in the constitution, the legislation or the 2006 Referendum E, for which the Blue Book specifically referenced totally disabled veterans unable to work for their remaining lifetime.

It seems the only mention of unemployability is in the instructions and web pages saying it is unacceptable...only in the forms for the final implementation of the referendum, the constitutional amendment, and the legislation does unemployability get mentioned as a disqualifier. Unemployability, one of the two VA ratings for total and permanent military service disability is simply (and wrongly) excluded.

That's wrong. It needs correction, and we call on DMVA and DOLA to make implementation of this constitutional benefit properly reflect the constitution. VA's rating of veterans should be respected as detailed in the law. ALL veterans rated totally and permanently disabled, including via the TDIU rating, should be afforded this modest property tax exemption.

Here's what the law says are our totally disabled veterans entitled to the partial tax exemption:

Colorado 39-3-202 C.R.S.

 “(3.5) ‘Qualifying disabled veteran’ means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the United States departments of homeland security, Army, Navy, or Air Force.”

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY & VETERAN AFFAIRS

Property Tax: Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

This program is for Disabled Veterans who:

• Are RATED by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at 100%, Permanently and Totally Disabled by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Individual Unacceptability(?*) does not qualify) AND

• You must have owned and occupied the property since January 1st of the year in which the Veteran is applying. (*unacceptability is DMVA's typo, not mine!)

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

“Requirements for Eligibility, Veterans

• Applicant must be a disabled veteran who has been rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as permanently disabled. (VA unemployability awards do not meet the requirement for determining an applicant's eligibility.)”

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS, Qualifying Disabled Veteran:

To qualify, a disabled veteran must meet each of the following requirements: 

• Served active duty in U.S. armed forces.

•  Was honorably discharged.

• Sustained a service-connected disability rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as 100% permanent and total.  Disabilities rated less than 100% and VA employability awards do not meet the eligibility requirements.

BUT WAIT: THERE'S MORE!
There's another problem with the way Colorado implements this constitutional benefit and its enabling legislation. They simply haven't gotten around to it.

The constitution also recognized servicemembers that the military retires as totally and permanently disabled. Through an oversight, these disabled veterans were simply not mentioned in the statutes and were therefore refused the exemption even though it was a constitutional right, spelled out crystal clear, word for word:

"...through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the United States departments of homeland security, or the departments of Army, Navy, or Air Force.”

In May 2015 the governor signed an act unanimously approved by both houses of the legislature in May 2016 to correct the problem by placing those last fifteen words in the constitution also in the law. For some reason the correction hasn't been implemented by the responsible state agencies...it has simply been ignored. Totally disabled military retirees continue to be taxed and the constitution abused. 

When I've tried to discuss this disconnect with officials there's been no disagreement about the issue, but it doesn't seem a big deal to anyone.

This is a big deal! The people of the state are the supreme power, and the constitution reflects the will of the people, with state officials from the governor on down sworn to protect and defend it. A right specifically guaranteed by our state constitution cannot simply be ignored by agencies that didn't get around to honoring it. You may recall that in 1776 unfair taxation led to some disagreement between England and her American colonies. 

Thankfully, officials have indicated that things will be set right by January 2018, ending eleven years of unconstitutional taxation of this group of totally disabled military retirees. By January, these veterans will have been unconstitutionally overtaxed about $4,800 each.