Colorado proudly honors survivors of our totally disabled veterans...thousands of them, but ignores 140 equally worthy Gold Star Wives |
Colorado recognizes sacrifices of our totally disabled veterans, awarding a partial property tax exemption to 100 percent totally and permanently disabled veterans. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has two types of 100% disabled veterans – (1) vets with a 100% disability (2) vets with a total disability rated “Total Disability for Individual Unemployability” (TDIU.) VA benefits for the two types are identical, but Colorado’s TDIU veterans are unfairly denied the exemption
Saturday, June 12, 2021
Gold Star Wives Are Due the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption
Friday, May 7, 2021
Helpful advice – and a word of caution
For some years I've advocated for Gold Star Wives receiving the same property tax exemption provided survivors of our totally disabled veterans. I've been feeling somewhat better and picked up some steam and got onto the bandwagon (I treasure mixed metaphors) to plow ahead to get some interest among others.
That hasn't gone so well. Not only is it a difficult sell in a state economy battered by Covid, it is also just one concern among so many affecting veterans and our families. Fortunately, we in Colorado have our United Veterans Coalition to bring to bear 460,000 veterans' voices for legislators to hear,
The UVC does its job well. Their decades-long track record is proof. The inclusion of a multitude of our largest and smallest veterans' organizations is another proof of the trust placed in UVC by us as veterans. One voice, 460,000 addressing agreed-upon legislative objectives.
But things can still be difficult. I've been concerned about bringing the issue up with the veterans' groups and my elected representatives, hoping for inclusion of Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in the UVC 2022 legislative agenda. That's been hard, with less enthusiasm that I'd expected, and also hard because UVC has its well-established way of doing things. I knew little about UVC objectives and how to get UVC support, but when I asked for updates to information given me in 2019 before starting these current efforts my emails and calls went unanswered. Of course, nobody owes me any response at all - we're all volunteers in these veterans' projects.
You know the phrase: "Lead, follow or get out of the way!" In the vacuum of responses to my inquiries, I found nobody to follow and so I started seeking interest from others. The basic step was clearly getting UVC "primary members" behind what would have to be the unanimous coalition approval. Although I certainly have no attitude about "get out of the way," I didn't grasp the friction that my trodding on others' turf would cause as I reached out to primary coalition members.
So doing what I've been doing hasn't gone too well with UVC and what they're doing. Their opposition to my concerns about Gold Star Wives (I'm a Gold Star Family Member) is perfectly understandable because they are the experienced lobbyists, chosen for their dedication and successes. GSW wasn't an objective in 2014, 2015, (it was an objective in 2016 as I asked), 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 or 2022. They've mentioned to others that my urging for it to be a 2022 objective wasn't well-received.
I've appreciated their two emails of useful guidance after I directly asked them, " I guess I should just ask outright, should efforts on Gold Star Wives stop altogether? "
Okay. Hand gently patted and pushed away from the throttle. I take it the coalition's suggestion is to "follow the UVC legislative committee updates" to see if action happens to develop among member organizations before coalition approval in November Gold Star Wives' taxation. Also, the gentle inference is that approaching my legislators for interest in their help next year, and approaching groups like the Legion or Colorado National Guard wasn't helpful or welcome, thus the guidance instead of encouragement or advice to do ... anything.
Darn. I'd hoped, expected even, some hand-holding. Some guidance and encouragement. Referring back to their email of sixteen months ago was interesting, and the point was that I should have remembered it and been compliant with it. I guess I was influenced most by our leadership's 16 Nov 2016 instruction:"it is crucial that each of you reach out to your own State Senator and Representative, and at least let him/her know that you are part of the UVC, and talk about how important it is that we support our veterans,
Oh, well. Lesson learned about playing nice with others.
Sunday, May 2, 2021
SAMPLE MESSGE TO COLORADO STATE LEGISLATORS FOR GOLD STAR WIVES' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION
Here are the names of Colorado's 35 senators and state's 65 representatives.
"In the spirit of the Assembly of the State of Colorado Senate Joint Resolution 21-010s, issued April 5, 2021 in honor of Gold Star Families, I strongly urge in 2022 much more substantive respect be shown Gold Star Wives with your support of 150 survivors whose spouses died on active military service.
As the needs of Colorado and its citizens form the 2022 legislative agenda, please support their inclusion in the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption. The only reason they are denied the benefit is that their spouses died on active military service. Only the line-of-duty death of their military spouse disqualifies Gold Star Wives from the same modest state benefit extended to survivors of our totally disabled veterans.Language in Article X Section 3.5 (1)(b) of the Colorado Constitution provides for survivors of totally disabled veterans and of the Senior Homestead Exemption. Illogically, the phrasing completely disqualifies survivors whose active-duty military spouses lost on active duty. Article X Section 3.5 (1)(b) reads, in part:
(b) The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsectionIn 2014, HB 14-1373 dealt more directly with homesteaders' survivors, providing for "the surviving spouse who takes possession of the qualifying residence of a deceased." Again, active duty troops' survivors were disqualified unless the family owned a Colorado home when the military spouse died – most military families, especially the young and junior ranks, do not own homes. Personal income and the frequent necessity of their transfers often makes home ownership illogical except as they near retirement.The language of HB 14-1373 also worked against the hopes of survivors stationed out of Colorado but hope to return or establish residence here.Colorado denies the exemption to survivors of active-duty military because their spouses died. Those servicemembers will never come home as disabled veterans, alive to be "previously qualified" for the exemption for which they never had the chance to apply.They died instead of being injured. Benefit denied the surviving spouse. This is a too-gruesome "Catch-22".It is also an illogical distinction between active duty troops' survivors and veterans' survivors. Perhaps our legislators did not intend to disqualify military survivors, but did they overlook the fact that not every soldier, sailor, airman or Marine will be coming home alive? Did they overlook the fact that America has been at war for the last two decades?LSC estimates a total only 150 widows and widowers, survivors of active duty servicemembers. The state's homestead exemption benefits over a quarter million Colorado homeowners and their survivors.
Gold Star Wives are just 0.0006% of that population. LCS says coverage for them would under $100,000 with negligible administrative overhead. Hardly an insurmountable hurdle for Colorado!
Perhaps today's wiser Legislature needs to include the death of an active-duty servicemember in its definition of "disabled veteran."