Helpful advice – and a word of caution

For some years I've advocated for Gold Star Wives receiving the same property tax exemption provided survivors of our totally disabled veterans. I've been feeling somewhat better and picked up some steam and got onto the bandwagon (I treasure mixed metaphors) to plow ahead to get some interest among others. 

That hasn't gone so well. Not only is it a difficult sell in a state economy battered by Covid, it is also just one concern among so many affecting veterans and our families. Fortunately, we in Colorado have our United Veterans Coalition to bring to bear 460,000 veterans' voices for legislators to hear,

The UVC does its job well. Their decades-long track record is proof.  The inclusion of a multitude of our largest and smallest veterans' organizations is another proof of the trust placed in UVC by us as veterans. One voice, 460,000 addressing agreed-upon legislative objectives.

But things can still be difficult. I've been concerned about bringing the issue up with the veterans' groups and my elected representatives, hoping for inclusion of Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption in the UVC 2022 legislative agenda. That's been hard, with less enthusiasm that I'd expected, and also hard because UVC has its well-established way of doing things. I knew little about UVC objectives and how to get UVC support, but when I asked for updates to information given me in 2019 before starting these current efforts my emails and calls went unanswered. Of course, nobody owes me any response at all - we're all volunteers in these veterans' projects.

You know the phrase: "Lead, follow or get out of the way!" In the vacuum of responses to my inquiries, I found nobody to follow and so I started seeking interest from others. The basic step was clearly getting UVC "primary members" behind what would have to be the unanimous coalition approval. Although I certainly have no attitude about "get out of the way," I didn't grasp the friction that my trodding on others' turf would cause as I reached out to primary coalition members.

So doing what I've been doing hasn't gone too well with UVC and what they're doing. Their opposition to my concerns about Gold Star Wives (I'm a Gold Star Family Member) is perfectly understandable because they are the experienced lobbyists, chosen for their dedication and successes.  GSW wasn't an objective in 2014, 2015, (it was an objective in 2016 as I asked), 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 or 2022. They've mentioned to others that my urging for it to be a 2022 objective wasn't well-received.

I've appreciated their two emails of useful guidance after I directly asked them, " I guess I should just ask outright, should efforts on Gold Star Wives stop altogether? "

Okay. Hand gently patted and pushed away from the throttle. I take it the coalition's suggestion is to "follow the UVC legislative committee updates" to see if action happens to develop among member organizations before coalition approval in November Gold Star Wives' taxation. Also, the gentle inference is that approaching my legislators for interest in their help next year, and approaching groups like the Legion or Colorado National Guard wasn't helpful or welcome, thus the guidance instead of encouragement or advice to do ... anything.

Darn. I'd hoped, expected even, some hand-holding. Some guidance and encouragement. Referring back to their email of sixteen months ago was interesting, and the point was that I should have remembered it and been compliant with it. I guess I was influenced most by our leadership's 16 Nov 2016 instruction:

 "it is crucial that each of you reach out to your own State Senator and  Representative, and at least let him/her know that you are part of the UVC, and talk about how important it is that we support our veterans,

Oh, well.  Lesson learned about playing nice with others.

"...in keeping with our legislative agenda" - United Veterans Coalition Champions Veterans' Issues for Colorado. When the time is right, Gold Star Wives' concerns WILL be heard!

Four hundred and sixty thousand loud, strong voices.  

At the right time,, I'm hopeful these thousands of veterans will be convincing our General Assembly that Gold Star Wives should be eligible for the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption.

But this just isn't the right moment for GSW property tax issues. The benefit will be sought in the near future, just not right now. And it wasn't right back in 2016 when our state legislative agenda included Gold Star survivors but no traction was found, not even a draft bill.

UVC is "the tip of the spear" for our state's veterans. Speaking as one voice, coordinating dozens of organizations state-wide. VFW, DAV, American Legion, PVA, MOAA, NCOA, ROA, AFSA, VVA, and so many others of which I'm not a member – Submarine Veterans, Gold Star Wives - if an association serves vets and their families, if an organization promotes the national defense, they're a welcome part part of UVC and their concerns are heard. The various needs and propositions are discussed by the membership, and those agreed by UVC are delivered to the decision makers, both state and federal, in the form of the annual focused UVC legislative objectives.  

Legislators in Denver and Washington listen carefully, hearing those thousands of UVC voices when the United Veterans Coalition speaks. Whether addressing an individual legislator, senate or house committee, or public forum like a town hall meeting or city council, the United Veterans Coalition commands attention, and rightfully so.

I know this. On a few occasions, I was a witness before the National Academies of Science or one of the house or senate committees, and authorized to speak on behalf of the UVC. UVC was firmly behind me as I sought Agent Orange benefits for C-123 veterans. We got all of Colorado's senators and congressional representatives together to pressure the VA, even to block presidential nominations from consideration until VA acted. Finally, we won on the merit of the issue and UVC strength. 

We won the four year battle and gained VA Agent Orange benefits for 2500 Air Force C-123 aircrew, maintainers and survivors. Until Congress acted on the Blue Water Navy group, this was the only time VA added a new Agent Orange exposure group, and the only expansion of Agent Orange benefits since 1991. With HB16-1444 we won property tax exemptions for Colorado 450 military retirees and their survivors who'd been medically separated from their service as 100% disabled, and in doing so we brought the legislation into agreement with our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5. 

Not only does the UVC present veterans' concerns to our legislator, UVC also prioritizes the multitude of issues and forms an annual legislative agenda for both state and federal issues.

The UVC legislative agenda is already firmly set for 2021, but has yet to be finalized for 2022. Whether or not Gold Star Wives' property tax exemption is identified as an objective is up to the primary members and lobbyists of UVC. The coalition sorts out our needs, identifies the possible, and prioritizes them. Presto, the annual legislative agenda.

At the right time, Gold Star Wives' property tax issue is likely to be addressed by the coalition. Admirably, the GSW members are patient and understanding, with full confidence in the coalition.

The timing for GSW isn't right for 2021. Complexities of state budget, coalition priorities. Strategy and resources – all must align, and then UVC will deliver for the members of Colorado's Gold Star Wives. Let's get together for Gold Star Wives' proper place on the UVC 2022 legislative agenda!

SAMPLE MESSGE TO COLORADO STATE LEGISLATORS FOR GOLD STAR WIVES' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION

Colorado residents, there's a sample letter or email below that you should send your state senator or representative (around the end of June is the best time) as we fight to get the same property tax relief for Gold Star Wives as Colorado gives survivors of disabled veterans. 

Here are the names of Colorado's 35 senators and state's 65 representatives.

"In the spirit of the Assembly of the State of Colorado Senate Joint Resolution 21-010s, issued April 5, 2021 in honor of Gold Star Families, I strongly urge in 2022 much more substantive respect be shown Gold Star Wives with your support of 150 survivors whose spouses died on active military service.

As the needs of Colorado and its citizens form the 2022 legislative agenda, please support their inclusion in the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption. The only reason they are denied the benefit is that their spouses died on active military service.  Only the line-of-duty death of their military spouse disqualifies Gold Star Wives from the same modest state benefit extended to survivors of our totally disabled veterans.

Language in Article X Section 3.5 (1)(b) of the Colorado Constitution provides for survivors of totally disabled veterans and of the Senior Homestead Exemption. Illogically, the phrasing completely disqualifies survivors whose active-duty military spouses lost on active duty. Article X Section 3.5 (1)(b) reads, in part: 

 (b) The owner-occupier is the spouse or surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection

 

In 2014, HB 14-1373 dealt more directly with homesteaders' survivors, providing for "the surviving spouse who takes possession of the qualifying residence of a deceased."  Again, active duty troops' survivors were disqualified unless the family owned a Colorado home when the military spouse died – most military families, especially the young and junior ranks, do not own homes. Personal income and the frequent necessity of their transfers often makes home ownership illogical except as they near retirement. 

The language of HB 14-1373 also worked against the hopes of survivors stationed out of Colorado but hope to return or establish residence here. 

Colorado denies the exemption to survivors of active-duty military because their spouses died. Those servicemembers will never come home as disabled veterans, alive to be "previously qualified" for the exemption for which they never had the chance to apply. 

They died instead of being injured. Benefit denied the surviving spouse.  This is a too-gruesome "Catch-22".

It is also an illogical distinction between active duty troops' survivors and veterans' survivors. Perhaps our legislators did not intend to disqualify military survivors, but did they overlook the fact that not every soldier, sailor, airman or Marine will be coming home alive? Did they overlook the fact that America has been at war for the last two decades?

LSC estimates a total only 150 widows and widowers, survivors of active duty servicemembers. The state's homestead exemption benefits over a quarter million Colorado homeowners and their survivors. 

Gold Star Wives are just 0.0006% of that population. LCS says coverage for them would under $100,000 with negligible administrative overhead. Hardly an insurmountable hurdle for Colorado!

Perhaps today's wiser Legislature needs to include the death of an active-duty servicemember in its definition of "disabled veteran."

Leave a buddy behind? Never! Leave his widow behind? GOD FORGIVE US, because we've done so in Colorado!

I WILL NEVER LEAVE A

FALLEN COMRADE TO FALL INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. 

That's a standard first set by Rogers' Rangers in 1756 and a formal part of today's Ranger Creed. It is perfectly understood by every American soldier, sailor, airman and Marine:

 "I’m not going to leave my buddy on the battlefield if he’s wounded, I’m going to try not to leave him on the battlefield if he’s dead.”

I know that if I fall in battle, all of America's military might is there to get me out. And just as understood, never do we leave our buddy’s spouse behind. For my buddy's family will always come before my own.

I know that my deceased crew mates Larry, Ed, Mattie, the Gif, Gabby, Bob, Arch, Turcotte, Paul, Fred, Bill, Aaron, Ski, Gail, Maylene – they knew we got flight pay and hostile fire pay because of the risks we signed on for. Also, they all knew we would never abandon their loved ones. I know all two million now in uniform plus every veteran, was there to protect my wife and kids if I hadn’t made it back to base. At least, that's the case everywhere in the US, except that in Colorado it has been a hard sell. 

Here in the great mile-high Centennial State, we've dropped the ball when it comes to Gold Star Spouses, survivors of troops who die on active duty. We protect our disabled veterans' survivors as is right and proper, but we've excluded every one of the 150 surviving spouses of an active-duty death from eligibility under Colorado's Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption.

As an old soldier I find this abhorrent and a dishonorable state action in the extreme. We've left our buddy's spouse behind and there's just no excuse. Certainly, none that a fallen troop, a soldier husband or soldier wife, would accept!

We let this happen through oversight about legislation that created the disabled veterans' spouses' exemption in 2006 and 2014. In doing so legislators specifically used language to disquality around 150 Gold Star Spouses:

."..the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1)"

See our problem? A widow qualifies only as the survivor of a veteran who was already getting the exemption, language making it impossible for the widow of an active military line-of-duty death to be included. In an old movie and an older, very insightful book this was called "Catch-22." 

I've never seen a worse or more gruesome Catch-22! Let's get the United Veterans Coalition and every state legislator behind the correction.UVC, let’s correct this by 2022!

"New" 2019 Data on Gold Star Wives: from Colorado's Legislative Council Staff

 Just uncovered in our effort to protect survivors of active-duty line-of-duty deaths: Acting on the request from a Colorado state representative, the Legislative Council Staff (LCS) researched the addition of Gold Star Wives to our Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption and it is nowhere near the big numbers first anticipated.

LCS calculated around 150 potential widows/widowers might be made eligible, for a cost to the state budget of just $95,000. This is much more doable than the earlier estimate of nearly 1000 exemptions with the cost of just under $1 million. I think the number is higher, perhaps a couple hundred.

This is much more doable than the earlier estimate of nearly a thousand exemptions with the cost of just under $1 million. Still, it is a cost that must be matched by a reduction somewhere.

Other stats from the Colorado Fiscal Institute and other sources have been identified that help clarify things:

-addition of Gold Star Wives is just a 0.0006 fraction of the overall homestead exemption, or 150 compared to 450,000, and a similarly small portion of the vets/survivors' population of 5500 souls.

-veterans and survivors exemptions are only 2% of the overall homestead exemption
-disabled veterans; survivors include the only under 65 years of age population eligible for exemption

-52% of active duty troops are married and thus, potentially 52% of active duty deaths leave Gold Star Spouses. Overwhelmingly, and sadly, deaths are heaviest among younger troops, averaging age 30. This is always the case in war

-Nationally, around 27% of homeowners are age 35 or younger with an even lower percentage for active-duty military.

These numbers should help calm the "sticker shock" otherwise expected from legislators and state budget officials, and they also help move this project along as we firm up specifics. Thank you, LCS and the state representative who raised the issue with them in 2019. This really helps!

Some more statistics:

-Active-duty servicemembers have lower homeownership rates (mean 43%) at younger ages than veterans (78%) and the population as a whole (68%,) but they have the highest homeownership rates (71%) in the 55-up age group

-Home ownership by veterans is greatly benefited by VA loans, and by the steady disability or retirement income many have.

-Home ownership by active duty servicemembers is also benefited by VA loans, and steady, easily verified income. Ownership is made much more difficult due to frequent transfers, and there is a significant initial home ownership surge at retirement age

-As homeownership is an important wealth-building tool (Goodman and Mayer 2018), smaller
homeownership gaps by race or ethnicity also means smaller wealth gaps. According to the Panel Study
of Income Dynamics, the black-white housing wealth gap in 2017 was $48,500 for households with veterans and active-duty servicemembers ages 35 and 54, but the gap was $71,500 for nonmilitary households. Too many younger totally disabled veterans never have the opportunity to acquire wealth or home ownership due to income limitations, even with the VA loans.

-Veteran households (non-disabled) and active-duty military households have higher median household incomes than nonmilitary households, $70,000/yr vs. $60,000, with communities of color having lower race disparities than the general population.Household income also varies by military status, age and length of service. 

-The average income is $90,800 (with benefits' value included) for active-duty military households, $87,600 fo non-disabled veteran households, and $85,000 for nonmilitary households. Spousal income is lower for active-duty military than for veterans and the general population.

-

Can a deceased active duty soldier be defined as a "totally disabled veteran" for his/her Colorado survivors' benefits?

Wouldn't that be wonderful! And – maybe – easy also?

Because our state restricts survivor benefits to those whose veterans were already in receipt of the exemption at the time of death, we lock out from all such benefits survivors of troops who die on active duty. Perhaps we can use the existing language of the law. 

Perhaps, only changing the interpretation or definition of the words "totally disabled veteran already in receipt of the exemption" to something like "or active duty death considered to be 'totally disabled and already in receipt of the exemption."

 

Met With American Legion Post, Fort Collins

I had an invitation this evening to request a resolution by the American Legion Post in Fort Collins. The subject:
Gold Star Wives. The resolution has to be voted on locally in order to proceed to the district, and then the Department of Colorado. I enjoyed a free beer and help with my wheelchair!

Here's the resolution:

WHEREAS, Since the Revolutionary War, more than one million American soldiers have died in battle and military conflicts; their families, who have endured these losses and the accompanying grief, are known as Gold Star Families and their spouses as Gold Star Wives; and Gold Star Families are a living legacy of each fallen soldier to help us all remember and honor these heroes by name and deed, and

WHEREAS, on April 5 2021 the Seventy-third General Assembly of the State of Colorado issued Senate Joint Resolution 21-010, resolving on behalf of the citizens “That we, the members of the Colorado General Assembly, honor the pride and the pain of the parents and partners and children and siblings of our fallen heroes who lost his or her life serving our country and protecting our freedom; and recognize the families of these proud patriots with an expression of profound gratitude and respect” and

WHEREAS, in 2006 the citizens of Colorado overwhelmingly approved by amendment to the State Constitution Article X Section 3.5 the Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption for totally disabled service-connected military veterans; and in 2014 the Colorado Legislature established the Disabled Veteran Surviving Spouse Property Tax Exemption for surviving spouses of totally disabled veterans already in receipt of the exemption by HB14-1373, and

WHEREAS, the sacrifices of Gold Star Families are to be honored with respect as well as material support and

WHEREAS, surviving spouses of servicemembers who die on active duty are only by the technicality of their servicememember’s death not being in receipt of the exemption thereby denied the exemption, and

WHEREAS, this distinction between survivors of totally disabled veterans already in receipt of theDisabled Property Tax Exemption and survivors of active duty servicemembers (“Gold Star Wives”) denied the exemption solely due to the death of their spouse while in service is an offense to the honor of the State, contrary to the Seventy-third General Assembly of the State of Colorado Senate Joint Resolution 21-010, and contrary to the intentions of Colorado citizens’ approval of Article X Section 3.5 as presented in the 2006 Referendum E, and

WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of the American Legion and the Gold Star Wives are both member organizations of the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado, and

WHEREAS, either a legislative or constitutional amendment process being necessary, it may suffice that a redefinition of “disabled veteran” to include a death on active duty, or other such procedure as theGeneral Assembly shall direct; and that surviving spouses of Colorado Air and Army National Guardmembers who die while activated by the Governor for State service should also receive such respect and benefits, it is therefore

RESOLVED, by the George Beach Post 4 of the Department of Colorado that inclusion of unremarried Gold Star Wives and unremarried surviving spouses of State National Guard members who die while activated by the Governor for State service, be included in the Disabled Veteran Survivor Property Tax Exemption because it is both necessary and proper, that the United Veterans Coalition be informed for this to be part of its state legislative objectives until acted upon; and the Colorado Board of Veterans Affairs and all relevant committees of the Colorado General Assembly be informed of this Department’s wish that efforts by them be undertaken for inclusion of Gold Star Wives in the Disabled VeteranSurvivor Property Tax Exemption with a goal of implementation before 2023.

A possible solution: redefine "disabled veteran" to include deceased active duty servicemenbers?

 Perhaps this approach can work. I've found House Bill 14-1737 which added surviving spouses to the exemption for totally disabled veterans. Apparently this was done under the umbrella of the state constitution's Article X Section 3.5 which made no mention of survivors – the legislature just did it.

Can the legislature do it again? Can't the legislature define an active duty servicemember who dies in the line of duty as a disabled veteran? That might work to pack into Article X Section 3.5 our few Gold Star Wives. The new text is in red

Colorado Owes Our Gold Star Widows the Property Tax Exemption Given Disabled Veterans' Widows

 

Scan codes to download our Gold Star Wives Property Tax Exemption briefer and our Powerpoint talk

These will be go to our Google Drive files for the most current version of the one page brief, the longer full background report, and the PowerPoint presentation that's been used so far. The Colorado National Guard is mentioned throughout but will be only more generally referenced in a later version.

1.The two page shortest possible handout is linked here.

2. Full 12-page brief:
Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N0HT08Ykq4gHjoQnB-8zU4dudaWLtdLn/view?usp=sharing

3. PowerPoint briefing (18mb): Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SpTlf_i0ttwSEjTuuC4TWbNR6S5CSU5O/view?usp=sharing

4. Background Files Collection (120 pages)
Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15k0Ee2ddxtgJtzP4_pH_S7qUnL36VEHZ/view?usp=sharing

SITREP 24 Apr 2021: Stalled??

Stalled? Well, certainly not much interest, although everyone'a so polite. After all, how can anyone not be compassionate towards Gold Star Wives?  What about the argument "Equal taxes for Gold Star Wives?" Does it just fall flat?

Well, too often there's only mild concern about this problem with Colorado's Gold Star Wives' property tax issue. In six years I've had conversations with United Veterans Collation, chiefs of staff in Denver, legislative assistants and others. I've sent out over 500 emails with but two or three responses, including a very nice one recently from Senator Joann Ginal's staff here in Fort Collins. 

Perhaps this will be something our local senator will get behind, for which I'm grateful even for her briefest consideration of the issue. From her colleagues, from other directions, other places. Nothing.

Nothing.

"Not my problem, but perhaps you could talk to your legislator." 

"We can't do anything on survivors' benefits. That's (fill in the blank) responsibility." "Maybe next year."

"We need all possible questions answered before we can possibly discuss this." (BTW, I'm 75 years old, quite ill, sucking oxygen, worried about whether my cancer is gone, homebound and I've only got a few thousand dollars budgeted to throw at the issue. It isn't like I'm able to do this myself: Rather, I pretty much expected responsible public servants and veterans advocates to see a problem when laid out before them and discuss how it can be resolved. Yeah, right. 

Since 2016 when I first brought this to the attention of UVC, there's been ZIP, zero, nada, nothing. I thought the issue of Colorado making Gold Star Wives pay more property taxes than survivors of Colorado's 100% disabled veterans would strike many Coloradans as wrong to the core. Nope.

League of Women Voters, University Women clubs, veterans organizations, DMVA, DOLA, other state agencies – almost universally no response at all. The folks I was to speak with are disappointed to learn that Gold Star Wives whose spouses died on active duty are denied the same partial property tax exemption. granted survivors of totally disabled veterans. They're somewhat taken aback. Saddened, a little. Disbelieving that the state would do that to military widows. Disappointed.

Disappointed, but not pained enough by this gruesome distinction between the two types of military widows that anyone seems to be willing to do anything. Other issues crowd Colorado's United Veterans Coalition state legislative agenda for 2021, just as they have in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. The other issues are important, of course, but so is unjust taxation of active duty widows. 

I'm puzzled: How could UVC have a (very worthy!) goal of property tax relief VA Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) disabled veterans (wonderful – a goal I've also advocated directly and thru the UVC since 2015!) but not Gold Star Wives? Logically, conscious state leaders would balk at tens of thousands of TDIU claimants, but not at under a thousand Gold Star Wives. Logically, both issues are so tied to the same Article X Section 3.5 that they both should have been legislative objectives, either jointly or as separate issues.

I need to remind myself of Ecclesiastes 9:10: “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it." Sounds reasonable...just keep doing it as best we can.

with thy might.”I'm amazed, because this is an issue guaranteed to get a virtually unanimous vote if it could ever reach our legislators. After all, imagine the news photo of the very few politicians who would raise their hands in opposition to legislation permitting Gold Star widows the same property tax exemption granted survivors of totally disabled veterans.

There are so few Gold Star Wives. Especially few are the Gold Star Wives whose spouses died on active duty. The best guess is Colorado has fewer than one thousand men and women survivors of troops lost on active duty. The number pales against the numbers receiving the Homestead Exemption – the total disabled veterans and survivors are only 2% of the general homestead exemption category, and active duty widows/widowers a terribly smaller percentage of that.

Here's the sum of a couple thousand dollars spent trying to get some action and six years of writing, calling, visiting, emailing and glad-handing:
1. A single state senator's staff called me once and emailed me twice, and is still looking at this
2. A Zoom meeting on April 19 2021 to explain what I had on my mind, but "where is the money to come from" and "what legislators are behind this" and "we can't say anything until we see some legislation." So much for my hope of leadership from the Governor or Lieutenant Governor. It isn't that they are supposed to help, but it would help, Help a lot. I expected a genuine "that's terrible, and must be fixed because by God we don't treat war widows that way."
It never came. Instead, "thanks for your input, good bye." If there was help to be offered, or even mild encouragement, not that day. Nor any other day.
3. Two emails came back from folks directing the UVC state legislative effort. They explained GSW was represented in the coalition. It was good learn that CSW could submit the issue for next year's legislative objectives and that is was seemed "reasonable." Indeed. I thought UVC was the best place to turn for action. That's what I thought last month. That's what I thought six years ago.
4. I received an email from a wonderful state Gold Star Wife explaining that their organization is sensitive to Colorado's budget issues during 2020 and 2021, and they don't want to add to the tax burden of their fellow citizens. They are also grateful to the Colorado National Guard and feel survivors of Guard members killed on active state or federal service should be included in any property tax exemption.
They feel next year or 2023 might be a more appropriate time to seek action. I have to admire their patience and self-sacrifice, not only as Gold Star Wives but in the great caution they take to avoid a state budget impact. Willing to let my family have the small property tax exemption that rightfully should have gone to them as the first priority of the government and citizens of Colorado.

Visiting with the Colorado National Guard Conference

Great opportunity to discuss efforts to get property tax exemptions for Gold Star Spouses, not this year but working toward 2022 or 2023 at the latest.

Great opportunity to discuss efforts to get property tax exemptions for Gold Star Spouses, working toward 2022 or 2023 at the latest.

 

Equal Treatment for Colorado Gold Star Wives!

 

Update on Timing, United Veterans Coalition and More:

TIMING IS EVERYTHING

Today I've had some very welcome input from "those in the know" about a Gold Star Wives property tax
exemption efforts, and want to post it here.

First, neither United Veterans Coalition of Colorado nor Gold Star Wives is seeking action on such issues for 2021, and that's ideal because some groundwork is needed this year. There is no possibility of resolution until 2022 and more likely, not until 2023. There are many veterans issues on this year's schedule and it is vital to set priorities.

I'll continue efforts to contact UVC committee chairs about how they'd suggest moving forward. This kind of property tax relief is not on the list of UVC legislative objectives. UVC does have, however, the objective of legislation adding veterans with permanent and total individual "unemployability" (my thoughts) to the benefit. I like legislation rather than constitutional amendment, but certainly feel the priority should rest with action helping survivors as soon as politics and economics permit.

Here's UVC's state legislative objective. Note Item 7, which reads:

7. Support legislation to add ‘Individually Unemployable’ veterans (as defined by U.S.C.Title 38) to the Homestead Act property tax exemption

Mission Statement & Initial Plans for Gold Star Wives 2022 Property Tax Initiative

CLICK to download this 5-page outline of this goal for Gold Star Wives to get the same property tax relief as do survivors of disabled veterans.

Progress. Notes – April 16, 2021

 I have to admit, progress thus far is fairly disappointing. Mailings and phone calls for two weeks to politicians, associations, veterans, the media and everyone else I could think of have had a single response. Senator Ginia's staffer called to ask a couple questions to decide whether she'd brief her boss.

On Monday I have a Zoom call with the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor's chiefs of staff. I have questions aplenty, but don't know what their perspective is. Last year it was all about, "Nice, Wes. We'd like to offer widows the exemption but where's the money to come from?"

Here's an issue nobody in the Capitol would vote against, and we can't get traction. At age 75 and with various attention-grabbing health issues, I sure hope some champion will leap out in front of this project to take it on.

Scan our QR code for the Gold Star Wives briefing packet

Gold Star Wives Poster - Disabled Veteran Property Tax Exemption

Correct! It seems our state legislature simply didn't contemplate the possibility of Colorado soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines dying on active duty. That's why Colorado seem to have forgotten to offer our Gold Star Wives the same widows' benefits as we provide to survivors of totally disabled veterans.

That's unjust and plain WRONG! But not a single widow of an active duty service member is permitted the Colorado Disabled Veteran's Survivor Property Tax Exemption, a small exemption saving widows between $400-$600 a year.

Why? Our state constitution's Article X Section 3.5 permits the exemption only to widows of disabled veterans already in receipt of the benefit. Dying on Active Duty means not being able to complete the application process – because the service member died first!

This is Really an Amazing and Ridiculous Catch-22!

Why is the small property tax exemption of value to Gold Star Wives?

First, it shows the state's respect and appreciation for the loss borne by these widows and widowers. The partial tax exemption would only save about $400 to $600. It would seem a minor issue to most of us. 

But look at this from a Gold Star Widow's perspective. Circumstances vary, but if eligible widows can receive half of the service member's base pay. More than half of all military deaths are E-5 and below. An Army E-5 three-stripe sergeant would have a widow pension of under $2,000 per month.

The VA has "Dependents Indemnity Compensation," where if eligible a survivor might receive $1,300 per month. So, at best, our late sergeant's widow (or widower) hopes for a modest $39,000 per year.

How far does that go? In Colorado, the average home mortgage cost is $1,700 per month, and with typical associated costs like taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance, a monthly cost of over $2,400 or $28,000 annually. You can do the math – that leaves $916 per month for food, transportation, insurance, clothing. 

Summary: Colorado Life did a thorough report on the money necessary to live in Colorado one needs $4,317.68 per month to live in Colorado if there is a mortgage involved. Oops – that leaves our widow short by over $12,000 per year. That's why the paltry $400-$600 partial property tax exemption is important. 

The burden of property tax is a huge reason so many citizens can never afford a home, and that's even more true for military folks. That's why so few junior military own homes at the time of death and why so few widows are affected by this proposed tax exemption.

For me, I wish it was a total tax exemption as many states provide! The survivor of a service member who dies on active duty obviously have to make many, many compromises to live on $12,000 less per year than what "average" citizens need.

I think I'll do a poster based on the graphic above, but try to get the word count reduced.

Mission Statement: Really, it is very simple.

When Colorado voters extended a partial property tax relief to totally disabled veterans and their survivors back in 2006, somehow no provision was made for survivors of troops who die on active duty.

To do so requires amending Article X Section 3.5 of the state constitution. We need to begin "baby steps" in 2021 for a decision by the voters in either 2022 or 2023.

 

IS EXCLUSION OF UNEMPLOYABLE, PERMANENTLY AND TOTALLY DISABLED VETERANS WHAT WE VOTED FOR? What about "VA Unemployability" disability ratings?*

(From the 2006 Blue Cook - what we were asked to approve. See my 2017 here, and my 2021 analysis below*)

Legislative Council of the Colorado General Assembly

REFERENDUM E:
 Summary and Analysis  (Research Pub. No. 554)

How does the program work?

Homeowners pay property taxes based on the value of their home and the tax rate set by the local governments where they live. Referendum E reduces the taxable value of a qualified veteran's home by one-half of the first $200,000 of the home's value, thereby lowering property taxes owed on the home. The state legislature can adjust the $200,000 amount to either increase or decrease the benefit from Referendum E in future years. 

Currently, the state offers the same property tax reduction to homeowners age 65 and over who have lived in their homes for at least ten years. A qualifying veteran who is also eligible for a reduction in property taxes as a senior cannot claim both reductions. The dollar amount of the tax reduction will vary among homeowners depending upon the local property tax rate, the home's value, and the amount of the exemption. 

Who qualifies for the tax reduction? Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability qualify for the tax reduction in Referendum E. Colorado National Guard members injured while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces also qualify. Veterans are rated 100-percent permanently disabled when a mental or physical injury makes it impossible for the average person to hold a job and the disability is lifelong. (1)

Nationally, less than one percent of veterans have a 100-percent permanent disability rating. About 2,200 veterans are expected to qualify for the property tax reduction in Colorado. 

What are the fiscal implications? Referendum E affects property taxes paid beginning in 2008. The average property tax savings for those who qualify will be about $466. The total reduction in property taxes is estimated to be about $1 million in the first year.(2)

 The state is required to reimburse local governments for the reduction in property tax revenue resulting from Referendum E. 

Arguments For:

1) Colorado needs to do more to help veterans who have sacrificed their health for our nation and state.(3) Many states offer a property tax reduction for disabled veteran homeowners, and six states do not require these veterans to pay any property taxes. (4)

 Referendum E provides one way, at a modest cost, for Colorado to thank 100-percent permanently disabled veterans for their service. 

2) The money that Referendum E saves qualifying veterans can improve their quality of life. Despite existing government benefits, veterans still have unmet financial needs that are tied to their disability. 

Unlike most other citizens, 100-percent permanently disabled veterans have very limited opportunities to improve their quality of life through employment and other means. (5)

Referendum E is an opportunity for the state to at least partially offset this economic disadvantage. 

Arguments Against: 

1) Referendum E is a special interest tax break that benefits less than one-twentieth of one percent of all Colorado residents. When one group benefits financially from a tax reduction, other taxpayers must pay. If the state can afford to reduce taxes for certain taxpayer groups, it should reduce taxes for all taxpayers. Referendum E further singles out a portion of the taxpayers it proposes to help by reducing taxes for 100-percent disabled veterans who are financially able to own homes. Disabled veterans who do not own a home do not benefit from this proposal. (6)

2) Because veterans were in the service of the federal government, the responsibility to meet the financial needs of veterans rests with the federal government. By creating a new state program for a small group of veterans, Referendum E interferes with the balance of benefits set by the federal government. In addition, the recent focus on international conflicts may lead voters to believe the state is providing a benefit to only those veterans who were injured in a combat zone when in fact the injury may have resulted while on call or during a time when the United States was not at war. 

Estimate of Fiscal Impact:
Referendum E increases state expenditures because it requires the state to reimburse local governments for reduced property tax collections. The state estimates that roughly 2,200 disabled veterans will qualify for the exemption and the average property tax reduction per veteran will be $466. Thus, the impact to the state will be slightly more than $1 million, beginning with the 2008 budget year.(7)

------------here's my assessment after 3 years study-----------

1.  Notice no mention of unemployability, the disqualifier added by Colorado's legislators, DOLA or CDMVA,  isn't in the Blue Book, but "disabled veteran" is clearly described. Voters are told the benefit we approve is for "Homeowners who have served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and are rated 100-percent permanently disabled by the federal government due to a service-connected disability" and "100-percent permanently disabled veterans have very limited opportunities to improve their quality of life through employment and other means. The more exact term for this is "total disability for individual unemployability." or TDIU. It is total, and it is permanent. TDIU and 100% schedular disability ratings are about 8% of VA Disabled veterans (TDIU and 100% schedular) are about 8% of VA disability ratings. Nationwide, there are about 800,000 such ratings.

Unemployability, as defined by VA, from their web site:

"VA Individual Unemployability if you can't work

If you can’t work because of a disability related to your service in the military (a service-connected disability), you may qualify for what’s called “Individual Unemployability.” This means you may be able to get disability compensation or benefits at the same level as a Veteran who has a 100% disability rating.

Am I eligible for disability benefits from VA? You may be eligible for disability benefits if you meet both of the requirements listed below.

Both of these must be true:

You have at least 1 service-connected disability rated at 60% or more disabling, or 2 or more service-connected disabilities—with at least 1 rated at 40% or more disabling and a combined rating of 70% or more—and

You can’t hold down a steady job that supports you financially (known as substantially gainful employment) because of your service-connected disability. Odd jobs (marginal employment) don’t count."

TDIU is total, and it is permanent. TDIU veterans are actually not able or even permitted to work because VA has examined them and determined that their combination of service-connected disabilities make it impossible to do so. VA even monitors IRS and Social Security records to double-check veterans awarded this disability rating, although vets are permitted odd jobs. Vets with the "regular" VA rating of 100% disability are permitted to work and encouraged to try doing so if possible for good mental and physical health and for economic security.

2.  The total veterans and qualified survivors is currently 5858, compared to 245,000 receiving the senior exemption, with an annual budget impact of $3,524,000 vs. $136,000,000 for seniors.

3. Colorado ranks just a modest 25th among the states in veterans' benefits. Many studies have proved the fact that the more veteran-friendly a state is, the more likely to benefit from veterans living there. The money and the needs of Colorado's military retirees, and disabled vets plus survivors created over 26,000 good Colorado jobs in 2020. As for the disabled veteran survivor property tax exemption, nobody expects a veteran's survivor to relocate here to save $645. Those who do from whatever state, are to be honored and eligible for the exemption we seek. Disabled veterans bring into Colorado VA checks for almost $2,000,000,000 to spend on food, clothing, shelter, medical care entertainment, travel – the cost to Colorado in its meager state benefits is a pittance against this. Totally disabled veterans' dependence on state public assistance is insignificant.

4.  Currently nineteen states (up from six in 2006) waive all property taxes for disabled veterans and survivors. Most more states offering an exemption larger exemption offer more than Colorado. Only a few offer no exemption.

5. A TDIU veteran receives at most $37,570 per year, still a low range where many agencies assist families. This will be the vet's income throughout his/her life with no pay raises, no promotions, nothing beyond the VA monthly check. When most non-disabled veterans and civilians are approaching retirement age, having acquired wealth, home, car, etc., the average income is over $57,000 per year, leaving disabled veterans far, far behind. The younger the veteran when disabled, the further behind with age. Bankruptcies are common. 

6. Home ownership is usually out of reach. However, any savings helps them afford to qualify for and continue to afford their own homes.

7. A TDIU veteran receives at most $37,570 per year, still a low range where many agencies assist families. This will be the vet's income throughout his/her life with no pay raises, no promotions, nothing beyond the VA monthly check. When most non-disabled veterans and civilians are approaching retirement age, having acquired wealth, home, car, etc., the average income is over $57,000 per year, leaving disabled veterans far, far behind. The younger the veteran when disabled, the further behind with age. Bankruptcies are common.